Huh. Maybe I worded poorly, or maybe you misread, doesn't matter. I'm not at all trying to send you to Bucknuts, you're more than welcome to keep posting here. You mentioned elsewhere you hadn't been there before, I gave the link suggesting that there were more like conversations going on there. That quite a few take it too far, but there are still a ton of great posters over there. Sending you to Bucknuts (even if I was), shouldn't be considered a bad thing. Anyway, I'm not trying to be rid of you.
I also don't mean to sound defensive. You made a point, I saw it differently. We both made our points, and that's it. You (and anyone else) can be critical of Craig, I am at times myself of course. Just because in this case I thought he actually played well, doesn't mean I'm a groupie of his or something. And saying that shouldn't be read as me saying I don't like him as our starting QB, I do. I just don't feel a personal bias one way or another.
So again, not trying at all to be combative or defensive. Just sharing my perspective on the issue for whatever it's worth. The only thing I didn't really understand was the "stats are for losers" thing, and I said as much. The rest -- well I thought I was pretty clear on the whole 'happy to agree to disagree' deal.
Don't take anything too personally, we have no real beef.
--edit--
I understand your Thome example. My point earlier is in contrast of that though. Krenzel's good numbers came (I felt and feel) when we did need them. When we were down in the early going and absolutely had to score, he was nearly perfect for a couple critical drives. Doesn't mean he didn't struggle in the first few series badly, and then again later at the end of the game, but he had some moments there.
I also don't mean to sound defensive. You made a point, I saw it differently. We both made our points, and that's it. You (and anyone else) can be critical of Craig, I am at times myself of course. Just because in this case I thought he actually played well, doesn't mean I'm a groupie of his or something. And saying that shouldn't be read as me saying I don't like him as our starting QB, I do. I just don't feel a personal bias one way or another.
So again, not trying at all to be combative or defensive. Just sharing my perspective on the issue for whatever it's worth. The only thing I didn't really understand was the "stats are for losers" thing, and I said as much. The rest -- well I thought I was pretty clear on the whole 'happy to agree to disagree' deal.
Don't take anything too personally, we have no real beef.
--edit--
I understand your Thome example. My point earlier is in contrast of that though. Krenzel's good numbers came (I felt and feel) when we did need them. When we were down in the early going and absolutely had to score, he was nearly perfect for a couple critical drives. Doesn't mean he didn't struggle in the first few series badly, and then again later at the end of the game, but he had some moments there.
Upvote
0