• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Fox news tape with Clarke

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
LightningRod said:
If I agree with it, it's a good thing. If I don't agree with it, it's divisive. OK, I'll buy that.
Click to expand...

No, not what I said. I said that divisiveness is not a trait exclusive to Rush Limbaugh.

Maybe Rush is divisive. Guess what? I don't give a rip. Like I said above, if having a firm idealogy and sticking to it, and opposing those who disagree with you is "divisive", then I don't have a problem with divisiveness.
 
Upvote 0
Nixon said:
No, not what I said. I said that divisiveness is not a trait exclusive to Rush Limbaugh.

Maybe Rush is divisive. Guess what? I don't give a rip. Like I said above, if having a firm idealogy and sticking to it, and opposing those who disagree with you is "divisive", then I don't have a problem with divisiveness.
Click to expand...

I definitely agree with you here.
 
Upvote 0
Ok, lets say either Clinton or Bush gets a memo dropped in their lap from the CIA. It says a terrorist could use a plane as a way to cause mass destruction.
If either one proceeded to take all the necessary steps at the airports, a very large expenditure would be needed to cover the costs. I guarantee whichever side wanted to spend the money, the opposite party would be all over it and raise all kinds of fuss. Dems and Repubs. would both do it.

I really can't lay too much blame on either administration in this case.

Just my .02

:osu:
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top