-
Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
- Thread starter ScriptOhio
- Start date
ScriptOhio
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
For one, Reese was recruited to Mississippi State by Florida offensive line coach John Hevesy and coach Dan Mullen. Two, his brother David Reese is currently a redshirt sophomore rush end for the Gators.
AARRGGHH!!
Last edited:
Upvote
0
ScriptOhio
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
Re: Taulia’s departure does leave the Crimson Tide with three scholarship quarterbacks -- redshirt junior Mac Jones, who started four games a season ago, redshirt freshman Paul Tyson, who played in one game last year, and freshman Bryce Young, an early 5-star enrollee.
Well, one of those three could be ahead of him on the depth chart or he just plain didn't like it there:
More speculation:
and Maryland, LSU, Tennessee, Florida, and UCF......
Entire article: https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/s...ulia-tagovailoa-entering-the-transfer-portal/
WOW!!!
Upvote
0
ScriptOhio
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
NCAA tables one-time transfer proposal to early next year
Rightly so, the NCAA as castigated and publicly pilloried for some of its decisions. This time, though, they got it right. For now.
Many, us included, criticized the NCAA back in April when its Board of Directors and its Presidential Forum recommended to the Division I Council that the proposal on a one-time transfer waiver is “not appropriate at this time.” Wednesday, the Council did the expected and tabled the proposal until January of next year.
From the NCAA’s release:
The resolution was recommended by the Transfer Waiver Working Group, which earlier this year had proposed a change to waiver guidelines that would have accomplished the same goal but through the waiver process instead of through a legislative change. Last month, the Division I Board of Directors indicated it preferred a legislative change and lifted the moratorium it had placed on transfer eligibility proposals last fall.
“The transfer environment has long been an issue of much discussion in Division I. The Division I Council is committed to a uniform and equitable approach to transfer rules that considers student-athlete well- being and the opportunities available after transfer,” said Council chair M. Grace Calhoun, athletics director at Pennsylvania. “We will not simply change the rule, but we will consider a comprehensive package designed to address the multiple complexities involved.”
The Council committed to work with conferences, schools, the Division I Student-Athlete Advisory Committee, the Division I Committee on Academics and other committees to form a permanent legislative solution
Currently, Division I rules permit student-athletes in all sports except baseball, men’s and women’s basketball, football and men’s ice hockey to immediately compete after a first transfer. Reliance on the waiver process for student-athletes in those five sports has put enormous strain on a historically collaborative process built to handle extenuating circumstances.
The resolution called the waiver process “an unsustainable method to achieve lasting stability, consistency and transparency within the transfer environment” and declared it was “never designed to accommodate sustained requests for relief from a rule without actually changing the rule.
The comprehensive package will address issues that impact transfer, including academic requirements, roster management considerations, transfer notification dates, accountability measures for schools that accept transfer students, and additional education on the transfer rules and process. The Committee on Academics will provide its guidance to any academic aspects of the package.
Given the uncertainty the coronavirus pandemic has caused across all sports, pushing this legislation back a few months is a very prudent move. Instantly granting thousands of football players — not to mention basketball players as well — a one-time free transfer pass at this time, while athletic departments are already stretched attempting to safely get their student-athletes back on the field, would’ve done exponentially more harm than good.
It’s expected that the legislation will be adopted at the NCAA convention in January, and will go into effect for the 2021-22 academic year.
Entire article: https://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/05/20/ncaa-tables-one-time-transfer-to-january/
Maybe it will pass for the 2021-2022 season, but this is the NCAA we are talking about; so who knows?
Rightly so, the NCAA as castigated and publicly pilloried for some of its decisions. This time, though, they got it right. For now.
Many, us included, criticized the NCAA back in April when its Board of Directors and its Presidential Forum recommended to the Division I Council that the proposal on a one-time transfer waiver is “not appropriate at this time.” Wednesday, the Council did the expected and tabled the proposal until January of next year.
From the NCAA’s release:
The resolution was recommended by the Transfer Waiver Working Group, which earlier this year had proposed a change to waiver guidelines that would have accomplished the same goal but through the waiver process instead of through a legislative change. Last month, the Division I Board of Directors indicated it preferred a legislative change and lifted the moratorium it had placed on transfer eligibility proposals last fall.
“The transfer environment has long been an issue of much discussion in Division I. The Division I Council is committed to a uniform and equitable approach to transfer rules that considers student-athlete well- being and the opportunities available after transfer,” said Council chair M. Grace Calhoun, athletics director at Pennsylvania. “We will not simply change the rule, but we will consider a comprehensive package designed to address the multiple complexities involved.”
The Council committed to work with conferences, schools, the Division I Student-Athlete Advisory Committee, the Division I Committee on Academics and other committees to form a permanent legislative solution
Currently, Division I rules permit student-athletes in all sports except baseball, men’s and women’s basketball, football and men’s ice hockey to immediately compete after a first transfer. Reliance on the waiver process for student-athletes in those five sports has put enormous strain on a historically collaborative process built to handle extenuating circumstances.
The resolution called the waiver process “an unsustainable method to achieve lasting stability, consistency and transparency within the transfer environment” and declared it was “never designed to accommodate sustained requests for relief from a rule without actually changing the rule.
The comprehensive package will address issues that impact transfer, including academic requirements, roster management considerations, transfer notification dates, accountability measures for schools that accept transfer students, and additional education on the transfer rules and process. The Committee on Academics will provide its guidance to any academic aspects of the package.
Given the uncertainty the coronavirus pandemic has caused across all sports, pushing this legislation back a few months is a very prudent move. Instantly granting thousands of football players — not to mention basketball players as well — a one-time free transfer pass at this time, while athletic departments are already stretched attempting to safely get their student-athletes back on the field, would’ve done exponentially more harm than good.
It’s expected that the legislation will be adopted at the NCAA convention in January, and will go into effect for the 2021-22 academic year.
Entire article: https://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/05/20/ncaa-tables-one-time-transfer-to-january/
Maybe it will pass for the 2021-2022 season, but this is the NCAA we are talking about; so who knows?
Upvote
0
ScriptOhio
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
Just sayin': I would think that players from the service academies entering the transfer portal would have more to do with "Do I really want to serve 5 years of active duty upon graduation?" than the usual football related issues, i.e. like playing time.
Upvote
0
ScriptOhio
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
Former USC quarterback JT Daniels chooses Georgia as transfer destination
Daniels spent two seasons with the Trojans
Daniels was one of the most heralded quarterback prospects in the Class of 2018. He was ranked No. 16 overall and was the second-ranked pro-style passer in his recruiting class. The only quarterbacks ranked higher than Daniels were Clemson's Trevor Lawrence and Ohio State's Justin Fields.
Daniels' move to Athens has raised some eyebrows around the college football world. Newman, who threw for 2,868 yards and 26 touchdowns last season, was presumed to be the unquestioned starter for the Bulldogs. He was so highly regarded that William Hill Sportsbook installed him as a 10-1 favorite to win the Heisman Trophy behind only Fields (7/2) and Lawrence (4-1) when odds were released on April 2.
Daniels, a redshirt sophomore, would have to receive an immediate-eligibility waiver from the NCAA in order to compete with Newman. He has at least two years of eligibility remaining. It's unclear whether he will pursue a waiver at this time. Several undergraduates have received such waivers including Fields, who started his career off at Georgia in 2018 before transferring to Columbus.
Entire article: https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...iels-chooses-georgia-as-transfer-destination/
He didn't put up Justin Fields' numbers, but he can play.
Daniels' stats: https://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/players/playerpage/2964582/jt-daniels
Fields' stats: https://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/players/playerpage/1273205/justin-fields
Upvote
0
Highly touted kid coming out of HS (#2 Pro QB, #16 overall in 247 composite), had a very "meh" season as a true freshman starter for a garbage USC team. Got injured early last season and missed the rest of the year. Hard to tell how much of the "meh" was the garbage coaching staff he played for and how much was him. I watched 2 USC games that year and was underwhelmed by him, but he was just a true freshman thrown to the wolves.
Upvote
0
I remember referring to him as the guy with the porn-stache playing the cable installer in certain '70s films.
He got notoriety for skipping his senior year in high school, but he had gone through 8th trade twice to give him more physical maturity than his classmates in high school, so he was the same age as other college frosh at USC.
And he wouldn't have beaten out a heathy Slovis at USC.
Upvote
0
ScriptOhio
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
https://247sports.com/Article/Will-Muschamp-talks-about-his-son-committing-to-Georgia-147611027/
My question is: Granted his "old man" can easily afford the tuition, etc., but regardless, would a 3 star QB turn down a full ride scholarship at Colorado State and walk on at Georgia (who already has a crowded QB room of 4 & 5 star guys)?
Last edited:
Upvote
0