| Football Recruiting OSU football recruiting, moderated. Post responsibly and with respect for players and coaches. Rumors and speculation should be clearly labeled as such. |
|
View Poll Results: Is their a bias in recruiting rankings?
|
|
yes
|
  
|
38 |
97.44% |
|
no
|
  
|
1 |
2.56% |
06-26-2006, 03:54 PM
|
 |
# 33
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 947
Points: 3,635.24
Bank: 3.26
Total Points: 3,638.51
|
|
|
Recruiting Bias
Simple question,
Do you think that all the major scout associations ex. scout,rivals,super prep have a bias on how the players are rated across the country. It seems like most of the midwest/ohio players are not rated as high as most of the players around the country. Though i know that this doesnt mean anything it still annoys the shit out of me. tOSU seems to pump out pros just as much as an USC,UF,UM but the players they do make into pros are not in as high of regard as the players that go to other schools.
__________________
 Ohio-The greatest state of them all
|
06-26-2006, 03:57 PM
|
 |
I think. Therefore, I am
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 25,781
Points: 3,186,387.94
Bank: 0.51
Total Points: 3,186,388.46
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by buckeye247
Simple question,
Do you think that all the major scout associations ex. scout,rivals,super prep have a bias on how the players are rated across the country. It seems like most of the midwest/ohio players are not rated as high as most of the players around the country. Though i know that this doesnt mean anything it still annoys the shit out of me. tOSU seems to pump out pros just as much as an USC,UF,UM but the players they do make into pros are not in as high of regard as the players that go to other schools.
|
I've heard this is a "down" year for Ohio talent (in terms of depth, that is the top 10 are still very very good, but the next 10 aren't as good as year's past. (And I'm just using the number 10, it's not a "real" line somewhere))
I'd say the "bias" is more noticeable when a recruit commits and someone else magically becomes the "#1 RB in the Nation!!!" Or some stuff.. and it's a Bias towards making money, not region.
__________________
 
"Reality is merely a framework for imagination" 9/25/05
"I am firmly convinced that Charlie Weis didn't have any idea as to how good the Buckeyes were defensively." - Brent Musburger
I'd rather be a prison whore than root for Michigan --- Long live the PCP
|
06-26-2006, 04:03 PM
|
 |
Pure Rock Fury
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,604
Points: 1,060,698.45
Bank: 82,079.10
Total Points: 1,142,777.55
|
|
|
the fact is that those serivces are there to do two things...bring recruiting info to the mainstream and make money. what is more interesting? an update from the #1 RB who has been committed to the same school for 6 months or an update from the NEW #1 RB who is announcing on Signing Day. I think Rivals tends to show their bias more towards kids who commit early, whereas Scout seems to show their bias towards kids who do not participate at Scout-sponsored camps.
|
06-26-2006, 04:10 PM
|
 |
Haaaang on Sloopy, Sloopy Hang on!! O.. H.. I.. O.
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,458
Points: 144,112.67
Bank: 2,644.20
Total Points: 146,756.87
|
|
|
There also may be a certain bias to certain school (Bell Glades, Long Beach Poly, and yes even Glenville). If a school has a history of producing talents recruits, then IMO the recruiting services look at those schools and may give more attention to these guys while rating a mid-level D1 guy higher then what he really should be.
__________________
"Oh come let's sing Ohio's praise, and songs to Alma Mater raise;
While our hearts rebounding thrill, with joy which death alone can still;
Summer's heat or winter's cold, the seasons pass the years will roll;
Time and change will surely show, How firm thy friendship ... OHIO!"
|
06-26-2006, 05:29 PM
|
 |
Watson, Crick & A Twist
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,893
Points: 180,245.81
Bank: 0.28
Total Points: 180,246.09
|
|
|
Bias in recruiting rankings? Certainly. Regional, perhaps - as one service might have better scouting in one region than another. Bias in terms of pumping the next best can't miss sub 4.3 speed freak of nature (who hasn't committed to a school) absolutely.
__________________
Now the TP is in the Fold a new Sig Pic is Needed
|
06-26-2006, 05:49 PM
|
 |
Woody Rules!
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,714
Points: 595.44
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 595.44
|
|
|
the bias is self-evident.
It seems to be getting more pronounced each year, as well.
$$ has a way of doing that, you know.
__________________
"A quest for self respect proves its lack" A. Rand
|
06-26-2006, 06:08 PM
|
 |
Rental car smells like pork rinds
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 20,329
Points: 2,006,622.56
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 2,006,622.56
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wadc45
I think Rivals tends to show their bias more towards kids who commit early, whereas Scout seems to show their bias towards kids who do not participate at Scout-sponsored camps.
|
I think you mean biased against, but I get your drift and I wholeheartedly agree. Many of the recruit rankings are utter BS
Edited for language - Nutty
__________________
Last edited by BuckNutty : 06-26-2006 at 06:46 PM.
|
|
