• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Graduation rates up for athletes, down for football

BB73

Loves Buckeye History
Staff member
Bookie
'16 & '17 Upset Contest Winner
si.com
Overall graduation rates slightly rise

Men's basketball, football and baseball continue to fall

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- An overall increase of 1 percentage point in graduation rates might not seem significant. NCAA president Myles Brand disagrees.

For the second straight year, the NCAA released figures showing more than more three-quarters of college athletes, 77 percent, graduate within six years, a slight increase over last year's 76 percent.

"One percent is good, very good," Brand said Wednesday when the NCAA released new figures on the graduation success rate. "Most importantly, if you look at all the trends in each subgroup, we're seeing equal or better trend lines."

The study included 93,000 Division I athletes, almost all on scholarship, who entered college from 1996 to 1999.

All sports, regardless of gender, had higher graduation rates under the NCAA's formula than those calculated under federal guidelines. The difference in the totals is a result of the NCAA now including transfers in graduation rates, something the federal numbers do not take into account. Brand said the distinction is that the federal study misses about 35 percent of athletes, which is why only about 68,000 athletes were included in the federal numbers.

This is the second year the NCAA has released its own data. Athletes in 35 sports -- 17 men's and 18 women's -- were evaluated. Graduation among male athletes increased from 69 percent to 70 percent, while female athletes remained at 86 percent for a second year.

As usual, men's basketball, football and baseball were the lowest-ranked sports.

But NCAA officials even took solace in those numbers, pointing out graduation rates in football have been steadily increasing.

"If you look at the year-by-year studies for football and men's basketball over the last five years, we're very pleased with the steady academic performance from '95 to '99," NCAA vice president Kevin Lennon said.

Brand attributed the increases to a series of academic reforms that have already been put in place and believes the trend can continue if more academic measures are approved.

His goal is to reach 80 percent overall rate in the next five years, a number Brand calls a realistic challenge.

"A move from 76 to 77 percent doesn't sound like much, but when you get these high numbers, it is of consequence," he said. "But good enough is never good enough, and I believe we can stretch it even further."

Men's basketball again had the worst graduation rate of any sport, 59 percent, but the NCAA number was much higher than the federal figure (45 percent). Baseball and football were the next lowest, with both showing 65 percent of athletes graduate. The federal numbers showed football with a 55 percent graduation rate and baseball at 46 percent.

Conversely, 82 percent of women's basketball players graduated, 17 percentage points higher than the federal number. But that was the third lowest rate on the women's side.

Like the overall number, football and men's and women's basketball both showed 1 percentage point gains over 2005. Baseball's number held steady.
Among The Associated Press' Top 25 football teams, five schools met or exceeded the national average with Notre Dame leading the way at 95 percent. The others were Nebraska at 88 percent, Florida at 80 percent, TCU at 78 percent and Clemson at 77. The NCAA's figure for Florida nearly doubled the 42 percent rate from the federal report.

Three of the Top 25 schools had graduation rates below 50 percent. They were Texas (40 percent), Georgia (41) and California (44).

Top-ranked Ohio State and Southern California, the 2004 national
champion, both came in at 55 percent.

Last season's national basketball champion, Florida, received a perfect 100 percent from the NCAA, while last year's women's basketball champion, Maryland, was at 71 percent.

"The good news is we are continuing to make overall progress," Brand said. "The trend lines are up and, with a few exceptions, the academic reforms we are continuing to lay, even in sports like football and basketball which historically lag, are showing progress."

Sports with the highest percentage of graduates were all on the women's side: fencing, field hockey, gymnastics and skiing all had a 94 percent graduation rate. Women's lacrosse was next at 93 percent, and women's swimming was 91 percent. Only one sport, women's bowling, produced a number lower than the national average -- 70 percent.
No men's sport topped 90 percent.

The highest rated men's sports were skiing (89 percent), lacrosse (88 percent), fencing (87 percent), gymnastics (86 percent) and water polo (85 percent). Men's ice hockey, men's swimming and men's tennis also topped 80 percent.

Eighteen of the sports equaled the national improvement with a 1 percentage point increase over last year. Six sports showed no change.

Only four sports -- men's and women's lacrosse, men's water polo and women's bowling had lower graduation rates. Both lacrosse teams dropped by 1 percentage point, while men's water polo and women's bowling each had 2-point decreases.

Women's rifle, which improved from 73 percent to 78 percent, had the largest one-year gain. Men's ice hockey and men's skiing were next with 4-point increases followed by wrestling, which went from 66 percent to 69 percent.

The NCAA plans to release overall graduation rates for each school later this year.
 
Under the new rules, don't schools lose scholarships depending on what their average graduation rates are for all sports, or is it based on a sport to sport percentage? I can't remember what the minimum percentage is supposed to be either =(
 
Upvote 0
Athletes Less Likely to Graduate - A Myth Says Brand

Yahoo

NCAA: Athletes graduating at higher rate

By MICHAEL MAROT, AP Sports Writer1 hour, 14 minutes ago

NCAA president Myles Brand commended college athletes for their academic improvement Thursday, then criticized poor fact-checking by the media and government for failing to report the true story.
Brand said figures released by the NCAA Thursday prove athletes often outperform their peers in the classroom and called any other notion a "myth."
The latest federal graduation rates show athletes are more likely than the general student body to earn a diploma, and that female athletes continue to post higher numbers than their male counterparts.
"One of my most significant frustrations to read time and again is the mistaken myth that student-athletes are not good students," Brand said. "The federal government confirmed something we've known for a long time ? that student-athletes are good students. There really is no excuse for getting this information wrong."
The latest measurements showed incoming athletes from the freshman class of 1999-2000 held a 2-point advantage, 63 percent to 61 percent, over those students who did not play sports. Athletes also had a 1-point overall increase over last year's figures.
Federal graduation rates are calculated over a six-year period for each incoming freshman class.
Brand blamed the misperception on editorial writers and cited a letter from the House Ways and Means Committee, which is investigating the NCAA's tax-exempt status, to get the numbers right.
"Their claim that student-athletes don't perform well in the classroom is way off, and I think those wrong stories need to get their facts right," he said.
Academic reform has been Brand's top priority since taking over as president in 2003.
He presided over a movement that made eligibility standards for student-athletes more rigorous and created more stringent standards for freshmen to play. Brand also pushed for a new, more effective calculation to measure academic success among student-athletes.
Under the NCAA formula, called the Graduation Success Rate, 77 percent of student-athletes graduated. The NCAA's numbers were consistently higher than the federal rates.
The difference between the two calculations is that the federal rate does not include transfer students.
By all measures, Brand likes the progress.
"I'd say the academic achievement of our student-athletes over the last several years is one of our greatest success stories," he said.
Among the more notable findings over a four-year period were that female athletes earned diplomas at a significantly higher rate, 71 percent, than their male counterparts, 56 percent; and that blacks (53 percent) and Hispanics (58 percent) continued to lag behind other ethnicities when earning diplomas.
Whites had the highest federal score at 67 percent.
Brand also cited a 3-point increase under the federal guidelines, from 43 to 46 percent, for men's basketball players and a 4-point jump, from 38 to 42 percent, among black players.
"Four points in one year is a very serious move upward and it's 5 percent higher than African-American students in the general student body."
Four schools ? Boston College, Bucknell, Duke and Northwestern ? graduated at least 90 percent of their athletes over the one-year period. Duke, at 91 percent, had the highest rating. The other three each had 90 percent rates, but Bucknell was the only school of the top four to exceed its overall student body grad rate (88 percent).
The three lowest scores belonged to Florida A&M (19 percent), Texas-Pan American (21 percent) and Lamar (30 percent) although Lamar's total was only 1 point lower than its overall total.
The three military academies ? Army, Navy and Air Force ? received no one-year scores for their athletes. The report includes only student-athletes receiving scholarships, which the military academies don't have.

OK - if by any measure athletes graduate at a rate higher than the general student body, should the NCAA declare victory and back-off this noble crusade?
 
Upvote 0
No.

Student-athletes SHOULD graduate at a higher rate than the rest of the student body. They are involved in the unversity, so they should be retained at higher rates. They have access to better academic support services than the typical student, and often times those support services are compulsory for student-athletes while they are optional for non-athletes.

Besides, fans and coaches demand continual athletic improvement from student-athletes and athletic programs. Why should we not demand the same sort of continual improvement of student-athletes and athletic programs academically?
 
Upvote 0
Well, seeing as how those data are based on the 1996-1999 cohorts (thus, the 6 year grad rate for 1996-99 entrants), I don't really see how they expect the APR program to have made any semblance of a difference yet....

Not to mention those numbers represent Coopers "academic wonder" years, for us.
 
Upvote 0
Montana St. to lose 3 scholarships

BOZEMAN, Mont. (AP) -- Montana State's football program will lose three scholarships next season after failing to attain NCAA academic standards.
University administrators on Tuesday vowed to make improvements in academic support for athletes and in recruiting efforts, two areas cited for improvement in a report requested by President Geoff Gamble.

While the report -- written by officials from the NCAA, the Southeastern Conference and the Big Sky Conference, found many strengths in the university's current athletic procedures -- it suggested several improvements, particularly in recruiting, academic, social mentoring programs and in the graduation rate of MSU football players.
The report said the football program must "be better integrated into the athletics department and university as a whole," must involve more school personnel in recruiting and limit its reliance on transfers.

The scholarship penalty, which means the football program will operate with the equivalent of 60 instead of the 63 grants, was assessed because the Bobcats lagged behind the required standard in the NCAA's Academic Progress Rate, which monitors graduation success.
This is the second time in several years that coach Mike Kramer's program lost scholarships because of the APR deficiency.

Entire article: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/football/ncaa/02/21/bc.fbc.msuathletics.ap/index.html
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top