This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
    Dismiss Notice

When does "great offense" equal crappy defense?

Discussion in 'College Football' started by Jake, Nov 29, 2008.

  1. BB73

    BB73 Loves Buckeye History Staff Member Bookie '16 & '17 Upset Contest Winner

    It was 31 in regulation. I just re-watched that game this morning. :wink2:
     
  2. Jake

    Jake Forget it, he's rolling. ‘17 The Deuce Champ '18 The Deuce Champ Fantasy Baseball Champ

    Even better. Nebraska's lousy offense scored more points in 4 quarters versus Arizona than Oregon's "great" offense. :biggrin:
     
  3. Jake

    Jake Forget it, he's rolling. ‘17 The Deuce Champ '18 The Deuce Champ Fantasy Baseball Champ

    Ohio State 26
    Oregon 17

    I think we have the answer. :)
     
  4. matcar

    matcar Mostly banned

    Not so fast sir. I think Oregon does have quite an offense. Just ran into a buzz saw today.
     
  5. Jake

    Jake Forget it, he's rolling. ‘17 The Deuce Champ '18 The Deuce Champ Fantasy Baseball Champ

    I think they played some crappy defenses. We saw what a real defense could do to them today.

    Moreover, it's not just about the Ducks. It's about 51-42 games where media and "fans" rave about the 51 points scored and overlook the 42 points allowed along the way. Read the entire thread.

    Cincinnati's "great offense", and the same media and "fans", appear to be learning a similar lesson as I type.
     
  6. matcar

    matcar Mostly banned

    Look, from what I saw from Oregon, the offense was pretty damn good and our defense, played an incredible game. To knock Oregon's offense is to denegrate what our defense did today...don't ruin it.
     
  7. Jake

    Jake Forget it, he's rolling. ‘17 The Deuce Champ '18 The Deuce Champ Fantasy Baseball Champ

    I'm not ruining anything. You missed the point of the entire thread. It is much bigger than today's game. :roll1:
     
  8. matcar

    matcar Mostly banned

    I think you missed the point where Oregon actually has a pretty good offense. You cheapen what our defense did when you say stupid shit like you do.
     
    Zurp, generaladm and MililaniBuckeye like this.
  9. Zurp

    Zurp I have misplaced my pants.

    I agree. Ohio State showed that they could hold Oregon to 17 points in a 60-minute football game. But in a 75-minute football game, Oregon may easily score another 17 points. Who knows?

    Of course, Ohio State's game plan was created around a 60-minute football game, and it worked beautifully. If the game were 75 minutes, they'd make another game plan that may work just as well. My point is (I know I'm not making it clearly) that Oregon has a very good offense that Ohio State shut down very well. Just because Ohio State's defense is that good, doesn't mean that Oregon's offense isn't that good.
     
    matcar likes this.
  10. Jake

    Jake Forget it, he's rolling. ‘17 The Deuce Champ '18 The Deuce Champ Fantasy Baseball Champ

    Gee, really? I had no idea. Oregon's offense is actually pretty good. If only that was the point of the thread. :roll1:

    I'll say it again, this thread existed a year before we played Oregon, and it goes way beyond Oregon. It is more about public perception of "great football", and our dominance of Oregon's offense drove the point home.

    This thread wasn't "stupid" until you came along. It is obvious you didn't read it before firing off insults.
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2010
    matcar likes this.
  11. Coqui

    Coqui Senior

    To an extent....yes. I knew they would not be in contention to get the SEC championship. I figured LSU would lose to Alabama and Florida. I didn't realize Les Miles would forget how to coach for the Ole Miss game (speaking about clock management)

    After seeing the pairings between LSU and PSU, I figured PSU would win.

    So the only surprise this season was the Mississippi game for me.
     
    matcar likes this.
  12. matcar

    matcar Mostly banned

    Actually, you're incorrect as usual. This thread is a discussion of whens and ifs, but your foolish arrogance and need to bash Oregon after our win negates the fact that Oregon DOES have a great offense and it's NOT because the Pac10 only has no defense...their offense stands on it own despite our defensive dominance. But you're too young and immature to own that.

    Good job learning....or....maybe not.
     
  13. Steve19

    Steve19 Watching. Always watching. Staff Member

    Let me move this back onto the thread topic. I wasn't terribly surprised that the Big Ten did as well as it did in the bowl games that mattered. I was a bit surprised that the PAC 10 did so poorly.

    What is the best way to detect if great offense in a conference is really bad defense?
     
  14. DaytonBuck

    DaytonBuck I've always liked them

  15. Buckeye86

    Buckeye86 I do not choose to discuss it

    ESPN is always spot on in their analysis.
     
    osugrad21 likes this.

Share This Page