| Open Discussion (Work-safe) Open-topic moderated forum. Any all-ages-appropriate topic (within reason) is appropriate here as long as they can be discussed with at least a degree of tact, civility, and respect for differing opinions. |
|
View Poll Results: T & A everywhere, nowhere, or only somewhere?
|
|
Avatars must be unquestionably clean, sig's allowed PG13
|
   
|
29 |
36.25% |
|
Avatars and Sig's both unquestionably clean
|
  
|
10 |
12.50% |
|
No restrictions for either
|
  
|
32 |
40.00% |
|
Other (please explain)
|
  
|
9 |
11.25% |
10-20-2005, 11:36 AM
|
 |
The Most Power-Drunk
Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,024
Points: 354,592.20
Bank: 71,776.81
Total Points: 426,369.01
|
|
|
T & A everywhere, somewhere, or nowhere?
Vote for what you think. If you're confused as to where this came from, read the BP discussion poll started by 21. Or at least read from page 10 on. Ok, I'll sum up:
Some users are a little frustrated (understandably so) because of the seeming increase in T&A in avatars and sig's. BP is a community where we are encouraged to make of it what we will, so let's have your opinions. Some want less T&A because they post a lot at work. Others don't care. Keep in mind there is a feature wherein a user can disable avatars, sig's, or both, but many users like the majority of them, so don't want to resort to using this feature. Tell us what you think.
__________________
THE Ohio State University
Tradition
Honor
Excellence
|
10-20-2005, 11:37 AM
|
 |
Tanned Fat Looks Better
Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,890
Points: 263,489.62
Bank: 1.05
Total Points: 263,490.67
|
|
|
are you gonna make this a poll, or do you just want us to voice our opinion?
I know this place is very against censorship, but I think limiting T&A is a good idea... at least keep it out of avatars. I have sigs turned off anyways because it makes the boards much easier to read, so I don't care if there is T&A there.
|
10-20-2005, 11:41 AM
|
|
The Most Power-Drunk
Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,024
Points: 354,592.20
Bank: 71,776.81
Total Points: 426,369.01
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScarletInMyVeins
are you gonna make this a poll, or do you just want us to voice our opinion?
I know this place is very against censorship, but I think limiting T&A is a good idea... at least keep it out of avatars. I have sigs turned off anyways because it makes the boards much easier to read, so I don't care if there is T&A there.
|
Relax, trigger, I was working on it... 
__________________
THE Ohio State University
Tradition
Honor
Excellence
|
10-20-2005, 11:43 AM
|
 |
The Wolverines!!
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,868
Points: 5,442,110.11
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 5,442,110.11
|
|
|
You can turn sigs and avatars off so I chose other.
Most avatars aren't that bad in my opinion.
|
10-20-2005, 11:43 AM
|
 |
Squirrelmonkeys
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,663
Points: 119.90
Bank: 157.43
Total Points: 277.33
|
|
|
Avatars should be clean, IMO. Sigs I don't really care about. T&A pictures in threads are ok as long as the number of them don't get too out of hand.
__________________
"Hell our linebacker can run step for step with Ginn." - UTMNC
|
10-20-2005, 11:45 AM
|
|
Tanned Fat Looks Better
Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,890
Points: 263,489.62
Bank: 1.05
Total Points: 263,490.67
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Thump
You can turn sigs and avatars off so I chose other.
Most avatars aren't that bad in my opinion.
|
The thing about avatars is, that's how most people identify which poster is which... I rarely look at peoples monikers because I have the avatars memorized... except for Jwins', he changes his avatar like underwear. If I had to turn off avatars because of questionable content, I'd be confused for weeks. |
10-20-2005, 11:45 AM
|
 |
NXE BEARD.. GO BUCKS!
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,271
Points: 601.19
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 601.19
|
|
|
Do people act like the entire family sits down and looks at this message board like it is TV or something? I don't get it.
I voted no restrictions, rock on.
|
10-20-2005, 11:50 AM
|
 |
misunderestimated
| | |
