![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Political Conversation and Debate This forum is not a temporary one. It will exist up to, and after the presidential elections. Some people want to talk or even argue politics, other's don't. Let's see if we can apply some reason and understanding to the debate. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
|
Having read Muck's valid arguments for use of Blackwater mercs, I think the bigger issue is still our governments finding ways to oversee their operations. And better oversight of monies spent in Iraq in general.
Can anyone deny that it is a bad situation when mercs shoot innocent bystanders during operations? (and don't give me any of that;"it always happens [censored]!) And it is a big negative toward getting the people(Iraqis) to buy into what we are trying to accomplish and their own government. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
A quick question on this, because I don't actually know -- are armed contractors subject to the UCMJ (uniform code of military justice)?
What body would oversee the prosecution of a contractor who violates military law? Are they subject to court-martial? Or is this a situation of Goreian "no controlling legal authority"? |
|
|||||||||
|
Blackwater?s Legal Netherworld
Private security contractors are subject to military justice ? or are they? By Mark Hemingway In the reams of media coverage surrounding the Blackwater incident last week one curious detail remains virtually unreported. The general theme of the coverage remains that private military contractors are somehow ?above the law,? but almost no media sources have referred to the fact that, as of last fall, contractors are subject to the same to the same Uniform Code of Military Justice that governs U.S. soldiers. ![]() ![]() In theory, Blackwater contractors could be court martialed for wrong doing, a prospect that should satisfy all critics who insist that private military companies remain unaccountable. However, even before the change there was no lack of applicable laws to which contractors were subject. The truth is that contractors are not above the law, but rather well within the reach of several different codes and regulations and nobody?s exactly sure how one would go about exacting legal remedies against them should they be needed. Mark Hemingway on Blackwater on National Review Online= It would seem Blackwater would come under UCMJ. But, when has any Blackwater employee ever been prosecuted? I doubt you will ever see that. Last edited by Taosman; 10-14-2007 at 07:34 PM. |
|
|||||||||
|
AP
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
We have always had the ability to push al Qaeda out of areas, we just can't stay and "hold" areas.
|
|
|||||||||
|
Sounds like a sticky situation.
|
|
|||||||||
|
Blackwater was given a free pass by the White House because of political connections. They blew it by acting like cowboys. It's the friggin wild west over there. Bad for public relations. Bad for the Iraq effort.
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
Tell us how you really feel, Dayton!
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/17/wa...LPpF7lLO5Jn6yw Given the pronouncements made on this board, it would seem, to the contrary, that military control over the mercenaries is an issue of considerable contention with the SecDef. Then again, I could just--as previously accused--be talking out of my ass. Last edited by ORD_Buckeye; 10-18-2007 at 12:06 PM. |
|
|||||||||
|
It's hard to hold a civilian accountable to rules governed by the UCMJ. For instance, if a married civilian contractor from Blackwater went and had and affair with an Iraqi national, he could be punished under the UCMJ for adultery, and possibly be thrown in the brig (jail).
We have had past instances where a commander in chief was guilty for breaking laws under the UCMJ yet he was not punishable for said laws, even though he was the commander in chief. So, I think there's a hard case to make for UCMJ application here. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Besides Bremer decreed that the Blackwater types were essentially untouchable under Iraqi law back in 2004 I think..... |
|
|||||||||
|
I have to completey disagree. If the mercs signed on to do the job, they should be held accountable. They are heavily armed and supposedly well trained. Better trained the most the troops.
And Iraq is to change the Bremer law shortly............. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|