• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

University Athletic Departments Revenue & Spending

Muck;1832351; said:
You need more than a single year's (or actually two years in this case) data to chart trends.
correct.

Some of these school may have had an incredibly bad decline in the previous year.
Whereas even with growth this year, they are still showing a decline over the last several years.
 
Upvote 0
Gatorubet;1832201; said:
http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/....ensbsn.com/2010/11/sec-rev...-money-machine/

The Top 100 Revenue Schools in the NCAA
1. Texas ? $143.5 million; 3.7% growth from 2008-09
2. Alabama ? $129.3 million; 24.4% growth *
3. Ohio State ? $123.2 million; 2.8% growth
4. Florida ? $116.5 million; 7.6% growth
5. LSU ? $109.9 million; 9.9% growth
6. Michigan ? $106.6 million; 12.1% growth
7. Penn State ? $106.6 million; 11.1% growth

8. Tennessee ? $100.7 million; 8.9% growth
9. Oklahoma ? $98.6 million; 21.1% growth

10. Wisconsin ? $93.9 million; 4.5% growth
11. Auburn ? $92.6 million; 6.4% growth
12. Notre Dame ? $90.8 million; 12.1% growth
13. Iowa ? $88.5 million; 11.3% growth
14. Georgia ? $88.0 million; 8.0% growth
15. Virginia ? $81.8 million; 21.9% growth
16. Stanford ? $81.7 million; 9.4% growth
17. Michigan State ? $80.0 million; 5.9% growth
18. South Carolina ? $80.0 million; 4.9% growth
19. Kentucky ? $79.7 million; 10.6% growth
20. Arkansas ? $78.1 million; 22.0% growth
21. USC ? $75.7 million; 5.5% decline
22. Oregon ? $75.4 million; 25.1% growth
23. Florida State ? $75.2 million; 1.1$ growth
24. Minnesota ? $73.6 million; 4.7% growth
25. Nebraska ? $73.5 million; 1.9% decline

26. Kansas ? $71.8 million; 1.8% growth
27. Texas A&M ? $71.8 million; 1.4% decline
28. California ? $69.0 million; 5.9% decline
29. Indiana ? $68.7 million; 13.5% growth
30. Duke ? $68.5 million; 3.6% decline
31. North Carolina ? $67.6 million; 3.6% decline
32. Oklahoma State ? $65.5 million; 8.7% decline
33. Boston College ? $64.5 million; 0.5% growth
34. Washington ? $64.0 million; 5.7% growth
35. Louisville ? $63.5 million; 9.4% growth
36. West Virginia ? $62.0 million; 11.4% growth
37. UCLA ? $61.8 million; 6.5% decline
38. Purdue ? $61.5 million; 2.7% growth
39. UNLV ? $61.2 million; 84.6% growth
40. Connecticut ? $58.5 million; 0.0% growth
41. Virginia Tech ? $58.1 million; 10.0% growth

42. Clemson ? $57.6 million; 4.3% decline
43. Arizona State ? $57.0 million; 7.1% growth
44. Arizona ? $56.4 million; 8.8% growth
45. Miami (Fla) ? $56.1 million; 9.5% decline
46. Missouri ? $55.7 million; 3.6% decline
47. Rutgers ? $55.6 million; 2.3% growth

48. Baylor ? $54.1 million; 11.1% growth
49. Illinois ? $53.5 million; 3.8% decline
50. TCU ? $52.4 million; 12.8% growth
51. Kansas State ? $52.4 million; 10.6% growth
52. Maryland ? $52.0 million; 13.3% decline
53. Oregon State ? $51.6 million; 2.9% growth
54. North Carolina State ? $50.3 million; 8.3% growth
55. Vanderbilt ? $50.0 million; 9.5% growth
56. Colorado ? $49.4 million; 0.9% decline
57. Syracuse ? $49.3 million; 5.2% decline
58. Pittsburgh ? $49.2 million; 7.4% growth

59. Northwestern ? $48.9 million; 0.7% growth
60. Texas Tech ? $48.1 million; 3.1% growth
61. Georgia Tech ? $47.0 million; 2.2% decline
62. Iowa State ? $46.8 million; 2.3% growth
63. Mississippi ? $43.9 million; 6.3% growth
64. Wake Forest ? $42.2 million; 5.4% decline
65. BYU ? $41.0 million; 15.1% growth
66. Washington State ? $39.3 million; 2.8% growth
67. South Florida ? $39.1 million; 3.5% growth
68. Mississippi State ? $38.1 million; 4.4% growth
69. Cincinnati ? $37.1 million; 5.9% growth
70. Memphis ? $37.0 million; 10.3% growth
71. Yale ? $36.5 million; 84.1% growth
72. SMU ? $36.0 million; 1.8% growth
73. Central Florida ? $35.7 million; 19.0% growth
74. St. John?s ? $32.1 million; 8.0% growth
75. San Diego State ? $32.1 million; 6.9% decline
76. Utah ? $31.8 million; 0.3% growth
77. Delaware ? $31.8 million; 4.6% growth
78. Houston ? $31.5 million; 6.6% growth
79. Hawaii ? $31.1 million; 1.9% growth
80. East Carolina ? $30.8 million; 1.0% growth
81. New Mexico ? $30.3 million; 5.4% decline
82. Pennsylvania ? $30.4 million; 12.9% growth
83. Rice ? $29.4 million; 4.0% decline
84. Georgetown ? $29.4 million; 1.4% growth
85. James Madison ? $29.1 million; 2.3% decline
86. Temple ? $28.8 million; 7.1% growth
87. Villanova ? $27.7 million; 7.9% growth
88. Wyoming ? $27.0 million; 9.4% growth
89. Old Dominion ? $26.7 million; 1.8% decline
90. Liberty ? $26.4 million; 11.6% growth
91. Tulsa ? $26.3 million; 3.1% decline
92. Fresno State ? $26.0 million; 9.5% decline
93. Miami (Ohio) ? $26.0 million; 5.2% growth
94. New Hampshire ? $26.0 million; 3.2% growth
95. Boston University ? $25.7 million; 5.8% growth
96. Boise State ? $25.1 million; 21.9% growth **
97. UAB ? $25.1 million; 10.8% growth
98. Central Michigan ? $24.5 million; 9.0% growth
99. Ohio ? $23.9 million; 9.2% growth
100. Massachusetts ? $23.8 million; 0.8% growth

* 24% growth :shake: assholes!
** We are proven. We play on a blue field...
bold are the big ten schools.
red are schools with geographically close and/or other reasons that maybe considered for expansion purposes.

sorting through the red guys in some sort of logical, academic, athletic (basketball/football [hockey]), along with cultural order is for someone else...
 
Upvote 0
correct.

some of these school may have had an abnormally high growth in the previous year.
where as even with a dropoff this year, they are still showing a growth over the last several years.
i look to a team like the hoosier who have had a short term infusion with a) renovated stadium and b) new basketball coach, offset by c) a sucky football team that go their coach canned.

bet yes, static scoring is foolish...
 
Upvote 0
Gatorubet;1832201; said:
http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/college-football/college-football/www.ensbsn.com/2010/11/sec-rev...-money-machine/

The Top 100 Revenue Schools in the NCAA
1. Texas ? $143.5 million; 3.7% growth from 2008-09
2. Alabama ? $129.3 million; 24.4% growth *
3. Ohio State ? $123.2 million; 2.8% growth
4. Florida ? $116.5 million; 7.6% growth
5. LSU ? $109.9 million; 9.9% growth
6. Michigan ? $106.6 million; 12.1% growth
7. Penn State ? $106.6 million; 11.1% growth
8. Tennessee ? $100.7 million; 8.9% growth
9. Oklahoma ? $98.6 million; 21.1% growth
10. Wisconsin ? $93.9 million; 4.5% growth
11. Auburn ? $92.6 million; 6.4% growth
12. Notre Dame ? $90.8 million; 12.1% growth
13. Iowa ? $88.5 million; 11.3% growth
14. Georgia ? $88.0 million; 8.0% growth
15. Virginia ? $81.8 million; 21.9% growth
16. Stanford ? $81.7 million; 9.4% growth
17. Michigan State ? $80.0 million; 5.9% growth
18. South Carolina ? $80.0 million; 4.9% growth
19. Kentucky ? $79.7 million; 10.6% growth
20. Arkansas ? $78.1 million; 22.0% growth
21. USC ? $75.7 million; 5.5% decline
22. Oregon ? $75.4 million; 25.1% growth
23. Florida State ? $75.2 million; 1.1$ growth
24. Minnesota ? $73.6 million; 4.7% growth
25. Nebraska ? $73.5 million; 1.9% decline

etc., etc...

Interesting, partially for the striking differences when compared to the Forbes Magazine "valuation" of the football programs. Not sure if your numbers are football, or overall athletic department, but here's the Forbes list - this came out in January 2010, so a new listing should be out in a month or so.

1. Texas Value: $119 million Profit: $59 million
2. Notre Dame Value: $108 million Profit: $38 million
3. Penn State Value: $99 millionProfit: $50 million
4. Nebraska Value: $93 million Profit: $49 million
5. Alabama Value: $92 million Profit: $38 million
6. Florida Value: $88 million Profit: $41 million
7. LSU
Value: $86 million Profit: $39 million
8. Ohio State Value: $85 million Profit: $36 million
9. Georgia Value: $84 million Profit: $45 million
10. Oklahoma Value: $83 million Profit: $40 million

Methodology and all top-20 rankings here:

http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/22/mo...l-teams-business-sports-college-football.html
 
Upvote 0
Interesting, partially for the striking differences when compared to the Forbes Magazine "valuation" of the football programs. Not sure if your numbers are football, or overall athletic department, but here's the Forbes list - this came out in January 2010, so a new listing should be out in a month or so.

1. Texas Value: $119 million Profit: $59 million
2. Notre Dame Value: $108 million Profit: $38 million
3. Penn State Value: $99 millionProfit: $50 million
4. Nebraska Value: $93 million Profit: $49 million
5. Alabama Value: $92 million Profit: $38 million
6. Florida Value: $88 million Profit: $41 million
7. LSU
Value: $86 million Profit: $39 million
8. Ohio State Value: $85 million Profit: $36 million
9. Georgia Value: $84 million Profit: $45 million
10. Oklahoma Value: $83 million Profit: $40 million

Methodology and all top-20 rankings here:

http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/22/mo...l-teams-business-sports-college-football.html
heres the rest of that list.

11-michigan
12-south carolina
13-tenn
14-auburn
15-usc
16-msu
17-arkansas
18-texas am
19-wisc
20-ok st



well the forbes list "values" football teams as if they were publicly traded stocks, versus revenue for all sports
 
Upvote 0
Gatorubet;1832201; said:
http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/....ensbsn.com/2010/11/sec-rev...-money-machine/
The Top 9 Revenue Schools in the SEC


  1. Alabama ? $129.3 million; 24.4% growth
  2. Florida ? $116.5 million; 7.6% growth
  3. LSU ? $109.9 million; 9.9% growth
  4. Tennessee ? $100.7 million; 8.9% growth
  5. Auburn ? $92.6 million; 6.4% growth
  6. Georgia ? $88.0 million; 8.0% growth
  7. South Carolina ? $80.0 million; 4.9% growth
  8. Kentucky ? $79.7 million; 10.6% growth
  9. Arkansas ? $78.1 million; 22.0% growth
just wanted to high-lite this for that Arky fan who thought his school was higher up the pecking order than they actually are.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top