• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Big Ten and other Conference Expansion

Which Teams Should the Big Ten Add? (please limit to four selections)

  • Boston College

    Votes: 32 10.2%
  • Cincinnati

    Votes: 19 6.1%
  • Connecticut

    Votes: 6 1.9%
  • Duke

    Votes: 21 6.7%
  • Georgia Tech

    Votes: 55 17.6%
  • Kansas

    Votes: 46 14.7%
  • Maryland

    Votes: 67 21.4%
  • Missouri

    Votes: 90 28.8%
  • North Carolina

    Votes: 39 12.5%
  • Notre Dame

    Votes: 209 66.8%
  • Oklahoma

    Votes: 78 24.9%
  • Pittsburgh

    Votes: 45 14.4%
  • Rutgers

    Votes: 40 12.8%
  • Syracuse

    Votes: 18 5.8%
  • Texas

    Votes: 121 38.7%
  • Vanderbilt

    Votes: 15 4.8%
  • Virginia

    Votes: 47 15.0%
  • Virginia Tech

    Votes: 62 19.8%
  • Stay at 12 teams and don't expand

    Votes: 27 8.6%
  • Add some other school(s) not listed

    Votes: 25 8.0%

  • Total voters
    313
LovelandBuckeye;2157880; said:
But what about Cincinnati?

Barring divine intervention, I think we are headed for a Big East/ACC leftovers conference. It will have good basketball and mediocre football. Hopefully, we'll regain some geographic sanity in the process. Syracuse and Pitt could essentially end up back in the Big East because those two will probably be left behind in the ACC after the B1G, SEC and B12 take the best football schools.
 
Upvote 0
LovelandBuckeye;2158028; said:
The good thing with UVa is they will be even cooler than 5 popped collar cool.

1210396234345.jpg

Um doesn't that belong in the Shane Morris thread?
 
Upvote 0

Do you really want to have an B1G (East Division) of

Ohio State

Michigan
Michigan State
Penn State
Maryland
UNC
UVa
BC

Get the idea of divisions out of your head cause 8 team divisions wont work. We will probably see 4 pods of 4 teams. Take the top two pod champs and there is ypur championship game. You play the three in your pod, a protected crossover and then a team from each pod on a rotating basis. Therefore it eould be a max 4 years between conf matchups.

this system would work perfect here:
East: UNC, UVA, Duke, MD/GT
Mid-East: PSU, tOSU, IU, PU
Midwest: UM, MSU, UI, NW
West: UW, Minn, Iowa, Neb

These would work perfectly. Keep many rivalries together, provide fans at least one very managable roadtrip, plus the opportunoty for a lot of FANTASTIC champ hames are onthe table
 
Upvote 0
rampageripster;2158050; said:
East: UNC, UVA, Duke, MD/GT
Mid-East: PSU, tOSU, IU, PU
Midwest: UM, MSU, UI, NW
West: UW, Minn, Iowa, Neb

I would made one small change. I would love to drop Duke and add GT... but to get UNC and UVA I'd take Duke.

East: UNC, UVA, MD, GT
Mid-East: PSU, tOSU, IU, PU
Midwest: UM, MSU, UI, NW
West: UW, Minn, Iowa, Neb
 
Upvote 0
WaitingforKickoff;1718466; said:
If you think about it, the easiest way to implement a playoff system is to have two mega conferences, each composed of two divisions, with the conference title games essentially becoming the semi-finals and the title game matching up the champs of the two conferences. Sorta like the NL and the AL.

Conference expansions and implosions aren't the ultimate end-game here. If teams decide to take the catalytic steps to join conferences that aren't in their traditional sphere of audience, and conferences like the B12 and the ACC start disappearing, a two mega-division scenario might be the only way where all the traditional BCS teams have a fair shot at playing for the title game. The SEC pretty much has one spot locked up in the BCS title game, and if you add Neb, ND and Texas to the B10, well, you can do the math.

Hate to quote myself from a couple of years ago, but it looks like I was right again on conference expansions leading to a playoff format. :biggrin:
 
Upvote 0
OSU_D/;2158056; said:
I would made one small change. I would love to drop Duke and add GT... but to get UNC and UVA I'd take Duke.

I like GT a lot but Duke brings a national cache in BB that trumps anything tech brings to the table. Academics is a wash. Duke has 5 top 10 Directors Cup finishes - GT has none. I hate Duke but there's much more there when you bring them in with UNC.
 
Upvote 0
rampageripster;2158022; said:
Pretty much... if we added those four unc/uva/gt would ne tops every year woth neb right behind them... would also open up the possibility of a B1G lax leagues men: tOSU, UM, PSU, UNC, UVA, Duke (MD?) would be formidable... as would womens (subtract UM add powerhouse NW)... we might not win tennis every year anymore either


Rampaging on the English language - I like it.
 
Upvote 0
rampageripster;2158050; said:
Get the idea of divisions out of your head cause 8 team divisions wont work. We will probably see 4 pods of 4 teams. Take the top two pod champs and there is ypur championship game. You play the three in your pod, a protected crossover and then a team from each pod on a rotating basis. Therefore it eould be a max 4 years between conf matchups.

this system would work perfect here:
East: UNC, UVA, Duke, MD/GT
Mid-East: PSU, tOSU, IU, PU
Midwest: UM, MSU, UI, NW
West: UW, Minn, Iowa, Neb

These would work perfectly. Keep many rivalries together, provide fans at least one very managable roadtrip, plus the opportunoty for a lot of FANTASTIC champ hames are onthe table



Pods would blow. Why the fuck would you want to be in a 16-team conference yet play Indiana or Northwestern every fucking year? In a four year span, players should get the opportunity to visit as many opponent stadiums as possible.
 
Upvote 0
sammyjenkis;2158082; said:
Pods would blow. Why the [censored] would you want to be in a 16-team conference yet play Indiana or Northwestern every [censored]ing year? In a four year span, players should get the opportunity to visit as many opponent stadiums as possible.

What's the complaint here again? If you do divisions, then you are still playing same teams every year.

Only solution to the problem you stated would be to have non-permanent divisions, which, in my IMO would be just plain dumb.
 
Upvote 0
Uh, what's wrong with two 8-team divisions if we expand to 16 teams? Up until this past eason we've been playing in one big 11-team division, aka the Big Ten Conference. 4-team pods would be stupid.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top