antosu
Senior
This is info put together from the last few articles about this on espn.com
The accuser's personal attorney is saying that in the next few day's, the girl may decide to drop the criminal case and go with a civil suit.
This all came to light when a dna expert concluded that the accuser likely had sex with another man after her incident with Kobe and before she got to the hospital. None of the third party dna was found inside of the women but on her thighs. Which gives the impression that Kobe is being set up and more damage could of been done to her tissues during this second encounter with use of a condom(on purpose).
This evidence, coupled with the fact that she also had sex with two other men within two days before the incident with kobe, makes her case about 99% losing.
I mean a jury is supposed to believe that she would easily have sex with these joe smoes even after alledgedly being raped, but would turn down a handsome NBA star. This girl could of very well had been raped by Kobe but this is a losing case.
Her explanation for the other mans sperm being on her is that she put on some old dirty underwear after her shower and before her trip to the hospital. I guess she keeps her old spermy panties in the drawer with her clean ones.
If I were Kobe and I knew that I didn't commit rape, I would press charges on her for smearing my name and costing me millions of dollars with a false rape charge. But then again, his affair put him in this situation so maybe not.
The accuser's personal attorney is saying that in the next few day's, the girl may decide to drop the criminal case and go with a civil suit.
This all came to light when a dna expert concluded that the accuser likely had sex with another man after her incident with Kobe and before she got to the hospital. None of the third party dna was found inside of the women but on her thighs. Which gives the impression that Kobe is being set up and more damage could of been done to her tissues during this second encounter with use of a condom(on purpose).
This evidence, coupled with the fact that she also had sex with two other men within two days before the incident with kobe, makes her case about 99% losing.
I mean a jury is supposed to believe that she would easily have sex with these joe smoes even after alledgedly being raped, but would turn down a handsome NBA star. This girl could of very well had been raped by Kobe but this is a losing case.
Her explanation for the other mans sperm being on her is that she put on some old dirty underwear after her shower and before her trip to the hospital. I guess she keeps her old spermy panties in the drawer with her clean ones.
If I were Kobe and I knew that I didn't commit rape, I would press charges on her for smearing my name and costing me millions of dollars with a false rape charge. But then again, his affair put him in this situation so maybe not.
Last edited: