| Professional Basketball Moderated. NBA, former Buckeyes all fair game. |
04-13-2007, 05:03 PM
|
 |
Loves Buckeye History
Senior Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24,894
Points: 543,245,866.60
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 543,245,866.60
|
|
|
If I'm reading that correctly - the NCAA became aware of the $6,000 on May 14th, 2004. And because they sent notice of to the University on May 13th, 2005, but it didn't arrive until May 16th, 2005, O'Brien's violation on the matter was rescinded since the University received notification more than 1 year after the NCAA learned of the matter.
But didn't the University tell the NCAA to begin with? What an inane technicality.
__________________
"I'm not looking to have the biggest package in the world - I'm looking to have the most efficient one." - Jim Tressel
|
04-13-2007, 05:09 PM
|
 |
Hall of Fame
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,490
Points: 400,297.97
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 400,297.97
|
|
|
And that's the whole story. The NCAA missed the statute of limitations. O'Brien's infractions have essentially been wiped out including the show cause order he was under if he sought employment as a coach at an NCAA member school.
|
04-13-2007, 05:23 PM
|
|
Loves Buckeye History
Senior Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24,894
Points: 543,245,866.60
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 543,245,866.60
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LightningRod
And that's the whole story. The NCAA missed the statute of limitations. O'Brien's infractions have essentially been wiped out including the show cause order he was under if he sought employment as a coach at an NCAA member school.
|
It looked like all infractions surrounding Savovic still stood, although most of those were attributed to Biancardi.
This sure won't help the University's case against O'Brien, though.
__________________
"I'm not looking to have the biggest package in the world - I'm looking to have the most efficient one." - Jim Tressel
|
04-13-2007, 06:15 PM
|
 |
Still fortitudinous
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,498
Points: 6,147.87
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 6,147.87
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BB73
If I'm reading that correctly - the NCAA became aware of the $6,000 on May 14th, 2004. And because they sent notice of to the University on May 13th, 2005, but it didn't arrive until May 16th, 2005, O'Brien's violation on the matter was rescinded since the University received notification more than 1 year after the NCAA learned of the matter.
But didn't the University tell the NCAA to begin with? What an inane technicality.
|
Talk about good luck for OB. 
__________________
|
04-13-2007, 06:18 PM
|
 |
Watson, Crick & A Twist
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,415
Points: 1,457,769.03
Bank: 0.28
Total Points: 1,457,769.32
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LightningRod
And that's the whole story. The NCAA missed the statute of limitations. O'Brien's infractions have essentially been wiped out including the show cause order he was under if he sought employment as a coach at an NCAA member school.
|
I thought that the show cause order was remanded to the Committee on Infractions for reconsideration. O'Brien probably will see some reduction in the show cause - but it is unclear that the show cause penalty will be revoked in full.
__________________
"They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it is not half so bad as a lot of ignorance." - Terry Pratchett
|
04-13-2007, 06:31 PM
|
|
Hall of Fame
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,490
Points: 400,297.97
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 400,297.97
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandgk
I thought that the show cause order was remanded to the Committee on Infractions for reconsideration. O'Brien probably will see some reduction in the show cause - but it is unclear that the show cause penalty will be revoked in full.
|
You are correct. I misread the show cause discussion. |
04-13-2007, 06:35 PM
|
 |
Woody is my hero
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,690
Points: 200,165.29
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 200,165.29
| | |
