![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Professional Baseball Moderated. MLB, former Buckeyes all fair game. |
| View Poll Results: Who is the best OVERALL baseball player ever? | |||
| Babe Ruth |
|
27 | 60.00% |
| "Shoeless" Joe Jackson |
|
1 | 2.22% |
| Pete Rose |
|
7 | 15.56% |
| Ted Williams |
|
1 | 2.22% |
| Other-----Please explain your selection |
|
9 | 20.00% |
| Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
|
Well, beside Cory Snyder, I'd agree with The Babe. The numbers he was putting up were unreal compared to the competition. He would have been a HoF'er even if he had never picked up a bat because he was that good of a pitcher.
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
I am honestly surprised that this is even up for debate.
It's Babe Ruth and then everybody else. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Thanks a ton. Searching mlb.com was ridiculous. I couldn't even find a way to sort teams by their 2006 stats. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Note - not necessarily in order Ruth Williams Cobb Gehrig Mays Aaron Foxx Hornsby Musial Bonds I would also have Mantle and Dimaggio ahead of Rose, and probably a few more guys, but I won't name any more, since I don't want to be nitpicked on close calls, or debate guys like Joe Jackson and Josh Gibson. And I loved watching Pete play - I think he belongs in the HOF, just not in the top-10 of all time list. Last edited by BB73; 03-28-2007 at 01:26 PM. |
|
|||||||||
|
Rose is my favorite player of all-time but his longevity gave him those gawdy numbers, not overwhelming talent.
The guy outworked every guy in the majors. |
|
|||||||||
|
I don't know how you think it's so obviously the Babe when he couldn't do anything when it comes to defense. My vote goes to Ty Cobb.
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Imagine Greg Maddux but hitting 130 home runs a year. That was Babe Ruth. Here's a link to his pitching and hitting stats. http://mlb.mlb.com/stats/historical/...layerID=121578 Last edited by Thump; 03-28-2007 at 01:55 PM. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Not at the same time. Imagine Maddux going from dominate pitcher of his day and then becoming the greatest power hitter of all-time. Again, this guy hit more home runs himself than some teams and this was while playing in gargantuan stadiums. Not wiffle fields like those of today. |
|
|||||||||
|
Ruth had a .968 fielding percentage while Mays had a .981.
Was Mays a better fielder, yes. But far better, not so much. Besides, Ruth was a MUCH better pitcher than Mays. Ted Williams had a .974 as an outfielder as well. Not a lot of disparity in regards to fielding. BTW, I love these kind of baseball debates. |
|
|||||||||
|
Come on, Thump, you should know that fielding percentage doesn't translate as an accurate comparison between two players such as Ruth and Mays who do not play the same position. IMO, suggesting that Mays was not a far better fielder than Ruth is ridiculous.
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
We're comparing outfielders. The best way to compare is stats. |
|
|||||||||
|
Ruth didn't play center. Comparing left or right to center is as ridiculous as comparing second base to center IMO.
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|