| Football Recruiting OSU football recruiting, moderated. Post responsibly and with respect for players and coaches. Rumors and speculation should be clearly labeled as such. |
08-21-2007, 02:22 PM
|
 |
Senior
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 230
Points: 251,215.18
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 251,215.18
|
|
|
I think the Bucks take 4 OL's in 2009. The class will number about 24. That is a large class. Bollman is very selective in what he is looking for. The Bucks appear to be going with a Jenkins or bust approach to 2008. I'm not sure Sanders or German get an offer at this point.
|
08-21-2007, 02:22 PM
|
 |
Embrace the Chaos
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 15,636
Points: 14,429.08
Bank: 10,629.86
Total Points: 25,058.95
|
|
I like to think that OL kids have a different lunch pail attitude than RBs, WRs, skill position guys.
Maybe I'm living in a fantasy world on this? 
__________________
An army of principles can penetrate where an army of soldiers cannot.
Thomas Payne
|
08-21-2007, 02:25 PM
|
 |
Pure Rock Fury
Administrator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,855
Points: 3,327,682.77
Bank: 84,240.04
Total Points: 3,411,922.81
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckrock
I think the Bucks take 4 OL's in 2009. The class will number about 24. That is a large class. Bollman is very selective in what he is looking for. The Bucks appear to be going with a Jenkins or bust approach to 2008. I'm not sure Sanders or German get an offer at this point.
|
Let me solve half that riddle for you...Sanders will not be getting an offer...period, paragraph. |
08-21-2007, 02:58 PM
|
 |
09-01-07
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,656
Points: 452,893.80
Bank: 0.24
Total Points: 452,894.05
|
|
|
I'm happy with having at least 10 on schollie (enough to field a 2 deep of scholarship players) and fill in the rest with quality walk-ons. Well "happy" isn't the word, more like "easier to deal with."
|
08-21-2007, 03:14 PM
|
|
Senior
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 230
Points: 251,215.18
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 251,215.18
|
|
|
Thanks Wadc45. Do you know why the staff is not high on Sanders? Is it because we already have 2 OT's in this class?
|
08-21-2007, 03:17 PM
|
|
Hall of Fame
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,044
Points: 14,776.08
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 14,776.08
|
|
|
Wouldn't it be pretty easy to get 4 solid in-state linemen next season? Harris and Hall look like early offers. McShane from Walsh Jesuit is very good from what I've been hearing. I don't think we'll be getting elite OOS linemen next year(maybe on defense), but getting 4 or 5 instaters shouldn't be very difficult.
|
08-21-2007, 03:18 PM
|
 |
Mr. Mom
Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,022
Points: 25,151.86
Bank: 45,848.05
Total Points: 70,999.91
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckrock
Thanks Wadc45. Do you know why the staff is not high on Sanders? Is it because we already have 2 OT's in this class?
|
Pretty much... I believe that Adams and Shugarts (and possibly even Brewster) were higher on the OT board for the staff... Reasons for that are thought to be because Sanders is not adept at run-blocking (due to Northmont's spread offense; think Connor Smith in reverse)... Also there have been questions about his disposition and ability to give consistent effort on the field...
Zebrie's a big block of clay right now... Needs to hit the weights and work on his run-blocking, but he's got the frame and long-arms that coaches look for...
__________________
 
|
08-21-2007, 03:21 PM
|
|
Mr. Mom
Moderator
|
|
|
| | |
