This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
    Dismiss Notice

I don't give a darn about your indie bands

Discussion in 'Open Discussion (Work-safe)' started by BigWoof31, Jan 14, 2010.

  1. Buckeneye

    Buckeneye With Rumple Minz, anything is possible.

    Ya know, I knew you'd be coming in saying how great it was sooner or later.

  2. jlb1705

    jlb1705 hipster doofus Staff Member Bookie

  3. The point is, once good indie music comes out, it hits the mainstream and becomes popular. Thus, it is no longer indie.
  4. sepia5

    sepia5 JoePa apologists = Pendejo

    Boy, I would disagree with that vehemently. Can you give me some kind of example?
  5. FCollinsBuckeye

    FCollinsBuckeye Senior Former Game Champion

    REM is a good example, having started on an 'indie' label.

  6. 3074326

    3074326 Urban Legend

    Mainstream music fucking sucks, for the most part.

    I hate to be that guy, but in this situation I'm going to be that guy.

    EDIT: I now realize that what I said doesn't really relate to what you said. But there is a lot of good music that's not popular. A lot.
  7. scarletandgrey

    scarletandgrey Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult!

    I don't think it all sucks just 90% of it.
  8. 3074326

    3074326 Urban Legend

    That's why I said for the most part. I like some of it. I'm not going to say who, because it's kind of embarrassing. :biggrin:
  9. Buckeye513

    Buckeye513 Legend

    Lady Gaga is the pinnacle of American lyricism.
    Deety likes this.
  10. FCollinsBuckeye

    FCollinsBuckeye Senior Former Game Champion

    Actually, 'indie' music can still be hugely popular, and still be 'indie'.

    All that makes music 'indie' is the fact that it's recorded for an 'independent' label (i.e. not one of the big labels, Columbia, RCA, Warner Bros, etc), no more, no less.

    Technically, the Beatles were an 'indie' band.

  11. gregorylee

    gregorylee I'd rather be napping!!

    Deety likes this.
  12. MililaniBuckeye

    MililaniBuckeye The satanic soulless freight train that is Ohio St Staff Member Tech Admin

    May you rot in hell...
  13. sepia5

    sepia5 JoePa apologists = Pendejo

    Yea, I guess we're getting into semantics now, as, in my opinion, the term "indie music" has morphed into something more than a mere reference to the abscence of a major music label, but I digress.

    Your REM example is a good one because I guess they eventually jumped to Warner Bros, if I'm not mistaken. Often, it seems like a jump to a major label precipitates a decline in the quality of the music. Honestly though, I would say the exact opposite of what DontHateOState said is true: most typically, a jump to a major label precipitates a decline in the originality and often quality of the music. JMO.

  14. Yes, that it a faux pas on me. I was associating the indie trend with the "misunderstood, we really know music, popular music isn't good" crowd.

    Although, I don't think I'm particularly far off. Even though the strict definition of indie is independent, many "indie fans" like indie music because it allows them to be different.
  15. Depends on how you define 'good', of course. Popular music is popular because many people find it 'good.'

Share This Page