• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Houston Rockets (2x NBA Champions)

this is still going on?

JORDAN.JPG
23jordan_06.jpg

case closed.
 
Upvote 0
bb73: "Sloop, I just don't enjoy the back-and-forth debate, as I believe you do. So I won't put forth any more of my opinions for you to respond to."

Not at all. You can post whatever you want. Just because we disagree doesn't mean it has to be a pissing match. Its good conversation, I don't take it personal at all.

"But I must point out the situation in your own 6th-man comments. You devalue the recent awards that have been going to players that aren't scoring near 20 points per game, but give great credit to Walton in '86 for winning the award when he averaged 7.6. Seems like you want to have it both ways"

Yeah, but here's the difference: although Sixth Men come off the bench, most of 'em are still around 38-40 minutes a game. Walton was at 19 mpg when he won the Award, and if you project his numbers out to approximately 40 min a game, he'd be at 15 ppg, 13 rpg, 4 apg, & 2 bpg. That's huge. And plus, Walton was never a guy with a high scoring average. I think in his MVP year he was at approximately 18 to 19 a game.
 
Upvote 0
rockets

living in ohio and houston for 14 years im a fan of any team from the area, and im a big fan of the rockets, hakeem, clyde the glide, kenny smith, robert horry, and sam cassell, on that team i think is a remarkable team and it is an insult to the city of houston to even suggest that the series' never happened... not only do i think the rockets wouldve beat them at least once i think they wouldve won both times and they wouldve kicked the shit out of mj and pippen cause they had depth, and the bulls just had a two man show
 
Upvote 0
Chronological series of events:

The Bulls kick everyone's ass----Jordan retires---The rockets win some championships---Jordan comes back---The Bulls kick everyone's ass again---Jordan retires.

Do you seriously think that Jordan retiring and coming back coincided with the rockets winning those titles purely by chance? I think that's a text book case of cause and effect.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27 said:
Chronological series of events:

The Bulls kick everyone's ass----Jordan retires---The rockets win some championships---Jordan comes back---The Bulls kick everyone's ass again---Jordan retires.

Do you seriously think that Jordan retiring and coming back coincided with the rockets winning those titles purely by chance? I think that's a text book case of cause and effect.

you make a very good case, but the 2nd year the rockets won the championship, mj returned to the bulls for the last 2 months and they made the playoffs, but they didnt win the championship? theres so many things i guess you could say on both sides but the fact that they were in the playoffs with mj when the rockets won the ship for the 2nd consecutive year
 
Upvote 0
MJ wasn't in basketball shape until the following year. When they won 72 games (and apparently lost 2 to the Rockets). The Bulls won 6 championships in a row....the NBA was on strike for 2 years in the 90s.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27 said:
The Bulls won 6 championships in a row....the NBA was on strike for 2 years in the 90s.
The biggest problem I see with this type of thinking is that history, statistics, memory, record books, and reality indicate this is wrong. Other than that, you have a great argument. :roll2:

Of course, as I've said before, too bad Jordan had to retire in order to avoid getting in trouble with his gambling debts. If it wasn't his own mistakes, this whole argument would be a moot point and settled by history.
 
Upvote 0
buckeyegrad said:
The biggest problem I see with this type of thinking is that history, statistics, memory, record books, and reality indicate this is wrong. Other than that, you have a great argument. :roll2:

Of course, as I've said before, too bad Jordan had to retire in order to avoid getting in trouble with his gambling debts. If it wasn't his own mistakes, this whole argument would be a moot point and settled by history.
I'm pretty sure that 27 made it clear early in this thread that he is enormously biased towards Da Bulls. The fact that anyone is still arguing about this is just more ammo for him to stir it up.

So, I don't read all those books and stuff about sports and stuff. Why, exactly, did Jordan have to make his departure?
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top