![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| College Football The place to talk about college football teams other than Ohio State |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
|
I know that, my point is I suspect the fact that it did happen to Auburn made it color your view of the post-season much more strongly than it would have had the exact same thing happened to, say, Nebraska.
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
They do when they're meaningful - like USC's losses to UCLA, Stanford, and Oregon State the last 3 years.
Those upsets would mean a helluva lot less if USC ended up in a playoff at the end of the year. Especially to fans outside the Pac 10. |
|
||||||||
|
Then why even have a BCS title game if it is so obvious who the clear #1 team is every year in college football? Just crown a champion after the regular season is over.
|
|
|||||||||
|
That'd be fine by me.
|
|
|||||||||
|
No, I'm against crowning a Villanova 1985 ish team "champion"
|
|
|||||||||
|
Wow - powerful argument for changing a system that isn't broken
BTW: Do you still believe that the pro-playoff crowd vastly outnumbers the anti-playoff crowd? If so, why are none (ok, maybe one) of your multitude coming to your defense? |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Unless, that is, TSUN was in the playoffs and they included lower division teams like Appalachian State? Last edited by BB73; 07-02-2009 at 12:15 PM. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by BB73; 07-02-2009 at 12:15 PM. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
How could you choose fairly between the top-3 last year? |
|
||||||||
|
Great. It would be just like the 60s and 70s where three or four organizations crowning the national champion.
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|