• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Penn State Cult (Joe Knew)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
ORD_Buckeye;2191092; said:
You don't think Emmert got wind of that statement at the time, and now Lubrano and McCombie are filing nuisance appeals and threatening to pull the ncaa into a legal battle.

I find it very interesting that the ncaa hasn't quickly swatted down these two idiots' appeal as they did with the Paternos. My hunch is that something is going on behind the scenes. Something perhaps along the lines of organizing a conference call with the 18 ncaa directors.
Click to expand...

Just because they haven't reported it in the news, doesn't mean Emmert hasn't already told him that it ain't going to happen.
 
Upvote 0
alexhortdog95;2191078; said:
Here's where I'm getting mixed up at guys:



By this definition, I'm seeing that the Board president should be signing this document (Peetz) unless she gave....AHHHHHHHHHHH

So, you guys are saying she probably gave permission to Erickson to sign the document on behalf of the trustees? If so, that's pretty ballsy too.
Click to expand...

Does it matter who had the authority to do what at Penn State? That's an issue for PSU to have worked out BEFORE discussing sanctions with the NCAA. Look at it from the NCAA viewpoint. I believe they deal with the president or chancellor of the university and any signature agreeing to the sanctions is considered valid. If someone else in authority at Penn State tries to appeal the sanctions then the NCAA should determine if the institution as a whole is violating rules by their action - ethical behavior, in control. It's ridiculous that a BOT member is filing as an individual and not as a representative of the school. What the NCAA sees is that a member of the BOT is filing an appeal.
 
Upvote 0
4skers89;2191166; said:
Different from the RoBOT's appeal. http://www.centredaily.com/2012/08/07/3290516/former-penn-state-players-also.html

Is there a third one?:popcorn:
Click to expand...

"Meaning no disrespect to the victims of abuse, these findings are unfair and they are wrong."
Click to expand...

This quote sums it up...Pretty much saying sorry you were raped, but Penn State had no part of it. Yeah okay...who are these clowns anyways? I didn't recognize one name, but I also don't follow these shitheads closely either
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top