TSUN News/Recruiting

[LightningRod]

Barwis is so great that Dan Mozes, the 2006 Rimington Award winner, was not drafted.

[HailToMichigan]

Originally Posted by NFBuck

Yikes. What does our UM contingent think of this?

Not too hard to guess. Of course, it's bad news. Always is when a potential starter leaves.

It is, however, not exactly cataclysmic. The offensive line is different than every other unit on the team. One really good player (say, one really good wide receiver or linebacker) can do a lot to cover up the deficiencies of the others by making plays. One really good offensive lineman does not help, because the rest of them are still going to get trampled and you can't run your offense.

So, actually very little has changed. Before Boren left it was on Schilling, Ortmann, etc. to step up and perform like starters, otherwise the offense was going to go nowhere. Now, it's still on those guys to perform, same as it was before. If they step up and play well, then it will be on Boren's replacement to do the same, else be the weak link in an otherwise strong line. If they don't? Then Justin Boren would not have made a lick of difference.

Bottom line: The offensive line was the weak link and the huge question mark in this offense before and it's the weak link and huge question mark in the offense now. The loss of Boren, counterintuitively, really doesn't make it any more contingent on the rest of the line to play well, because they were already the make-or-break unit on this team.

[sandgk]

So, things are thinner now on the O-line than they were before - but that's OK, we were already thinning on top?

[TheIronColonel]

I see your logic, and it seems sound. What about the psychological effects, though? I can't imagine this is helping morale at all, with the two guys tabbed to lead the offense this year (Boren and Mallet) both leaving the program. It would also seem to bode an ill wind for the recruitment of Zach Boren, who was apparently leaning toward OSU over TSUN in the first place. This may have a wider effect than just the play of the offensive line.

[NFBuck]

Originally Posted by HailToMichigan

Not too hard to guess. Of course, it's bad news. Always is when a potential starter leaves.

It is, however, not exactly cataclysmic. The offensive line is different than every other unit on the team. One really good player (say, one really good wide receiver or linebacker) can do a lot to cover up the deficiencies of the others by making plays. One really good offensive lineman does not help, because the rest of them are still going to get trampled and you can't run your offense.

So, actually very little has changed. Before Boren left it was on Schilling, Ortmann, etc. to step up and perform like starters, otherwise the offense was going to go nowhere. Now, it's still on those guys to perform, same as it was before. If they step up and play well, then it will be on Boren's replacement to do the same, else be the weak link in an otherwise strong line. If they don't? Then Justin Boren would not have made a lick of difference.

Bottom line: The offensive line was the weak link and the huge question mark in this offense before and it's the weak link and huge question mark in the offense now. The loss of Boren, counterintuitively, really doesn't make it any more contingent on the rest of the line to play well, because they were already the make-or-break unit on this team.

Pretty much the main response I was expecting.

Originally Posted by sandgk

So, things are thinner now on the O-line than they were before - but that's OK, we were already thinning on top?

It would seem
I know if tOSU was trying to impliment a radically different offensive scheme, losing our best offensive lineman would have me pretty damn concerned.

[jwinslow]

HTM, I think you're oversimplifying things a bit. If you were simply accepting ineptitude up front, then you can argue that lousy and awful are hard to tell apart as a result of this departure.

But if there was hope for decent to good play, even just in spurts... this puts a gigantic roadblock in that path.

A brand new LT, when UM can't really field a true RT... and a redshirt freshman center... now get to play alongside another brand new starter, possibly a true freshman. That's a noticeable difference from lining up alongside a veteran and reported leader.

[Jaxbuck]

Originally Posted by HailToMichigan

Not too hard to guess. Of course, it's bad news. Always is when a potential starter leaves.

It is, however, not exactly cataclysmic. The offensive line is different than every other unit on the team. One really good player (say, one really good wide receiver or linebacker) can do a lot to cover up the deficiencies of the others by making plays. One really good offensive lineman does not help, because the rest of them are still going to get trampled and you can't run your offense.

So, actually very little has changed. Before Boren left it was on Schilling, Ortmann, etc. to step up and perform like starters, otherwise the offense was going to go nowhere. Now, it's still on those guys to perform, same as it was before. If they step up and play well, then it will be on Boren's replacement to do the same, else be the weak link in an otherwise strong line. If they don't? Then Justin Boren would not have made a lick of difference.

Bottom line: The offensive line was the weak link and the huge question mark in this offense before and it's the weak link and huge question mark in the offense now. The loss of Boren, counterintuitively, really doesn't make it any more contingent on the rest of the line to play well, because they were already the make-or-break unit on this team.