• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

osugrad21

Capo Regime
Staff member
DDN

1/27

Ohio State passes NCAA test

Buckeye official: None of 36 sports will lose scholarships

By Doug Harris
Dayton Daily News
COLUMBUS | Ohio State looks to have staged the equivalent of a fourth-quarter rally in meeting the criteria of the NCAA's Academic Progress Rate, but school officials believe the comeback in the classroom began long before the landmark reform kicked in.
<!--endtext-->

<!-- inset --> <!--begintext--> Put in place for the 2003-04 academic year, the APR allows the NCAA to track how Division I colleges are doing at retaining their scholarship athletes and keeping them on pace to graduate.
Low performers in the first year were warned that they would lose scholarships in 2006 if they failed again to hit the APR's cutoff of 925. And football, men's basketball and five other sports at OSU were notified that they were at risk.
But while figures for the 2004-05 school year won't be made public until late February, Dr. John Bruno, OSU's faculty athletic representative, said none of the school's 36 sports is in danger.
"There's nothing but really promising news on the APR front," he said. "You may see one or two squads below 925, but they won't be subject to ... penalties because of the confidence interval."
Bruno declined to say which teams took advantage of the confidence interval, a provision that gives programs some wiggle room until four years of data can be collected. But football and men's basketball, which had scores of 892 and 910, respectively, in the first review, had some distances to climb.
Bruno attributed the turnaround to increased accountability.
"We didn't install a boatload of programs that we didn't have already," he said. "I think we just used them more effectively.
"We intervene earlier when we see potential problems. And we appeal to the kids, not only to keep themselves eligible, but also to do the right thing by their teams."
OSU Athletic Director Gene Smith said numerous schools will be socked with penalties, and he's ecstatic that the Buckeyes won't be joining them.
"I'm really thrilled," he said. "The program is on the right trajectory.
"I think my predecessor, Andy Geiger, started us on the right track. This is not a one-year effort. We're bringing in the right kids, and we have the right support systems in place. And over the years, things have just gotten better and better and better."
The Buckeyes still lag behind their Big Ten brethren in graduation rates. Only 61 percent of their student-athletes entering school in 1998 (the most recent figures available) earned degrees in the six-year allowable window, putting them last in the conference.
The football team's 31-percent rate was third-worst in the Big Ten.
But coach Jim Tressel's squad fared better in the NCAA's newly created Graduate-Success Rate, which takes into account players leaving school while academically eligible as well as incoming transfers who graduate.
The team's GSR was 54 percent — five points higher than the national average — and Bruno expects that figure to rise.
He pointed out that 56 current players had grade-point averages of 3.0 or higher during fall quarter, and the overall team GPA was 2.81.
"When Jim took over the program (in 2001), it was several tenths lower than that," said Bruno, who is a professor of psychology and neuroscience. "If you do the math, you begin to appreciate how difficult it is to move 105 guys several tenths of a percentage point in a GPA.
"What it really reflects is a culture change. What football has managed to do is change their academic culture under Coach Tressel."
Contact Doug Harris at 225-2125.
 
DDN

1/27

Breakdown of NCAA's Academic Progress Rate formula

By Doug Harris
Dayton Daily News
COLUMBUS | What's the Academic Progress Rate?
<!--endtext-->

<!-- inset --> <!--begintext--> The APR is a formula designed by the NCAA in 2004 to measure whether colleges are keeping scholarship athletes on pace to graduate.
Teams that fall below established academic standards for two consecutive years will be penalized with the loss of scholarships in 2006 (up to 10 percent of a program's allotment). Three straight poor years will result in a postseason ban, and a fourth would put a program at risk of losing its NCAA membership.
What does the 925 figure mean?
That's the number a team must hit to avoid NCAA sanctions. Each scholarship athlete can earn two points each quarter or semester for his squad – one for staying enrolled, and a second point for remaining eligible and amassing sufficient credits to graduate within a five-year window.
A team counts its total points after one school year and divides that by the maximum number available. That tally is then multiplied by 1,000 to create the score. In short, if a team earns 92.5 percent of its possible points, it would get a score of 925. Eighty percent of points would yield a score of 800.
A program is also credited with a one-time bonus point when an athlete graduates.
Is there any wiggle room?
Yes. At least until 2008. The APR is meant to draw conclusions over four-year periods. Since assumptions based on two years of data can be skewed, especially for squads with only a few athletes, the NCAA is giving a free pass to those that come close to meeting the 925 cutoff. That cushion is called a "confidence interval." The smaller the team, the bigger the interval.
<!--endtext--><!-- // END CONTENT // --> <!--endclickprintinclude-->
 
Upvote 0
Great work by Geiger and JT to get this on the right track a few years ago.

When the official figures come out, I'll be happy that the media scrutiny will be focused elsewhere.
 
Upvote 0
That is very impressive and is great news for the program after some of the academic issues of the past few years.

It is indeed good news, and only comes from strong uniform effort across the board.

I'm glad to hear the tenor that this is a continuing focus. The frailty of the graduation rates reported say 5+ years ago made for a big mountain to climb. Keeping movement toward the top of that hill will demand constant dedication.

There will from the sound of it be much wailing and gnashing of teeth elsewhere in D-1A.
 
Upvote 0
Numerous schools with penalites...

Good news for me, as next spring when I graduate I'll be looking for a job providing academic support services for student-athletes. Looks like an applicant's market! :biggrin:
 
Upvote 0
One last tidbit - the identity of affected institutions / teams and the degree of severity of lost scholarships may not be disclosed for up to five weeks. (General formula found in second of grad21's linked articles)
 
Upvote 0
wonder if no longer being at APR risk has anything to do with a little more risk taking with this years recruiting class.

In the past it has been stated that staff was permitted to take only 2 recruits at risk of being academic casualties, and it seems like in this class we have been a bit more aggressive on this front.
 
Upvote 0
link

1/28/06

Ohio State is OK on academic progress

School won’t lose scholarships under NCAA’s formula

Saturday, January 28, 2006

Ken Gordon
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH

<!--PHOTOS--><TABLE class=phototableright align=right border=0><!-- begin large ad code --><TBODY><TR><TD><TABLE align=center><TBODY></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


Ohio State officials say none of the school’s sports will be penalized when the NCAA releases its second year of Academic Progress Rate scores in a month or so.

Faculty representative John Bruno yesterday said, "we can say factually" that no team will lose scholarships this year, the penalty for falling short of the NCAA’s mandated APR score of 925.

Neither the NCAA nor Bruno would give out OSU’s scores, which will be released either in late February or early March, according to an NCAA spokesman.

But avoiding a penalty would be a significant achievement for the football program, which had the school’s lowest APR score for the 2003-04 academic year — 892 — when the NCAA released adjusted scores last August.

To get to a 925 two-year average, logic says OSU must have scored a 958 or higher for 2004-05. But it’s not that simple.

Because the APR was designed to use a four-year average, for the first several years, the NCAA has built in a margin of error called confidence intervals. It’s a statistical cushion that allows a sport’s APR score to fall below 925 without penalties.

Although the APR formula has been adjusted once or twice in the past year, the confidence intervals have been in place from the beginning.

Last August, four OSU teams fell below 925, but three — men’s basketball (910), men’s hockey (904) and women’s gymnastics (915) carried an asterisk denoting they fell within the allowed confidence interval. Football was the exception.

This year, Bruno said, "everybody is either above 925 or protected by the confidence interval," adding that the confidence interval "is an acknowledgement that we can’t tell the difference between 900 and 925 and 914 on the basis of one year."

The NCAA gave schools one year of APR scores as a warning. After two years, programs not meeting the minimum score could lose up to 10 percent of their scholarships.

A third-year violator draws a postseason ban, and a fourth year would put the program at risk of losing NCAA membership.

"As soon as you start keeping score, disincentives will get everyone’s attention," Bruno said. "But I’ve been happy with the academic consciousness of our coaching staffs."

OSU athletics director Gene Smith said the football program’s improvement was not a result of radical changes in the past year.

"Most of it was tweaking," he said. "The program has been on a great trajectory for quite some time. Looking at different indicators, 56 young men maintained a 3.0 gradepoint average (in the fall), and (coach) Jim (Tressel) continues to try and recruit studentathletes with high academic performance.

"As an institution, we’re doing a strong job with competitive admissions. So this has been going on for some time."

kgordon@dispatch
 
Upvote 0
First round of penalties announced today:

Few big names to lose scholarships based on APR

<!-- end pagetitle --> <!-- begin bylinebox --> ESPN.com news services

<!-- begin presby2 --><!-- end presby2 -->
<!-- end bylinebox -->
<!-- begin text11 div --><!-- begin leftcol --> <!-- template inline -->Few big-name schools will lose scholarships as a result of the Academic Progress Rates report released Wednesday.
The NCAA said that 99 Division I sports teams at 65 colleges and universities -- or less than 2 percent of 6,112 Division I sports teams nationwide -- will lose scholarships for poor scholastic performance by their student-athletes.

<table id="inlinetable" align="right" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="200"> <tbody><tr><th colspan="2" style="background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Men's Basketball</th> </tr><tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td colspan="2"> Schools which will lose scholarships for poor scholastic performance under the terms of the Academic Progress Rates reform program: </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> School </td> <td> No. </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Cal Poly </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Centenary </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> East Carolina </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Hampton </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Jacksonville </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Kent State </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> New Mexico St. </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> S. Carolina St. </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Texas State </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Mary.-Eastern Shore </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> DePaul </td> <td> 1 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Florida A&M </td> <td> 1 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Louisiana Tech </td> <td> 1 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Prairie View </td> <td> 1 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> La.-Lafayette </td> <td> 1 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> La.-Monroe </td> <td> 1 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Sacramento State </td> <td> 1 </td> </tr> </tbody></table> In Division I-A football, Temple (9), New Mexico State (6), Toledo (6) Hawaii (5), Middle Tennessee (5), Western Michigan (5) Buffalo (3) and Northern Illinois (2) were penalized.

"You've got to bring in kids that not only want to make it to the NFL, but also want to graduate and get their degree," first-year Middle Tennessee coach Rick Stockstill told ESPN. "If a kid just wants to graduate and not make it to the NFL, I'm not interested. If he wants the NFL and not the degree, I'm not interested. You have to do a good job in evaluating. We're getting out of the Prop 48 business."

In Division I basketball, Cal-Poly (2), Centenary (2), East Carolina (2), Hampton (2), Jacksonville (2), Kent State (2), Maryland Eastern Shore (2), New Mexico State (2), South Carolina State (2), Texas State (2), Sacramento State (1), DePaul (1), Florida A&M (1), Lousiana Lafayette (1), Louisiana-Monroe (1), Louisiana Tech (1) and Prarie View (1) were penalized.

First-year New Mexico State coach Reggie Theus told ESPN.com that it wasn't fair that a new coach gets penalized for past transgressions. The Aggies will lose two scholarships, a decision Theus said NMSU appealed to no avail. He will have to take off the scholarships from his maximum 13 for next season.

"There's got to be some sort of grace period to see if there is improvement [for new coaches] before you get hit with a penalty," Theus said Wednesday. "We've got a new AD, a new president, new programs that we've implemented and you would think we could get at least one of those penalties rescinded. But we didn't.

"We'll survive it," Theus said. "But for new coaches it puts you behind the eight ball."
One of the programs hit hardest was Florida A&M, which loses scholarships in baseball (1.07), football (8), men's basketball (1), men's swimming (0.99) and women's swimming (1.23).

The NCAA said that the loss of eight football scholarships will be separate and in addition to penalties previously leveled against Florida A&M. Charged with a lack of institutional control, Florida A&M was put on probation for four years with a loss of 30 scholarships, including 14 over the next four seasons.

Of the 99 sports teams that will lose scholarships, 90 are men's teams and 9 are women's teams. The majority are in three sports: football (23), baseball (21), and men's basketball (17).

As many as 350 Division I sports teams were in danger of penalties at this time last year. "We are encouraged by the response on many campuses to academic reform," said NCAA president Myles Brand. "The goal of academic reform is to improve academic behaviors and increase graduation, not unnecessarily penalize teams."
More serious consequences, which could include limits on postseason competition and restricted membership status, await teams that continue to academically under perform.

<table id="inlinetable" align="right" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="200"> <tbody><tr><th colspan="2" style="background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Football</th> </tr><tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td colspan="2"> Schools (Division I-A) which will lose scholarships for poor scholastic performance under the terms of the Academic Progress Rates reform program: </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> School </td> <td> No. </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Temple </td> <td> 9 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Toledo </td> <td> 6 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Hawaii </td> <td> 5 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Middle Tenn. St. </td> <td> 5 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Western Michigan </td> <td> 5 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Buffalo </td> <td> 3 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> New Mexico St. </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: rgb(236, 236, 236);" valign="top"> <td> Northern Illinois </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> </tbody></table> "The APR has become part of the athletics language; schools are incorporating the APR into their strategic plans and programming, and they are using it to hold coaches and other personnel accountable for student-athlete academic achievement," Brand said. "Significant attention is being paid to meeting the new standards, and I expect the next few years of APR data to reflect that focus."

For a team to lose a scholarship under the "contemporaneous penalty" portion of academic reform, a student-athlete must have failed academically and left the institution; and the team's APR must be below 925 (out of 1000).

The APR is calculated by measuring the academic eligibility and retention of student-athletes by team each term. Based on current data, an APR of 925 calculates to an approximate Graduation Success Rate of 60 percent.

Teams can lose up to 10 percent of scholarships each year allowed by NCAA rules. When a penalty is applied, a college or university may not re-award the scholarship of an ineligible student-athlete who left school to another student-athlete for one year.

Eight institutions have not yet completed the process for determining penalties under APR: Arizona State University; Northern Arizona University; San Diego State University; San Jose State University; Texas A&M University, College Station; University of Arizona; University of Kansas; and Tulane University.

Information from ESPN's Joe Schad and Andy Katz was used in this report
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top