• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Big Ten and other Conference Expansion

Which Teams Should the Big Ten Add? (please limit to four selections)

  • Boston College

    Votes: 32 10.2%
  • Cincinnati

    Votes: 19 6.1%
  • Connecticut

    Votes: 6 1.9%
  • Duke

    Votes: 21 6.7%
  • Georgia Tech

    Votes: 55 17.6%
  • Kansas

    Votes: 46 14.7%
  • Maryland

    Votes: 67 21.4%
  • Missouri

    Votes: 90 28.8%
  • North Carolina

    Votes: 39 12.5%
  • Notre Dame

    Votes: 209 66.8%
  • Oklahoma

    Votes: 78 24.9%
  • Pittsburgh

    Votes: 45 14.4%
  • Rutgers

    Votes: 40 12.8%
  • Syracuse

    Votes: 18 5.8%
  • Texas

    Votes: 121 38.7%
  • Vanderbilt

    Votes: 15 4.8%
  • Virginia

    Votes: 47 15.0%
  • Virginia Tech

    Votes: 62 19.8%
  • Stay at 12 teams and don't expand

    Votes: 27 8.6%
  • Add some other school(s) not listed

    Votes: 25 8.0%

  • Total voters
    313
I'm wondering if, after a few years of high cost travel for non-revenue sports, USC and UCLA don't try and work out a sweetheart deal much like ND, in the Big Ten only for football and mens basketball and in the PAC for all other sports.

Frankly, the only sport where I see this paying off for those two schools is football. The travel schedule is gonna be a killer for basketball and academics.
Nope. Pac is practically dead and there are a lot of hurt feelings there. They will probably just lobby for Stanford, Washington, Oregon.
 
They can go get their “Shine box.”

8dee65a9e46e3ff6d4f976e044e3777b.jpg
 

Mike80

Identity missing....
  • Commish: Big Ten will consider adding 12th member

    DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) -- Big Ten officials will likely discuss expanding to 12 schools to accommodate the new Big Ten Network, commissioner Jim Delany said.

    The network, which is scheduled to launch Aug. 30, would benefit from an additional big-name university in a large television market, Delany said.

    "I think we need to look at it in the next year," he told the Des Moines Register on Wednesday. He offered no specific candidates.

    "The broader (the network) is distributed, the more value (expansion) has. We have eight states. With expansion, you could have nine," he said.

    In football, a 12th school could mean two divisions and a postseason playoff. That's an appealing concept to the startup network.

    In football, a 12th school could mean two divisions and a postseason playoff. That's an appealing concept to the startup network.

    "Any television executive would do whatever they could to be able to air a game like the Big Ten championship," said Mark Silverman, Big Ten Network president. "It would be worth a considerable amount of value."

    Coaches think otherwise, said Iowa head football coach Kirk Ferentz.

    "I've not met anybody in coaching that really enjoys it," Ferentz said of the divisional playoff format. "There's a lot of downside to it, in my opinion."

    Among the concerns are missing out on a BCS bowl by losing the
    conference title game.

    Delany said expansion would not guarantee the Big Ten would create an extra game.

    Here we go again......

    SI.com
     
    sandgk;889149; said:
    The one good thing he mentions adding a ninth state to the eight state conference - so unless South Bend is considered in a State of it's own the Commish surely doesn't eye ND as a target.

    Oh wait - forget I said that ...

    I caught that first part too....

    Does that mean Missouri or maybe Louisville??

    If it isn't ND, the choices for this "idea" :smash: are kinda slim....
     
    Upvote 0
    starBUCKS;889152; said:
    Back to talks of Mizzou?? Notre Dame doesn't want to give up that NBC money... unless their contract is up.

    The TV contract was renewed in 2008 I think....

    It might be up after this year I don't know....

    They are giving up on having their games broadcast nationally on Westwood One after this year as well....
     
    Last edited:
    Upvote 0
    If this has to be done, I'd like to pick up Louisville. Quality football team, and good tradition for basketball.
    "Any television executive would do whatever they could to be able to air a game like the Big Ten championship," said Mark Silverman, Big Ten Network president. "It would be worth a considerable amount of value."
    Never mind devaluing the greatest rivalry game in sports. :smash: Television executives, from a not yet started nor successful network no less, should not be involved in this monumental decision.

    a) Split up OSU/UM, risk a repeat :bonk:
    b) Put OSU/UM in the same division, risk a 'b12 north' parallel in the other division :sick1:
     
    Upvote 0
    Back
    Top