![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Political Conversation and Debate This forum is not a temporary one. It will exist up to, and after the presidential elections. Some people want to talk or even argue politics, other's don't. Let's see if we can apply some reason and understanding to the debate. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
|
Not worth the fight imo. Team GOP needs to gear up for the fight on the Healthcare spend-a-palooza.
I've always viewed SCOTUS nominees as "to the victor, go the spoils" awards for The President. Besides - I've read that Judge Soto is pretty moderate in terms of economic issues, so perhaps we'll luck out. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
dietcoke on keyboard!
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Anyway, provided she vetts out, no need to kick up too much dust over it... if they want a fight, fight over the "Alito" pick, I'm sure this is the "Roberts" pick. Having said that, I worry considering the "vetting" of some of Obama's other appointments... ideology aside, this woman had better be bulletproof personally. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
This is not a nominee that suggests the president is throwing down the ideological gauntlet particularly hard, she should be confirmed fairly quickly, barring any Team Barry vetting fiascoes. Also, FWIW, her original appointment by George Sr. was a result of him playing "one for me, one for you" on judges w/ NY Sen. Moynihan, w/ Judge Sotomayor being Moynihan's pick; at least according to the talking heads on 700 WLW. |
|
|||||||||
|
One comment of Judge Sotomayor's that right-wing bloggers have gotten very exercised about is that the "Court of Appeals is where policy is made." Michelle Malkin is particularly incensed over this remark. Michelle Malkin ? SCOTUS pick: Sonia Sotomayor But I'm not clear on what the basis is for that concern.
Judge Sotomayor did not say that the CofA is where law is made. Rather, it's where policy is made (i.e.: where precedent is set). And she is unequivocally correct in this. It reads to me like Malkin and her ilk need some basic civics lessons. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Absolutely true statement. Look at the Ledbetter case for instance, or in police brutality cases, the Heck case. They determine if you have a case in the latter, and when it has to be filed in the former. All policy arising out of unclear legislation as applied to unforeseen factual scenarios. |
|
|||||||||
|
A latino judge says that a latino woman who has been thru their life can make better decisions than a white male is ok to say? But if a white male says the reverse than he is vilified. Where is the outrage ?
Why is this statment not too racist and sexist for a supreme court judge? |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
I'd like to extend it in a little way. The number of opinions written by Sotomayor - 380+ The number of those opinions to which SCOTUS granted cert - 6 The number of those opinions overturned by SCOTUS - 3 So - percentage of Sotomayor opinions overturned by current SCOTUS - 0.500 (good if you are a baseball player, but this is judging). Percentage of opinions SCOTUS deemed worthy of further consideration - 1.6% Another contextual tidbit - SCOTUS typically reverses a high percentage of opinions they hear - often as high as 75%. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
I'm with BB on this... |
|
|||||||||
|
The O/U is 134
|
|
|||||||||
|
Nobody said latinas make "better" legal decisions. She does bring a wealth of different life experience and a worldview to the bench that an old white man does not have. Different thing.
King and Bestbuckeye ![]() |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|