• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Game Thread Ohio State @ Penn State - 09/29/18, 7:30PM (ABC)

Thats all we have to avoid IMO...Is it too much to ask for no games of 40+ yard runs??

with this years back 7 at their current level of performance? Yes.

Run fits and angles still challenge the fuck out of these guys. PSU RB can absolutely make them pay for when they are, seemingly inevitably, out of position.

Game comes down to Haskins and company out scoring them imo.

Pray it doesn't come down to FG's
 
Upvote 0
with this years back 7 at their current level of performance? Yes.

Run fits and angles still challenge the fuck out of these guys. PSU RB can absolutely make them pay for when they are, seemingly inevitably, out of position.

Game comes down to Haskins and company out scoring them imo.

Pray it doesn't come down to FG's
Yep that's what I think is more likely. Luckily PED is fairly poor on defense also. The best offense they played was App State which they gave up 38 to (31 without the kick return), they lack difference makers up front, and their LBs are IMO the worse they've fielded in a decade.

At this point I am fairly confident saying I want to see more from Schiano and Davis. I don't really care for our scheme to be frank. Too aggressive and just too many big plays given up.

Play the percentages. Stop the run on first down, play it down the middle on 2nd down and bring it on 3rd.

If they run for 150 on us (likely) then I'll dumb founded because it's their bread and butter. Issue is Trace is so good throwing the ball deep.

I'll say this... it wasnt Saquon who brought these fuckers back it was all Trace. If we lose next week I will take 1 thing as a win and it's we never have to play him again. He's such a bull shit QB but he's a winner.
 
Upvote 0
with this years back 7 at their current level of performance? Yes.

Run fits and angles still challenge the fuck out of these guys. PSU RB can absolutely make them pay for when they are, seemingly inevitably, out of position.

Game comes down to Haskins and company out scoring them imo.

Pray it doesn't come down to FG's
The idea of Nuerenberger having to hit a clutch field goal in Happy Valley is terrifying
 
Upvote 0
My wife (PSU alum) and I go to this game every year since we met, and this is the most confident I’ve ever felt on game week against these fucks.

I seriously think we break one off Saturday night...
Potential is there IMO... We were tested already and if we stop the run that will about do it.

They just have not been tested through the first 4 weeks. The best they faced was App State and that should tell you everything you need to know about their level of competition. Wouldn't surprise me if we handle them easily but I just have no faith in this back 7 right now.
 
Upvote 0
Differential Statistical Analysis (DSA): Pedophile Enabler U. Edition

The fifth game of the year is usually late enough in the season to get something of value from DSA, but this year I have to wonder.

Some of you may recall that DSA compares each team to other teams that your opponents have played. This early in the year, the small sample size and the wide variation in the strength of non-conference schedule makes DSA a crap shoot. This year, there has been more than sample size that skews the numbers.

For example, Ohio State's Defense went up against TCU's Offense indoors, while SMU's Defense faced them in the rain. Having seen the game, it seemed to me that they took very few steps to keep the balls dry or change them out, and there were quite a few issues as a result. All of this means that OSU's defense gave up more than SMU's did to TCU's offense, but I doubt there are many people in America who would take SMU's defense over the Silver Bullets.

Similarly, PSU's passing output is compared to other passing offenses that faced Pitt, including Georgia Tech. This doesn't seem like a very useful comparison.

Then there is the serious Buckeye Hangover that TCU and Rutgers (at least) seem to have. This has a negative effect on OSU's DSA numbers.

On top of all this, App State's game vs. USM was postponed or canceled (who cares which). This left Appie's only FBS opponent apart from PSU to be Charlotte. That's right, the same Charlotte that is even newer to FBS than Appie themselves. For this reason, as loathe as I am to discard data when I have so little to begin with, I discarded the App State game from the analysis of Penn State.

For those keeping track at home, there are a fair few things that would seem to skew DSA in PSU's favor, and we haven't even discussed the fact that Ohio State has coasted in the 2nd half in three of their games, whereas PSU seems to sleep walk through the first half and has had to keep the starters in much longer than OSU.

So with knowing a priori that we should expect this analysis to unfairly favor PSU, let's look at the numbers:

Differential Passing Offense

Ohio State: 1.85 (OSU gains 85% more through the air than their opponents give up, on average, to others)
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.86 (Arm-Punt McSorely throws for only 86% of the yardage that opponents typically give up)
Advantage: Ohio State - huge


Differential Pass Efficiency

Ohio State: 1.73
Pedophile Enabler U: 1.16
Advantage: Ohio State - significant


Differential Rushing Offense

Ohio State: 1.10
Pedophile Enabler U: 1.30
Advantage: Peds - moderate


Offensive First Downs

Ohio State: 1.51
Pedophile Enabler U: 1.08
Advantage: Ohio State - significant


Total Offense

Ohio State: 1.46
Pedophile Enabler U: 1.06
Advantage: Ohio State - substantial


Scoring Offense

Ohio State: 1.80
Pedophile Enabler U: 2.02
Advantage: Peds - moderate (When you consider that OSU has coasted in 3 of 4 second halves, I wouldn't read much into this)

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Differential Passing Defense

Ohio State: 0.84 (OSU only allows 84% as many passing yards as opponents gain, on average, against other FBS opponents)
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.65 (PSU defense giving up only 65% of their opponents' usual passing output)
Advantage: Peds - significant


Differential Pass Efficiency Defense

Ohio State: 1.02 (ugh)
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.80
Advantage: Peds - significant


Differential Rushing Defense

Ohio State: 0.93
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.89
Advantage: Peds - small


First Down Defense

Ohio State: 0.82
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.77
Advantage: Peds - small


Total Defense

Ohio State: 0.88
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.77
Advantage: Peds - moderate


Scoring Defense

Ohio State: 0.73
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.53
Advantage: Peds - moderate

_________________________________________________

For those of you who have read this far, you either remember or you've figured out already that DSA can provide a prediction for each of these statistics by using the DSA percentages and multiplying by each teams base stats. The ones that matter are the score, so here they are.

DSA Prediction: Peds 34 to 43 points
Bucks 24 to 29 points

Like I said, this analysis favored PSU for numerous reasons.

The only thing we can draw from this with any certainty is that which we already knew: If Ohio State does not solve the back 7 issues, or at least improve substantially, then Saturday will be a long night.

The offense is unbelievable, but the defense needs to live up to its potential for anything good to happen this year. They did it in 2014 (recall the crap fest against Cinci in Late September that year?); so we know it's possible.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
The Peds benefited tremendously from App State having been left off of their analysis, but DSA does show them to be a pretty good team.

Haskins and the boys will score on them practically at will, but even McSorely will be able to keep up if the defense doesn't show up. They only gave up one score vs Tulane and showed progress. Here's hoping it's a sign of things to come.
 
Upvote 0
Differential Statistical Analysis (DSA): Pedophile Enabler U. Edition

The fifth game of the year is usually late enough in the season to get something of value from DSA, but this year I have to wonder.

Some of you may recall that DSA compares each team to other teams that your opponents have played. This early in the year, the small sample size and the wide variation in the strength of non-conference schedule makes DSA a crap shoot. This year, there has been more than sample size that skews the numbers.

For example, Ohio State's Defense went up against TCU's Offense indoors, while SMU's Defense faced them in the rain. Having seen the game, it seemed to me that they took very few steps to keep the balls dry or change them out, and there were quite a few issues as a result. All of this means that OSU's defense gave up more than SMU's did to TCU's offense, but I doubt there are many people in America who would take SMU's defense over the Silver Bullets.

Similarly, PSU's passing output is compared to other passing offenses that faced Pitt, including Georgia Tech. This doesn't seem like a very useful comparison.

Then there is the serious Buckeye Hangover that TCU and Rutgers (at least) seem to have. This has a negative effect on OSU's DSA numbers.

On top of all this, App State's game vs. USM was postponed or canceled (who cares which). This left Appie's only FBS opponent apart from PSU to be Charlotte. That's right, the same Charlotte that is even newer to FBS than Appie themselves. For this reason, as loathe as I am to discard data when I have so little to begin with, I discarded the App State game from the analysis of Penn State.

For those keeping track at home, there are fair few things that would seem to skew DSA in PSU's favor, and we haven't even discussed the fact that Ohio State has coasted in the 2nd half in three of their games, whereas PSU seems to sleep walk through the first half and has had to keep the starters in much longer than OSU.

So with knowing a priori that we should expect this analysis to unfairly favor PSU, let's look at the numbers:

Differential Passing Offense

Ohio State: 1.85 (OSU gains 85% more through the air than their opponents give up, on average, to others)
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.86 (Arm-Punt McSorely throws for only 86% of the yardage that opponents typically give up)
Advantage: Ohio State - huge


Differential Pass Efficiency

Ohio State: 1.73
Pedophile Enabler U: 1.16
Advantage: Ohio State - significant


Differential Rushing Offense

Ohio State: 1.10
Pedophile Enabler U: 1.30
Advantage: Peds - moderate


Offensive First Downs

Ohio State: 1.51
Pedophile Enabler U: 1.08
Advantage: Ohio State - significant


Total Offense

Ohio State: 1.46
Pedophile Enabler U: 1.06
Advantage: Ohio State - substantial





Scoring Offense

Ohio State: 1.80
Pedophile Enabler U: 2.02
Advantage: Peds - moderate (When you consider that OSU has coasted in 3 of 4 second halves, I wouldn't read much into this)

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Differential Passing Defense

Ohio State: 0.84 (OSU only allows 84% as many passing yards as opponents gain, on average, against other FBS opponents)
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.65 (PSU defense giving up only 65% of their opponents' usual passing output)
Advantage: Peds - significant


Differential Pass Efficiency Defense

Ohio State: 1.02 (ugh)
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.80
Advantage: Peds - significant


Differential Rushing Defense

Ohio State: 0.93
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.89
Advantage: Peds - small


Offensive First Down Defense

Ohio State: 0.82
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.77
Advantage: Peds - small


Total Defense

Ohio State: 0.88
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.77
Advantage: Peds - moderate


Scoring Defense

Ohio State: 0.73
Pedophile Enabler U: 0.53
Advantage: Peds - moderate

_________________________________________________

For those of you who have read this far, you either remember or you've figured out already that DSA can provide a prediction for each of these statistics by using the DSA percentages and multiplying by each teams base stats. The ones that matter are the score, so here they are.

DSA Prediction: Peds 34 to 43 points
Bucks 24 to 29 points

Like I said, this analysis favored PSU for numerous reasons.

The only thing we can draw from this with any certainty is that which we already knew: If Ohio State does not solve the back 7 issues, or at least improve substantially, then Saturday will be a long night.

The offense is unbelievable, but the defense needs to live up to its potential for anything good to happen this year. They did it in 2014 (recall the crap fest against Cinci in Late September that year?); so we know it's possible.

DBB back with the muthafuckin DSA! Goddam, goddam, GODDAM!!!! Love it.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top