Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxBuck
My bet is terrorist attack. But time will tell.
|
No need to invoke terrorists - first they would (I believe) target a more iconic structure second the MNDOT already knew that the bridge was constructed without sufficient redundancy. This deficiency could only be completely corrected by a complete rebuild.
The 89 page MNDOT report by UM CE department is
here in PDF format.
In 2005 MNDOT inspection reported the bridge to be structurally deficient. The bridge was effectively slated for future replacement.
Basically, the problem can be stated thusly.
The bridge was built to accept a lower flow of traffic than it was forced to accept. The acceptance criteria for the bridge load as constructed in 1967 assumed a constant load, rather than a real life periodic cyclic stress load. The load factor equations used in '67 would never be used today in making a new bridge - being very unconservative.
Failure mode - I fully expect the failure mode to be one that is illustrated by a flexing stress model. That is, like a paper clip being bent to and fro by hand, the steel connectors and trusses in the bridge were being bent and relaxed through a range of motion - the amplitude of which depends on the mass of the passing traffic. Because of increased load that range of motion and magnitude of stress is greater than the '67 unconservative design assumed. Without sufficient redundancy the trusses and other structural members will eventually fail under the applied load. Like the paper clip illustration, at some point, the metal will begin to form minute cracks which then propagate, till there is catastrophic failure.
Because of the lack of redundancy in the structure, once a major section fails the remainder cannot support the structural or passing load and the whole thing comes down like a house of cards.
This was simply a case of an accident waiting to happen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CleveBucks
Didn't something like this happen in Oklahoma a few years ago?
|
Webber Falls on the I-40, initiated by a barge collision, also believed to be promoted by structural deficiency (lack of redundancy).
The original CNN report of this collapse is
here.