![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Other OSU and Professional Sports Non-specific moderated forum for any and all OSU or pro sports not covered within their own forums. Including recruiting, in-game updates and former players. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
|
2009-2010 NHL thread
For general stuff, especially since the season is all of 3 months away
![]() just for starters, here is how San Jose is screwing themselves this year.. Quote:
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
I'd imagine that Cheechoo would be intriguing to some teams. He shouldn't be worth too much at this point. I don't get to watch the Sharks much, but I hear he's a shell of his former self. Still, if he gets half the skill back that he had when he was scoring with the best in the league, he'd be a nice asset for many teams.
Also curious what the Flyers are going to do. I don't know their cap situation exactly, but I'm pretty sure they need to dump a contract somehow. I think Briere has a NMC and he'd probably be the dude they want to get rid of. |
|
|||||||||
|
Big rumor.. Andrew Rothstein (PuckProspectus) on Twitter
Basically this is it: Chicago gives up Versteeg, Campbell, most likely a first round pick and Huet for Marleau, Kaberle and Nabakov. San Jose gives up Marleau, Nabakov and Cheechoo for Blake, Huet, and a pick (Chicago's?) Toronto gives up Blake and Kaberle for Versteeg, Campbell and Cheechoo. San Jose can't be that desperate. It looks like a Chicago fan's dream of a trade. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
That's not how Brian Burke (Toronto's GM) builds teams. He doesn't start out with high-priced veterans as his core and that's certainly what that trade would bring to Toronto. San Jose isn't going to give up on Nabby (they don't have much behind him) and their minor league system sucks. And Chicago isn't exactly in the position to be wheeling and dealing anyway since they will have that RFA qualifying offer screw up hanging over them. |
|
|||||||||
|
They might be able to wheel and deal, but not with Campbell.
|
|
|||||||||
|
Isn't the Cap expected to drop significantly in 2010/11 ?
Burke just signed Beauchemin (sp) to a 3 year 11.4MM contract, paving the way for a TK trade. Any Leafs fans know when Burke is going to get some offense ? |
|
|||||||||
|
Didn't figure he'd fetch that much.
|
|
|||||||||
|
And now if the Habs get rid of the Kos[censored]yn sisters they might get somewhere.
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Not happening. BTW the NHLPA filed a grievance - it appears that Versteeg may be the odd man out since Barker resigned already (and cost himself a ton of $$$ on the open market IMO) NHLPA files grievance for mishandled qualifying offers |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
pronger wants a flyers extension (or so he says now) Pronger wants to work out extension with Flyers |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
team roster players-need to sign cap space left (cap space per player available) wings 23-0 221k (0) bruins 19-3 1.27m (423k) flames 19-3 1.3m (434k) sharks 16-6 1.35m (224k) flyers 19-3 1.8m (609k) sens 24-0 2.045m (0) pens 19-3 2.96m (986k) nucks 16-6 8.29m (1.3m) habs 16-6 8.84m (1.4m) hawks 17-5 5.9m (1.2m) sabres 15-7 9.6m (1.4m) aves 15-7 11m (1.6m) rangers 14-8 13.6m (1.7m) |
|
|||||||||
|
Question for you, jo. How does a franchise's farm system affect the roster/salary cap situations? Are minor leaguers considered under contract by their local team, and if called up, only then would their contract count against the NHL cap? I'm assuming it would have to be bumped up to the NHL minimum, at that point. Mainly wondering if an NHL team facing serious cap issues could call up a couple players as "place holders" until some personnel changes could be worked out.
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|