![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Political Conversation and Debate This forum is not a temporary one. It will exist up to, and after the presidential elections. Some people want to talk or even argue politics, other's don't. Let's see if we can apply some reason and understanding to the debate. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
![]() The ushers wore red jackets if i remember correctly....when Eddie George played or when I went to school there (Gary Williams and Doug Donley).... |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
But I'm willing to keep an open mind. ![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
Just the dogs are Buckeye fans......
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
You've got the concession guys inside as well (I believe that's them in unspeakable colors):
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
But if you don't like the way things appear to be handled in the political forum, there's an easy solution - you can simply stop posting in it. Numerous moderators spend a lot of time trying to handle things in the political forum. Please remember that these are unpaid volunteers. It may be worth pointing out to you that the one person that I know who was banned from the poli forum (without being banned completely on other occasions) is someone that has opposite views from yours on most political issues (Taosman). I believe that's evidence that one set of political views isn't favored overall by the moderators as a group. By the way, the post I quoted could be hit with an infraction for ding whining. Also, FYI, there is an infraction category for 'Arguing with moderators'. I'm not mentioning those to be threatening - I'm pointing out that moderators have shown a great deal of patience with you regarding these issues. But I believe from some of the recent posts that the level of patience is wearing thin. So to put this in terms that I think you can relate to - if you want to stay out of the 'penalty box', I think you may want to reevaluate your reactions to these changes. |
|
|||||||||
|
So I post link with no commentary and I get warned
http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/1526327-post148.html Nothing happens. Gotcha |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
The rule is to not offer articles without commentary. You offered article without commentary and received a 0 points warning for not commenting on the article. Do you mean "nothing happened" because it should have been an infraction (or forum ban, nobody wants poli stuff to affect the other boards)? |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Check the dates, Dayton..... the post you cite was made before the notification of the "crack down" on old rules. Sushi's post was made 8-31-09. This thread started on 9-4-09 I think you'll find a great many of your prior posts (prior to 9-4-09, that is) had gone warning-less as well... I recommend you carry on any more complaining in private message. |
|
|||||||||
|
Dayton, that sounds like a seriously age-regressive argument. You're better than that.
As an aside, all this chatter about someone-did-it-why-can't-I seems odd to me for three reasons. First, the mods aren't going to catch everything. Nor should they have to. Hasn't self-policing always been our way here? Most issues are handled via PM, and warnings aren't visible, so nobody can actually say if someone "got away" with a post or not. Third, the idea isn't to lower everyone to the standard of whomever got away with the worst post, but to raise the conversation so the average post is much better. Please explain why you oppose this idea; I'm utterly perplexed at the whole anti-improvement movement going on in here. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|