| College Football The place to talk about college football teams other than Ohio State |
|
View Poll Results: College Playoff - Yes or No?
|
|
Yes, small playoff format 4-12 teams and keep the rest of the bowls.
|
   
|
54 |
49.54% |
|
Yes, large playoff format 16+ teams with no bowls.
|
  
|
5 |
4.59% |
|
No, but tweak current BCS.
|
  
|
33 |
30.28% |
|
No, keep the current BCS system.
|
  
|
12 |
11.01% |
|
No, go back to the traditional Bowl tie-ins only
|
  
|
5 |
4.59% |
11-30-2006, 12:35 PM
|
 |
SCREW BLUE!
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,810
Points: 99,818.87
Bank: 562.31
Total Points: 100,381.18
|
|
|
Poll: College Playoff Yes or No?
It was pointed out that there is not currently a poll on this site for this topic.
College Playoff Discussion Thread: College Playoff
__________________
Last edited by MuckFich06; 11-30-2006 at 12:40 PM.
Reason: Edit broken link
|
11-30-2006, 12:40 PM
|
 |
Watson, Crick & A Twist
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,407
Points: 1,457,721.83
Bank: 0.28
Total Points: 1,457,722.11
|
|
|
Link has an error in it MuckFich06.
__________________
"They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it is not half so bad as a lot of ignorance." - Terry Pratchett
|
11-30-2006, 12:42 PM
|
|
SCREW BLUE!
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,810
Points: 99,818.87
Bank: 562.31
Total Points: 100,381.18
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandgk
Link has an error in it MuckFich06.
|
Thanks, fixed it.
__________________
|
11-30-2006, 12:50 PM
|
 |
Would Walk a Mile
Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,029
Points: 1,199,187.68
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,199,187.68
|
|
|
Not voting in this poll, because what I want is not an option.
I say go back before the BCS, before even the Bowl Coalition, and reset things to the way they used to be.
People obsess way too much about this crap. There was nothing inherently wrong with the old system that occassionally resulted in split NCs, and at least back then you still had the history of the great bowl tie-ins, such as the Big-10/Pac-10 in the Rose, people giving a [censored] about who was in the Cotton Bowl, etc ...
A playoff system won't "fix" anything. It won't give access to the national title game to mid-majors, because mid-majors will get waxed in a war of attrition with the depth of the majors. Could BYU win a national title in the current BCS? No. Could BYU win a national title in a playoff? No. In the old system, a team like BYU could, and did, have a shot at a national championship.
Look at the teams that have realistically competed in the BCS era; the ones that have gone to BCS games versus those that have been left out. A playoff would expose the talent gap, the disparity in depth, and make things even worse, not better.
Parity my ass.
__________________
|
11-30-2006, 01:03 PM
|
 |
What one man can do, another can do
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,505
Points: 22,803.34
Bank: 0.28
Total Points: 22,803.62
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dryden
Not voting in this poll, because what I want is not an option.
I say go back before the BCS, before even the Bowl Coalition, and reset things to the way they used to be.
People obsess way too much about this crap. There was nothing inherently wrong with the old system that occassionally resulted in split NCs, and at least back then you still had the history of the great bowl tie-ins, such as the Big-10/Pac-10 in the Rose, people giving a [censored] about who was in the Cotton Bowl, etc ...
|
I totally agree, and would point out that thanks to the damn AP we're pretty much back where we were pre-BCS, but with stupid BCS rules mucking up the bowl matchups. The BCS came about, in part, to settle the matter of split NCs between coaches' and media polls, and then just a handful of years later the self-righteous AP leaves because they don't want to "create" the news, just report it. So now we've got... separate coaches' and media polls, again, plus a half-dozen computers and the Harris nonsense. USC still claims a half-title in the BCS era, and the AP continues to make news...
The BCS sucks, and a playoff simply isn't D-IA CFB: I wanna go back...
|
11-30-2006, 01:06 PM
|
|
SCREW BLUE!
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,810
Points: 99,818.87
Bank: 562.31
Total Points: 100,381.18
|
|
|
Sorry there Dryden and Bay Buck, should have given you that option. I left it off because it is the one option I didn't see as a possibility moving forward.
__________________
|
11-30-2006, 01:11 PM
|
 |
Cognoscente of Omphaloskepsis
Senior Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,006
Points: 1,061,554.79
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,061,554.79
|
|
Quote:
|
People obsess way too much about this crap. There was nothing inherently wrong with the old system that occassionally resulted in split NCs,
|
Agree. Talking about which team should have been NC makes more sense than having a Wild Card win the SuperBowl. In CFB you can argue for hours. In most other sports you can only shake your head.
I do think this position fits under "no playoff, tweak the BCS" which is how I voted.
In any case, glad to finally have a thread to talk about this important topic.
Oh - and get rid of the Designated Hitter rule.
Last edited by Oh8ch; 11-30-2006 at 01:16 PM.
|
11-30-2006, 01:14 PM
|
|
What one man can do, another can do
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,505
Points: 22,803.34
Bank: 0.28
| | |
