| College Football The place to talk about college football teams other than Ohio State |
11-30-2006, 02:17 PM
|
|
Cruncher of Numbers / Drinker of Beer
Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,108
Points: 1,405,050.93
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,405,050.93
|
|
Well, the poll thread on this topic has kicked off. It may eventually be merged with this thread.
It was borne of a stupid comment by Stewart Mandel HERE.
What gets me about SM @ SI blathering about everybody wanting a play-off is that he is just exhibiting human nature. But it is precisely that aspect of human nature that people in his profession should NOT allow themselves.
People tend to believe that more people agree with them than actually do. People tend to think other people know what they know and think as they think, and if those "others" don't agree with them, those "others" are stupid. Several times in my life I have seen Native New Yorkers make fun of people for not knowing specific aspects of New York City Geography. And all of those conversations occurred hundreds of miles from the Big Apple. This doesn't make New Yorkers different from everyone else. They think The City is the only place in the world, and they therefore think everyone else thinks so too.
Examples can also be drawn from elsewhere in College Football. Mike Golic famously sang our fight song after losing a bet to Spiels. He had to sing USC's recently after losing another bet. He noted that he had to refer to a lyric sheet for each of those humiliations, and then had the temerity to suggest that when he finally wins one of these bets that the loser won't have to look at a crib sheet because, "Everyone knows the lyrics to Notre Dame's fight song".
I don't know about you, but I have been a college football fan to a point that might wife calls a sick obsession for literally longer than I can remember. I have NO FLIPPING CLUE what the words to that over-rated assault on the ears might be.
But I do not fault Golic for believing what he believes. It's human nature, and he's just a jock.
And that brings us back at long last to Stewart Mandel. He's not just "the jock in the booth". He's supposedly a sports journalist. He should bloody well know how human nature affects him, and he should check the veracity of any assumptions he makes. If he misses it, his editor should call him aside and say, "Hey Stu, our polls don't support your claim here...".
I guess that's too much to ask.
__________________
Quote:
|
You don't get respect in debates. You get respect in actions. And 2008's on the way.
|
-Jim Tressel
|
11-30-2006, 02:27 PM
|
 |
The Senator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,265
Points: 250,218.78
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 250,218.78
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyBigBucks
Well, the poll thread on this topic has kicked off. It may eventually be merged with this thread.
|
Pretty sure if you merge threads it will kill the poll.
__________________
|
11-30-2006, 03:15 PM
|
 |
Danny Monaco
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,991
Points: 17,100,531.00
Bank: 2,909.89
Total Points: 17,103,440.89
|
|
|
This is always an interesting topic to me, and most of my thoughts have already been expressed in this thread.
The most common idea I have heard is an 8 team playoff, with the 6 champions of the major BCS conferences going in and 2 at large bids. In my opinion it's a nice idea, however, it still adds the human element into the conversation and brings us right back to this same discussion every year. How do we determine a true national champ in college football.
Personally, I hate the BCS, I think all it does is show bias towards a lot of teams that really don't deserve it, the Domers for example, go to a BCS bowl and get kicked around due to the fact that somehow the computers and the voters fail to see how horribly rated that program currently is. Also, no system really gives any consideration to any team from the MAC/WAC etc... Granted I realize they don't get the recruits that a major program does but it doesn't seem fair that they will never even have a chance at a national title.
Personally, I don't see an easy patch which is why I think we are where we are, but I do feel there needs to be some way to take the conference champs and do something better than this.
Perhaps the 8 team playoff solution is better, I realize that they discussions would be "well I deserve an at large bid" from everyone who doesn't win thier conference but at least for the major 6 conferences it provides an arguement. Why aren't the weasels in the tourney? simple, they didn't win thier conference.
The downside to this is that some conferences, the big 10 for example, have split champions all the time, but with the 12th game added in the regular schedule why isn't everyone playing everyone? Meaning that would be for each conference to address.
|
11-30-2006, 03:31 PM
|
 |
SCREW BLUE!
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,473
Points: 102,469.09
Bank: 558.39
Total Points: 103,027.48
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyBigBucks
What gets me about SM @ SI blathering about everybody wanting a play-off is that he is just exhibiting human nature. But it is precisely that aspect of human nature that people in his profession should NOT allow themselves.
People tend to believe that more people agree with them than actually do. People tend to think other people know what they know and think as they think, and if those "others" don't agree with them, those "others" are stupid.
|
Great post. I agree that he was wrong to state that the vast majority want a playoff. I am only recently warming to the idea, but it is only because I realize that we can't go back to the old system. I'm about to turn 33. I can remeber the old system quite vividly, when beating scUM and getting to the Rose Bowl was everything. The BCS has ruined that. I didn't mind the idea of a split NC. However, now that CFB has moved into this new era of "definitive" national championships (yeah right, just ask USC), I find myself moving on. The bowls are so commericial now that it ruins the special feel. I also hate the idea that a team can get into the NC game by another team losing. That just seems more wrong to me than a "wildcard" winning it all.
Mandel is not correct in asserting that everybody wants a playoff. I think he is correct that the vast majority of fans don't like the current BCS system. I think it boils do to the simple fact that the BCS created a "National Championship Game" but not a great method to determine who gets to play in that game.
One of the strongest arguments I have seen against a playoff system is that it would render the regular season games "meaningless." Someone asked would the OSU v. Texas games have been as meaningful had they not been "elimination" games for the NC. I say that I cannot answer that. I would not have enjoyed watching those games any less as a Buckeye fan. Maybe the wider audience would not have found those games as appealing.
I've also seen some arguements like Pittsburgh wasn't the best team in the NFL last year and how can you have a wildcard Super Bowl champ? I honestly don't think there is a solid way to refute this argument. You either except it or you don't. It all boils down to where you draw the line for who "deserves" a chance at the championship.
My argument for a playoff comes down to 2 main reasons:
1. I think it gives us the opportunity to see more great match ups both in the regular season non-conference and in the play offs.
2. The NC is decided on the field and not subjectively by voters (although I admit the criteria for who gets in and the seeds would have to be partially subjective)
Wow, I've at least narrowed my reasons from 6 to 2.
__________________
|
11-30-2006, 03:49 PM
|
 |
Cognoscente of Omphaloskepsis
Senior Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,886
Points: 1,056,741.16
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,056,741.16
|
|
Quote:
|
The NC is decided on the field
|
This oft repeated single statement is the fallacy upon which all playoff arguments are based. It just isn't true. The best team that day wins the game - not the best team that year.
Villanova proved it. Wild Card teams in football and baseball have proven it. Contrary to what talking heads everywhere keep saying CFB is the one sport that comes closest to crowning the best team FOR THAT SEASON than any other major sport.
We are nearing the end of a 14 week playoff that has featured countless games with title implications. March Madness makes for a nice March. Only CFB makes for an exciting and meaningful season from August into January. |
12-03-2006, 02:07 AM
|
 |
Hall of Fame
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,909
Points: 55,114.66
Bank: 3,787.57
Total Points: 58,902.23
|
|
|
playoffs have to come.
All experts/fans thought USC was a sure win but, 98% were all wrong.
Now florida or scum. They all say florida but, fine the answer on the field.
herby/corso were saying playoffs will never come because, Presidents from all the colleges can just say no and don't have to give up why. Must be nice to have some pathetic people that probably never played sports making the decisions.
Most coaches and most interviews on espn want playoffs some how. All say BCS needs to be gone with it only being correct once.
|
12-03-2006, 11:23 AM
|
 |
96 days until The Game 2008
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,779
Points: 9,540,934.86
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 9,540,934.86
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oh8ch
This oft repeated single statement is the fallacy upon which all playoff arguments are based. It just isn't true. The best team that day wins the game - not the best team that year.
Villanova proved it. Wild Card teams in football and baseball have proven it. Contrary to what talking heads everywhere keep saying CFB is the one sport that comes closest to crowning the best team FOR THAT SEASON than any other major sport.
We are nearing the end of a 14 week playoff that has featured countless games with title implications. March Madness makes for a nice March. Only CFB makes for an exciting and meaningful season from August into January.
|
I've never been able to express this sentiment so concisely. Well said and obviously I agree 100%.
Given the overwhelming passion people have for CFB a playoff is just going to make the griping about something else, you'll never eliminate it. | |
