MililaniBuckeye;1114490; said:
I'd rather lose 50% of my $10M salary than 50% of my 100K salary...it's a lot easier to get by on $5M than it is on $50K. I just can't follow how you think having more money is harder then having less money. If I had $10M, I would have zero problems managing it, because I would only use what I need (like I do now), and with all that money in reserve, I'd never have problems.
You're equating having more money (a simple numerical sum in a bank account) with actually having more physical, tangible resources, like automobiles or property. Yeah, if I had 20 cars instead of one, or 10 houses instead of one, it would be more difficult to manage. But having $10,000,000 would be no more of a problem than would be having $100,000. It's a single amount of money.
I am not equating having more money with having more tangible resources, I am saying that taking care of more money is a lot harder than taking care of a little money.
I also am not discounting that while you have the big bucks that other things in life won't be easier. (putting food on the table, not bouncing checks, etc...)
"If I had 10M I would have zero problems managing it."
Interesting lots of people say this and end up broke quickly. Its not just limited to NBA players, but lottery winners, etc...
There is a reason Lawrence Funderburke wrote his book Hook Me Up Player.
I don't know you personally, and maybe you wouldn't fritter the money away, but I do know that people in general spend more as they make more. And they have trouble putting the breaks on their spending as their resources dwindle. I bet that your spending habits changed greatly when you left school and started making more. (I don't know this for sure, but I think its a safe bet) That is you started dining out instead scraping up coupons for pizza or eating Ramen every week.
You cite a 100k salary figure. I know(read work with) a lot of people who think that if they just made 100k per year, they would be set for life. Yet as you probably know, this isn't necessarily the case. (note I make no assumptions that 100k is what you make, I am just using the cite to continue a point)
Look, I agree with you on your central point. Its the players own short sightedness or lack of financial acumen that makes it easy for them to go broke. They should not be pitied, etc... But this statistic seems realistic.