• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Game Thread Game Ten: Ohio State 48, Northwestern 7 (final)

Ahhhh...Wow a couple weeks ago this game looked alot differently than it does right now..If you would have told me a couple weeks ago that we would be favored by 16 over NW id laugh..

Pittman runs for 168, scores 2 td's..

Smith throws for 397, throws for 4 td's..

Ginn runs back a punt..

Our D gets 11 sacks and holds them under 250..And under 20 points..

Im smellin a 45-16 kinda game...
 
Upvote 0
Ahhhh...Wow a couple weeks ago this game looked alot differently than it does right now..If you would have told me a couple weeks ago that we would be favored by 16 over NW id laugh..

Pittman runs for 168, scores 2 td's..

Smith throws for 397, throws for 4 td's..

Ginn runs back a punt..

Our D gets 11 sacks and holds them under 250..And under 20 points..

Im smellin a 45-16 kinda game...

Hmmmm.... Pitt with 2 TDs, plus 4 for Smith makes 6... that's 42... If Ginn runs back a punt, I bet they score more than 45. :p
 
Upvote 0
Wow, someone didn't like my last post...do people really think we're going to shut out NW? I wasn't ragging on our D at all, I just don't think they will get zero points like Illinois did.
 
Upvote 0
Our D gets 11 sacks and holds them under 250..And under 20 points..

It's hard to sack a team like northwestern that throws quick passes out of the spread like they do 11 times. It's a nice thought and im sure we will get some pressure on him, but i think it will be tough to get that many. But hey, we got 12 on michigan state so who knows.

GO BUCKS!
GO SENIORS!


The Mongoose
 
Upvote 0
"Moving the ball" is not scoring, and I actually disagree quite a bit that spread teams in any way shape or form have their way with OSU.

I didn't say, "spread teams have their way with the Buckeye Defense... in any way shape or form... Michigan State moved the ball on us from the spread... Illinois had moments with the spread , making 15 first downs despite all the sacks and tackles for loss.
 
Upvote 0
I didn't say, "spread teams have their way with the Buckeye Defense... in any way shape or form... Michigan State moved the ball on us from the spread... Illinois had moments with the spread , making 15 first downs despite all the sacks and tackles for loss.

160 total yards? Yeah, they had their moments....

Total 1st Downs 9
Rushing: 68 at 2.1 per carry
Passing: 92 5.1 per completion

Look at all the Spread played v. OSU since Texas TEch 2002. Then, get back to me on how successful it's been.
 
Upvote 0
160 total yards? Yeah, they had their moments....

Total 1st Downs 9
Rushing: 68 at 2.1 per carry
Passing: 92 5.1 per completion

Look at all the Spread played v. OSU since Texas TEch 2002. Then, get back to me on how successful it's been.
Whew. Did I say something disparaging about your mother?

But since we're talking about the spread, I never said teams were able to beat us with the spread. I said they've been able to move the ball... never said move the ball consistently... but yeah Northwestern beat us with the spread, Phil Rivers ran up some impressive totals and Michigan State ran all over the field in the first half and part of the second. I'm also saying that Illinois moved the ball. Penalties and sacks cost them and the sacks certainly changed how the stats on their running look.

I'm not looking for a fight, I just think that Northwestern can be a troublesome lot and that the reason I believe that they might be difficult is that they play a very good spread. OK?
 
Upvote 0
To me, this clearly looks like a game where you take OSU and the points. The point spread is pretty good, but I think that OSU wins by 20. Walker is the kind of weasel who tries to make the final score look better than it is (just like Leach did back in 2002), so I think that NU's starters will tack on some late points once the game is out of reach.

Don't shoot the messenger or anything, but I'll pick 41-21. :)

Nothing I'd love more than a shutout, but we've had a pattern for four seasons of putting the second and third team defenses early in runaway games. With scUM coming up next, there's no way the staff is going to risk getting the D starters hurt in garbage time.
 
Upvote 0
Whew. Did I say something disparaging about your mother?

But since we're talking about the spread, I never said teams were able to beat us with the spread. I said they've been able to move the ball... never said move the ball consistently... but yeah Northwestern beat us with the spread, Phil Rivers ran up some impressive totals and Michigan State ran all over the field in the first half and part of the second. I'm also saying that Illinois moved the ball. Penalties and sacks cost them and the sacks certainly changed how the stats on their running look.

I'm not looking for a fight, I just think that Northwestern can be a troublesome lot and that the reason I believe that they might be difficult is that they play a very good spread. OK?

Woa, dude. Didn't mean to come off as though I wanted to vscrap with ya, I was simply showing why I don' t agree with what you said.
 
Upvote 0
To me, this clearly looks like a game where you take OSU and the points. The point spread is pretty good, but I think that OSU wins by 20. Walker is the kind of weasel who tries to make the final score look better than it is (just like Leach did back in 2002), so I think that NU's starters will tack on some late points once the game is out of reach.

Did anyone else noticed that we kept the defensive starters in late against Illinois? I think the same thing will happen with Northwestern, no matter how far we're ahead. Tressel wants to get any remaining kinks out before The Game.
 
Upvote 0
bn (free)

11/7/05


<TABLE cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=0 width="98%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=3>Game Data: Northwestern at Ohio State

</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top bgColor=#ffffff>
251799.jpg

Brett Basanez

</TD><TD noWrap width=3></TD><TD vAlign=top>By Steve Helwagen
Managing Editor
Date: Nov 7, 2005

We have pertinent information, depth charts and a prediction on Saturday's home finale against Northwestern (noon, ABC).
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=3>
Game Data: Northwestern at Ohio State
* Date, Time: Sat., Nov. 12, noon (Eastern)
* Location: Ohio Stadium
* TV: ABC (regional, coverage map is not out but it appears NU-OSU is the only game at noon, it could go to the Eastern two-thirds of the U.S. with a late Pac-10 game going instead to the West Coast; announcers, Brent Musberger, Gary Danielson, Jack Arute).
* 2005 Records, Rankings: Ohio State, 7-2 overall, 5-1 Big Ten, ranked 10th in Associated Press poll and USA Today coaches poll; Northwestern, 6-2 overall, 4-2 Big Ten, ranked 25th in AP poll.
* Coaches: Ohio State, Jim Tressel (fifth year at OSU, 47-13; 20th year overall, 182-70-2; vs. Northwestern, 3-1); Northwestern, Randy Walker (seventh year at Northwestern, 36-43; 16th year overall, 95-78-5; vs. OSU, 1-3).
* Series History: Ohio State leads the all-time series 55-14-1, including 30-8-0 in Columbus. Last year, Northwestern upset OSU 33-27 in overtime in Evanston. The win snapped OSU’s 24-game winning streak in the series dating to a 1971 loss (14-10) in Columbus. OSU had also won 14 straight games in Evanston, dating to a 1958 loss (10-0). OSU has won the last 12 meetings in Columbus, including 20-0 in 2003.
* Northwestern Schedule: Sept. 3, Ohio U., W 38-14; Sept. 10, Northern Illinois, W 38-37; Sept. 17, at Arizona State, L 52-21; Sept. 24, Penn State, L 34-29; Oct. 8, Wisconsin, W 51-48; Oct. 15, at Purdue, W 34-29; Oct. 22, at Michigan State, W 49-14; Oct. 29, Michigan, L 33-17; Nov. 5, Iowa, W 28-27; Nov. 12, at Ohio State; Nov. 19, at Illinois.
* Northwestern Key Players (2005 Stats): QB Brett Basanez (236 of 365 passing, 2,845 yards, 16 TDs, 5 INTs; 85 carries, 320 yards, 5 TDs), RB Tyrell Sutton (184 carries, 1,085 yards, 16 TDs), WR Shaun Herbert (66 catches, 744 yards, 5 TDs), WR Jonathan Fields (46 catches, 402 yards), WR Mark Philmore (39 catches, 526 yards, 4 TDs), MLB Tim McGarigle (122 tackles, 6-1/2 TFLs), WLB Nick Roach (57 tackles, 3-1/2 TFLs), CB Marquice Cole (40 tackles, 4 INTs), FS Herschel Henderson (50 tackles, 3 INTs).
* Northwestern Fast Facts: Location: Evanston, Ill.; Enrollment, 7,800; Nickname, Wildcats; Colors, Purple and White; Stadium, Ryan Field (surface, grass; capacity, 47,130).
Depth Charts
Ohio State Offense

SE 4 Santonio Holmes, 5-11, 190, Jr.
8 Roy Hall, 6-3, 240, Jr.
LT 50 Doug Datish, 6-5, 295, Jr.
75 Alex Boone, 6-8, 315, Fr.
LG 77 Rob Sims, 6-4, 310, Sr.
59 John Conroy, 6-3, 295, Sr.
C 55 Nick Mangold, 6-4, 290, Sr.
50 Doug Datish, 6-5, 295, Jr.
RG 72 T.J. Downing, 6-5, 305, Jr.
59 John Conroy, 6-3, 295, Sr.
RT 75 Alex Boone, 6-8, 315, Fr.
or 74 Kirk Barton, 6-7, 325, So.
TE 81 Marcel Frost, 6-5, 255, So.
87 Brandon Smith, 6-3, 240, R-Fr.
FL 7 Ted Ginn Jr., 6-0, 175, So.
5 Albert Dukes, 6-1, 190, R-Fr.
QB 10 Troy Smith, 6-1, 215, Jr.
12 Justin Zwick, 6-4, 225, Jr.
TB 25 Antonio Pittman, 5-11, 195, So.
34 Maurice Wells, 5-10, 185, Fr.
FB 89 Stan White Jr., 6-3, 242, Jr.
49 Dionte Johnson, 6-0, 250, So.
SL 11 Anthony Gonzalez, 6-0, 195, So.
85 Brian Robiskie, 6-3, 190, Fr.
K 23 Josh Huston, 6-1, 195, Sr.
85 Ryan Pretorius, 5-10, 190, R-Fr.
Ohio State Defense

DE 97 David Patterson, 6-3, 285, Jr.
99 Jay Richardson, 6-6, 276, Jr.
DT 94 Marcus Green, 6-3, 290, Sr.
97 David Patterson, 6-3, 285, Jr.
DT 90 Quinn Pitcock, 6-3, 295, Jr.
98 Joel Penton, 6-5, 290, Jr.
DE 57 Mike Kudla, 6-3, 265, Sr.
50 Vernon Gholston, 6-4, 260, So.
SLB 42 Bobby Carpenter, 6-3, 255, Sr.
33 James Laurinaitis, 6-3, 231, Fr.
MLB 51 Anthony Schlegel, 6-1, 251, Sr.
5 Mike D’Andrea, 6-3, 248, Jr.
WLB 47 A.J. Hawk, 6-1, 240, Sr.
52 John Kerr, 6-1, 246, Jr.
CB 26 Ashton Youboty, 6-1, 188, Jr.
2 Malcolm Jenkins, 6-1, 180, Fr.
FS 21 Nate Salley, 6-3, 220, Sr.
32 Brandon Mitchell, 6-3, 205, Jr.
SS 9 Donte Whitner, 5-11, 205, Jr.
3 Jamario O’Neal, 6-1, 180, Fr.
CB 2 Malcolm Jenkins, 6-1, 180, Fr.
or 6 Tyler Everett, 5-11, 202, Sr.
NB 32 Brandon Mitchell, 6-3, 205, Jr.
34 Rob Harley, 6-2, 202, Sr.
P 15 A.J. Trapasso, 6-1, 220, R-Fr.
LS 68 Drew Norman, 6-0, 230, Jr.
Northwestern Offense

WR 3 Shaun Herbert, 6-1, 200, Jr.
1 Jonathan Fields, 5-8, 175, Sr.
TE 44 Erryn Cobb, 6-1, 255, Jr.
83 Sean Mansfield, 6-3, 245, Sr.
LT 74 Dylan Thiry, 6-8, 300, So.
78 Kurt Mattes, 6-6, 280, Fr.
LG 51 Joe Tripodi, 6-3, 300, Jr.
59 Alex Rucks, 6-4, 300, R-Fr.
C 62 Austin Matthews, 6-5, 285, So.
52 Joel Belding, 6-3, 300, R-Fr.
RG 56 Ryan Keenan, 6-4, 290, Jr.
77 Adam Crum, 6-1, 280, So.
RT 63 Zach Strief, 6-7, 335, Sr.
78 Kurt Mattes, 6-6, 280, Fr.
QB 14 Brett Basanez, 6-2, 215, Sr.
18 C.J. Bacher, 6-2, 190, R-Fr.
TB 19 Tyrell Sutton, 5-9, 190, Fr.
11 Brandon Roberson, 5-9, 195, So.
FB 49 Frayne Abernathy, 6-3, 245, So.
2 Chris Malleo, 6-3, 220, So.
WR 84 Kim Thompson, 6-4, 195, So.
89 Ross Lane, 6-3, 180, R-Fr.
WR 9 Mark Philmore, 5-10, 185, Sr.
8 Rasheed Ward, 5-10, 170, Fr.
K 93 Joel Howells, 6-4, 220, Jr.
Northwestern Defense

DE 95 Kevin Mims, 6-3, 270, R-Fr.
91 Mark Koehn, 6-3, 260, So.
DT 67 Barry Cofield, 6-4, 305, Sr.
92 Keegan Kennedy, 6-3, 250, Fr.
DT 53 Trevor Schultz, 6-2, 295, Jr.
70 John Gill, 6-3, 285, Fr.
DE 91 Mark Koehn, 6-3, 260, So.
72 David Ngene, 6-3, 275, So.
WLB 38 Nick Roach, 6-2, 245, Jr.
or 40 Eddie Simpson, 6-0, 225, So.
MLB 41 Tim McGarigle, 6-1, 235, Sr.
42 Demetrius Eaton, 6-2, 235, Jr.
SLB 43 Adam Kadela, 6-2, 240, So.
37 Campbell Black, 6-3, 225, Jr.
CB 20 Marquice Cole, 5-9, 185, Jr.
6 Cory Dious, 5-9, 165, Jr.
SS 25 Frederic Tarver, 6-2, 215, Sr.
27 Reggie McPherson, 6-1, 190, So.
FS 24 Herschel Henderson, 6-3, 195, Sr.
27 Reggie McPherson, 6-1, 190, So.
CB 22 Deante Battle, 5-10, 180, So.
6 Cory Dious, 5-9, 165, Jr.
P 15 Slade Larscheid, 6-1, 205, Jr. Breaking It Down
* When Ohio State Has The Ball: The Ohio State offense has enjoyed three straight 40-point games in the wins over Indiana, Minnesota and Illinois. I think you can safely make it four in a row with this week’s game with Northwestern, which is 117th nationally in total defense (494.4 yards per game) and 99th in scoring (32.0 points per game).
Northwestern is almost the anti-Ohio State: Where the Buckeyes are built on great defense and special teams and adequate offense, the Wildcats are great offense and so-so defense and special teams.
My feeling is Antonio Pittman will again push past the 100-yard barrier on the ground and I think that Troy Smith may finally hit the 300-yard mark in passing. NU linebacker Tim McGarigle, defensive tackle Barry Cofield and free safety Herschel Henderson make the Wildcats strong up the middle. But I’m not sure NU is quite as strong on the perimeter. I’d look for Santonio Holmes and Ted Ginn Jr. to try and exploit those open areas early and often.
* When Northwestern Has The Ball: NU has been able to win so much because their offense, led by four-year starting quarterback Brett Basanez, had been able to outscore their defense. The Wildcats never give up and they have won four games by five points or less, including last week’s come-from-behind 28-27 win over Iowa.
Basanez is a true student of the game and he has a decent offensive line and a fleet of receivers to throw to. Plus, freshman tailback Tyrell Sutton – all 5-9 and 190 pounds of him – may not have been good enough for Ohio State. But he’s already a 1,000-yard rusher for Northwestern. He has truly been a godsend.
This will be a great match-up of OSU’s defense (ranked seventh nationally at 280.2 yards per game) against NU’s offense (amazingly also seventh nationally at 508.1 ypg). My feeling is the Wildcats will move the ball between the 20s. But, as OSU was able to do at critical junctures against Minnesota, I imagine the Buckeyes will slam the door in the red zone.
* How It Will Go: Ohio State can ill afford another slow start on offense. If the Buckeyes go three-and-out or have to settle for early field goals instead of touchdowns, they could be looking at an early deficit. But, again, the OSU defense should have what it takes to contain Northwestern and keep the scoring down to a reasonable level.
With this being the final home game for 16 OSU seniors and a shot at the Big Ten championship at stake, I don’t think emotion or inspiration will be lacking. The Buckeyes will need to play great assignment football – especially on defense – to win this game. This is a team that scored 29 points on Penn State, 51 on Wisconsin, 49 on Michigan State and 28 on Iowa.
On the other side, I think Smith may be ready for another career day. If he and Ginn and Holmes can keep their magic going, OSU can win this game comfortably and give their seniors a true send-off. I’ve got it: Ohio State 44-21
* For The Record: I am 7-2 straight-up and 5-4 against-the-spread with Ohio State. (As of Monday, OSU was listed as a 15-point favorite.)
On this week’s Bucknuts Radio Hour, Jerry Rudzinski predicted OSU 41-28, Kirk Larrabee said OSU 34-17 and Mr. Bucknuts went OSU 33-17. Roy Lamberton, editor of PurpleReign.com (northwestern.scout.com), picked Northwestern 33-30.
-- Steve Helwagen
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Upvote 0
I love the NW students. I envision EyeCat running the BCS in the near future. EyeCat's Analysis:

EyeCat
user profile
Post #248
O,K,...Here goes the analysis...but you wont like it! Reply
For the last two weeks, against Michigan and Iowa, I did a defensive statistical analysis that predicted the final yards and points within a few fractions of a percent.

I have once again updated all of the data for both OSU and NU and the analysis is not pretty...

> NU on defense (while not nearly as bad as the stats suggest) gives up an average of 14% extra yards and 1.2% extra points than each teams given average over 10 games.

> OSU on defense packs an impressive shut down punch, resulting in a 30.1% reduction in yards allowed compared to each teams respective average over 10 games and a whalloping 54% reduction in average scoring!

Putting those numbers to each teams respective offensive production to date results in the following score:

> NU 18 points and 355 total yards
> OSU 32 points and 460 total yards

Can someone help?
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top