Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucklion
I don't think there's any question that the speeches have been good for what they needed to be. But, with the exception of Reagan, there really hasn't been too many times that the Dems didn't give better speeches than the Repubs did the past 50 years. Nixon was droll and boring, The Bushes couldn't deliver a speech to save ther lives...and they all managed wins, many times 2 of them. Speeches at conventions are lovely, and if they accomplish actually getting people out to vote, then they have been successful. However, there is a lot of time for the average Joe to forget these speeches before November...it's what happens between now and then that counts. The same, of course, goes for the Repubs.
|
Man, I hate to do it, but I've got to say that you are not giving W enough credit for his 2004 speech. When he referenced the decision he made to go to Iraq, and how difficult he knew it would be for the families involved, he choked up in a way that made him actually believable. He hit that speech out of the park on that issue.
Kerry, on the other hand, had his speech marred by his inability to take in the moment. Everytime the crowd cheered for a good soundbite, he talked them down and didn't bask in the adulation. His speech came off punchy and uncomfortable.
And you saw it in the polls. Bush got a huge convention spike. Kerry got nothing. After the Republican convention, Bush never seriously trailed in the polls again. It was the turning point, in my opinion, of that election.