Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketman
Maybe it's because I'm a minority, so I'm way, way sensitive to race issues, but I totally saw Clinton's assertion of Obama being a good VP as patronizing blacks in the South. "Obama can't be a good President, but he can be a good VP - don't shoot for the stars, but don't worry because the white candidate knows what's best." A huge stretch, I know, but that's what I was thinking when I heard that.
To corroborate my notion, Obama responded to Hillary's VP offer in a speech in Mississippi by taking words right out of Malcolm X's dictionary - telling the crowd that they were being hoodwinked and bamboozled by Hillary. Very powerful stuff if you think about the context.
|
I saw it that way too. My first thoughts were that she's saying, "Obama, you can come along for the ride but it's going to be in the back of the bus." She damn well knows what she is doing too. Hillary is not stupid. She didn't disavow Ferraro like she should have either. She knows the black vote is gone to her in the primary and that she needs white people (who might be luke warm to a woman president) to vote for her. Obama hasn't "exploited" the black vote. He hasn't pandered to black audiences. He's running on a platform that is appealing to a wide audience and naturally there is a certain pride for African-Americans to be drawn to a positive black candidate. I saw a clip of Chris Rock introducing Obama a few months ago at the Apollo and he said something like "It's good to see you supporting him early. You'd be sorry if he won and you voted for the white lady." It wasn't a knock on Clinton, just a reality.
I found that Ferraro's comments were particularly in poor taste because she basically said that the
only reason Obama has come so far is because he is black. To use Obama's words, it is "absurd." His being black helps him with some voters and hurts him with others. Yes, it is an important part of his background, identity, and unique perspective and message. I would argue with her that John Edwards is the rebuttal for her assertions. Edwards has a similar background (short time in Senate) and reformist message. If Obama had not been in this campaign, I'd speculate that he would be in a similar position to Obama right now (he'd get a bit more of the white male vote and Hillary would be pulling more of the black vote). Obama didn't knock out Edwards because he was black, he did it by having a better tweaked message and better organization. Face it, there are a lot of ABC (anybody but Clinton) voters and somebody would be getting that vote. Hillary appears to me to be attempting to create anybody but Obama voters, and she's implicitly making his race one of the reasons.
Edit:
Clarence Page, Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for the
Chicago Tribune just made the Edward comparison on MSNBC, guess I'm not a total loon.
