This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
    Dismiss Notice

Tibor - What Were You Thinking?

Discussion in 'Open Discussion (Work-safe)' started by BuckBackHome, Jun 13, 2004.

  1. BuckBackHome

    BuckBackHome Wolverine is largest member of weasel family

  2. MightbeaBuck

    MightbeaBuck with hat in hand


    Frustrated by malpractice cases, doctor proposes not treating some lawyers

    The Associated Press
    6/13/04 8:27 PM

    CHICAGO (AP) -- A doctor's proposal asking the American Medical Association to endorse refusing care to attorneys involved in medical malpractice cases drew an angry response from colleagues Sunday at the annual meeting of the nation's largest physicians group.

    Many doctors stood up to denounce the resolution in passionate speeches -- even after its sponsor, Dr. J. Chris Hawk, asked that it be withdrawn.

    Hawk, a South Carolina surgeon, said he made the proposal to draw attention to rising medical malpractice costs. The resolution asks that the AMA tell doctors that -- except in emergencies -- it is not unethical to refuse care to plaintiffs' attorneys and their spouses.

    "It expresses the frustration I have with a broken system," said Hawk. He said doctors are leaving his state or retiring early because of insurance premiums -- making it harder for patients to receive care.

    Neurologist Michael Williams said although he understood Hawk's frustration, the resolution never should have been introduced because it seeks to discriminate against a group of people.

    The resolution left the AMA "a really big mess to clean up," Williams said.

    For years, the AMA's top legislative lobbying priority has been the medical malpractice system, and some delegates said the resolution could hurt those efforts by giving trial lawyers ammunition.

    AMA committees considered more than 250 reports and resolutions Sunday. The committees will make recommendations to the group's delegates, who will begin voting Monday afternoon on policies to adopt.

    Last week, the daughter of a Mississippi legislator said she was denied treatment by a plastic surgeon because her father opposes limits in damage suits against doctors.

    Dr. Michael Kanosky said he referred Kimberly Banks to other plastic surgeons to have her burn scars removed because he had lobbied on the other side of the issue and saw an ethical conflict.
  3. tibor75

    tibor75 Banned

    I do believe this violates the Hippopotamus oath....
  4. BrutusBobcat

    BrutusBobcat Icon and Entertainer

    Isn't Tibor's specialty cardiac? I hardly think that a cardiac surgeon would have cause to operate on a lawyer. :tongue2:
  5. MililaniBuckeye

    MililaniBuckeye The satanic soulless freight train that is Ohio St Staff Member Tech Admin

    tibor fully endorses the Hypocritical Oath...

Share This Page