![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Political Conversation and Debate This forum is not a temporary one. It will exist up to, and after the presidential elections. Some people want to talk or even argue politics, other's don't. Let's see if we can apply some reason and understanding to the debate. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
So that is a good short term side effect of his winning. We'll see how it goes. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
![]() Somehow I think the Ayman Al-Zawahiris, the Ahmadinejads, and Hugo Chavez's of the world will quickly come up with and lob another baseless charge claiming that the wrongs of Montgomery and Selma are far from exorcised. I'd bet the Louis Farrakhans of the world wouldn't disagree. |
|
|||||||||
|
The story is gaining traction. There was quite a discussion on al-Jazeera about it yesterday in relation to the attacks in Mumbai.
|
|
|||||||||
|
A guy who works in our office just told me that California is NOT giving Obama there electoral votes until he comes clean with his birth certificate.. any truth?
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
I suspect this is connected to the Alan Keyes case filed with such a premise. It is not the position of the State of California at all, and the only issue precluding rapid certification of the results in CA is that the State is, well, large, and they are still counting votes. The outcome there isn't in doubt. But, to the point you raise - here is the Honolulu Advertiser article on the case. (Keyes filed suit in many States - presumably including the State of Denial, and the State of Total Inebriation). |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Homey ain't [censored] until he takes the pledge... |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
GSA - Presidential Transition Act of 1963 |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
![]() Anyway, is it his fault the other guy quit early? |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Notably, this letter to a famous supporter is dated December 10th, 1968, fully 6 days before the electors met that year. (Electors meet on the first Monday following the second Wednesday in December of the election year). |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Bottom line is that there is no such official entity as "The Office of the President-Elect". |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
First - there is the neat circular argument: There is a President-Elect, who has an office and thus there is an office, which the President-Elect occupies, which is the office of the President-Elect. Then there is what right-wing pundits are pounding since 11/7 - that there is no elected office of "The President-Elect". What seems to have some like Malkin et al all riled up is that he uses proper capitalization on the words "Office" and "President-Elect." Now, when you boil it all down, it is truly meaningless hot-air on her part. She along with others, conflates the lack of any official (in the Constitution) elected office of "The President-Elect" with what has been, in all transitions save this one, an accepted honorary title for a quasi-governmental office which facilitates the smooth transition from one Presidency to another. True, it is ostentatious for Obama to put it on a placard in front of the podium, but Presidents-Elect Republican and Democrat alike have used the term for decades. Not just Nixon, for example. Quote:
BTW, Bush 43 also used the title - though for fewer days, for obvious reasons. |
|
|||||||||
|
Honestly, there is a power vacuum in the Oval Office. We are in an extraordinary precarious time. With the economy tanking, the war on terror still at max, and the country needing there to be a seamless transition, he apparently decided to take the established title of TPE one step further and add a seal to the existing Office of the President Elect.
When an Obama hater like Lou Dobbs is giving Obama points for trying to fill the power gap left by the current office holder's decision to ramp down his involvement and mentally get back to brush cutting a few months early, it becomes more a choice between being criticized for being ostentatious versus setting a tone that a firm hand is on the tiller waiting to take charge of the economy. The market is one place where perception becomes reality. If he is thought to be weak and indecisive, it can cost our economy. I am happy he chose to try and enhance his prestige as a take charge guy during these troubling times. If I was an anti-Obama guy, then I'd look for reasons to pot shot him. But the trouble is, our problems are such that the need to back our President is more pressing now than at any time. He has displayed a willingness not to be vindictive (see Lieberman and Clinton) and not to be a liberal ideologue (see keeping Gates). I just don't see the criticism as anything more than sour grapes. But I could be wrong and seeing this through my partisan glasses. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| 44th potus, not annointed one |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|