• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
if a fumble goes out of bounds, it is placed at the spot if the fumble if fumbled forward. placed at the spot where it went out of bounds if fumbled backwards.

So you're basically saying the latter happened, in my question? Because that set of circumstances happened, and the Big Ten refs gave Purdue a first down, where they otherwise would've been forced to attempt a field goal.
 
Upvote 0
Thanks. Wonder if the Big Ten will acknowledge the mistake. Not sure what you think about SEC officiating, but I've been saying for years that Big Ten officiating is the worst. By far--I watch a fair bit of non-Big Ten CFB games.

the 2006 LSU vs Auburn game was possibly the worst officiated game i have ever seen in my life.

it’s still the only college football game i ever watched that i actually thought was “fixed”.
 
Upvote 0
oh and it was the same play as the Devin White “targeting” call.

so actually 45 yards total on the play.

snap took place at Miss St 12.

interception returned to the 13.

however due to the penalties, next snap was Miss St ball at the LSU 42.

haven’t heard much talk about the celebration penalties due to the White targeting call.

The guys on the First Team gave it their "Lowlight" of the weekend.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Dear Nutriaitch,

Thanks for your interest in becoming a B1G Official. We regret to inform you that your application was denied for the following reasons: Proper understanding and application of the rule-book. We encourage to apply again when you have a lesser understanding of the rules.

Jim Delany

Dear Mr Delany,

A quick review of my post history will clearly show my absolute lack of shame. I have always had an uncanny ability to make up my own rules and regulations as I go. I also have zero fear of accepting bribes and kickbacks.
This clearly puts me in the very upper echelon of applicants for B1G ref.
Especially considering that at least one per game I would call something egregious against Ped St (even if they’re not playing in the game i’m calling). For no reason other than to get a good laugh while reading the conspiracy theories on BWI after the game.

Sincerely,
Nutriaitch
 
Upvote 0
Dear Mr Delany,

A quick review of my post history will clearly show my absolute lack of shame. I have always had an uncanny ability to make up my own rules and regulations as I go. I also have zero fear of accepting bribes and kickbacks.
This clearly puts me in the very upper echelon of applicants for B1G ref.
Especially considering that at least one per game I would call something egregious against Ped St (even if they’re not playing in the game i’m calling). For no reason other than to get a good laugh while reading the conspiracy theories on BWI after the game.

Sincerely,
Nutriaitch

tenor.gif
 
Upvote 0
So you're basically saying the latter happened, in my question? Because that set of circumstances happened, and the Big Ten refs gave Purdue a first down, where they otherwise would've been forced to attempt a field goal.

And this is why I'm really concerned about UFM and his mindset.

This was probably the only time Saturday I was really pissed off - they let that shit go without even a challenge or a complaint? Even as little as last year UFM would have lost his shit on the sideline about that call and the lack of explanation surrounding it.

Everyone seemed to just accept it when it was clearly incorrect. It's mind-boggling to me.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top