Zurp
I have misplaced my pants.
Based on your opinions, which seasons have been the best (most accurate) picks for contenders in the national championship game? Which seasons have been the worst? I'm not talking about "year X had a boring game", but more like, "year X had this team that didn't belong", or "year Y had the BCS picking the perfect two teams to play each other".
In my opinion, here's my ranking of the worst selections:
1. 2011 - The rematch was a horrible deal. But the alternative was Oklahoma State? Really? Pretty much no team deserved to play against LSU. Maybe that point can be argued now that LSU lost to Alabama. There was no winning for the BCS as a system in 2011. Note: if it wasn't a rematch, this probably would not have been in the top 5.
2. 2007 - By default, Ohio State and LSU made it. But in reality, no one deserved to be there. The only thing that kept it from being worse than 2011 was that it wasn't a rematch.
3. 2004 - Not to argue that one team deserved to be in the national championship game over either of the other two, but the BCS is going to lose about 33% of their credibility any time an undefeated team from a major conference (the SEC, in this case) doesn't make it to the national championship game. The BCS was going to lose no matter which team got left out.
4. 2003 - Just like 2004, they had to leave someone out. Personally, I'm glad it was USC because I enjoy their crying. But all three teams had one loss, so I don't mind it as much as the 2004 BCS national championship game.
I'll have to think about each of the seasons to figure out my rankings for the best.
In my opinion, here's my ranking of the worst selections:
1. 2011 - The rematch was a horrible deal. But the alternative was Oklahoma State? Really? Pretty much no team deserved to play against LSU. Maybe that point can be argued now that LSU lost to Alabama. There was no winning for the BCS as a system in 2011. Note: if it wasn't a rematch, this probably would not have been in the top 5.
2. 2007 - By default, Ohio State and LSU made it. But in reality, no one deserved to be there. The only thing that kept it from being worse than 2011 was that it wasn't a rematch.
3. 2004 - Not to argue that one team deserved to be in the national championship game over either of the other two, but the BCS is going to lose about 33% of their credibility any time an undefeated team from a major conference (the SEC, in this case) doesn't make it to the national championship game. The BCS was going to lose no matter which team got left out.
4. 2003 - Just like 2004, they had to leave someone out. Personally, I'm glad it was USC because I enjoy their crying. But all three teams had one loss, so I don't mind it as much as the 2004 BCS national championship game.
I'll have to think about each of the seasons to figure out my rankings for the best.