Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not sure how they’d prove it
This is what one calls an argument when you have nothing to work with. They should have cut a deal.That's the argument they are going to go with really? Not that the we didn't have any idea what he was doing and he was rogue. But no impact
Well, if it was a document that was supposed to be from 1972 and it was actually created on a modern computer in MS Word using Times New Roman, printed and then photocopied three or four times to distort it…Not sure how they’d prove it
That's a lie.Classic propaganda tactic: “Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth.”
Yeah but what about the Pandas?I don't want them suspended.
I want them beaten, humiliated, then punished.
Just so there is no doubt that they were never good enough without cheating the way they did.
Hahahahahahahaha
I mean, holy shit.....
Seriously though I wanted that too until Dan "i have screamed for Ohio State to get the death penalty twice" Wetzel got involved like "meh. Its a nothing burger" and then tried to launder Michigans response to the B1G which I can only assume was tactically intentionally douche bag on acid to enrage the rest of the conference to overreact.I don't want them suspended.
I want them beaten, humiliated, then punished.
Just so there is no doubt that they were never good enough without cheating the way they did.
If this were so "dubious"... then why the video evidence of the coaches taking said junior analyst's words and directly translating them to on-field calls?
I'm also looking at it like this; let's pretend Harbaugh didn't "know". Somebody ( the OC and DC) had to verify this little shits work, because they wouldn't just fly off cuff and call a check pre-snap on hunches from a low level staffer. Meaning, at minimum, THEY knew this information and scouting was likely illegally obtained.
At which point, if they suspect a violation has occurred, are they not required to report it? Even then, I'm treating it like receiving stolen property. If you receive stolen property, if there's any evidence to suggest you intentionally and/or willfully ignored where it came from, you can be held criminally and financially responsible along with whomever did the stealing.
Can we explain how this is any different than my example?
Hahahahahahahaha
I mean, holy shit.....