• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

2006 Ohio State Outlook: Defense

I think it was mentioned in the BGSU game thread, but we now officially lead the nation in scoring defense at 9.3 ppg. The top five are:

1. Ohio State (9.3)
2. Florida (9.5)
3. LSU (10.0)
3. Rutgers (10.0)
5. Texas (10.8)

We are also tied for #1 in interceptions and are #3 in turnover margin.
 
Upvote 0
Turnovers, 3-and-outs, and points-per-game averages are all fun ways to measure defenses relative to each other. But I think that that's really all that they are. I don't think I'd mind very much (well, maybe a little) if they NEVER forced turnovers, NEVER sacked the quarterback, gave up 30+ ppg, and opposing teams drove up and down the field like an Inuit with a team of sled-dogs. As long as they're getting the wins.

We can say stuff like, "With the defense playing like they did against Northern Illinois, Ohio State won't beat Texas." Then the defense steps up against Texas, and we see a 24-7 game. Then we watch a couple more games, and we say, "With the offense playing like they did against Cincinnati and Penn State, Ohio State won't beat Iowa." Then Ohio State beats Iowa by 3 touchdowns.

Maybe it's my total faith in Tressel and the rest of the coaching staff, but I just don't think it's worth it to worry about whether Ohio State can and will step up against the bigger teams. Sure - the sacks, the turnovers, the three-and-outs, the points-per-game and yardage averages are fun to talk about, but they seem to rarely translate to how Ohio State will do in the next game.
 
Upvote 0
Zurp: With great respect for your stimulating posts, I believe some team stats go along with championships, generally speaking. Mainly, a robust defense has almost always followed championships, especially in college ball. Before you lower the boom on my opinion, I concede, there are exceptions once in awhile:wink2:
 
Upvote 0
Zurp;629130; said:
Turnovers, 3-and-outs, and points-per-game averages are all fun ways to measure defenses relative to each other. But I think that that's really all that they are. I don't think I'd mind very much (well, maybe a little) if they NEVER forced turnovers, NEVER sacked the quarterback, gave up 30+ ppg, and opposing teams drove up and down the field like an Inuit with a team of sled-dogs. As long as they're getting the wins.

Through all the games, the scoring defense has been the constant. Some teams have run well against us and some have passed well against us, but none have scored well against us. And keep in mind this unit still only has six games under its belt. Hell, last year's defense gave up 24+ points three times in the regular season and was abysmal in takeaways, yet we still some how consider it better than this year's. This year's defense has given up more than one TD in a game only once (two, at Iowa). We may not have the mega-stars like Hawk, Carpenter, and Whitner, but the "new" guys are making names for themselves just fine, and by the time The Game rolls around this unit--as a whole--may be even better than last year's.
 
Upvote 0
SanClementeBuck;629139; said:
Zurp: With great respect for your stimulating posts, I believe some team stats go along with championships, generally speaking. Mainly, a robust defense has almost always followed championships, especially in college ball. Before you lower the boom on my opinion, I concede, there are exceptions once in awhile:wink2:

I definitely agree. Except for your "stimulating posts" part. What the hell are you smoking?

I agree that you want your defense to kick some ass. 2002 saw the nation's top defense beat the nation's top offense. 2003 was similar (though, I REALLY don't want to get into a USC vs. Oklahoma vs. LSU discussion). 2004 and 2005, USC was just a kick-your-ass-up-and-down-the-field team, and Texas was the same in 2005. I agree with the cliche of "defense wins championships."

I was just trying to say that I don't get depressed or worried about the fact that Ohio State gave up infinity-billion yards to Northern Illinois, or that they were losing at halftime to Penn State and only had the game put away when they got 2 pick-6's at the end of the game. I didn't worry last year when Ohio State had a negative-4-trillion turnover margin. The defense is playing well enough to win the games. Maybe they have to look better against Michigan State in order to win that game. Maybe not. Maybe Michigan State will rush for 400 yards, pass for 350, and Ohio State will hold them to 15 points off 12 field goal attempts. Maybe Ohio State will get a total of 3 first downs and 75 total yards, and win the game 16-15.

In that case, I'd probably be a little frustrated for a couple of days. But I think I have the faith in the coaching staff that the team will still get the win the next week. After the next week, I'd have the same faith for the following week.

Also, just to send some mixed-signals, don't get me wrong, but I love to look at stats, too. I love that Ohio State is leading the nation in points-per-game average, and that the turnover margin has improved so dramatically. I'd also like to see more three-and-outs. But still, it's all in the final score, and all in the win-loss record, for me.
 
Upvote 0
Zurp said:
Maybe Michigan State will rush for 400 yards, pass for 350, and Ohio State will hold them to 15 points off 12 field goal attempts. Maybe Ohio State will get a total of 3 first downs and 75 total yards, and win the game 16-15.

Okay, I've seen some of your ridiculous posts and not said anything, but now you are just being ludicrous. There is NO WAY Sparty converts 5 of 12 field goal attempts. They'd make 3 at most. It would end up 16-9. Jeesh.
 
Upvote 0
Bucky Katt;629174; said:
Okay, I've seen some of your ridiculous posts and not said anything, but now you are just being ludicrous. There is NO WAY Sparty converts 5 of 12 field goal attempts. They'd make 3 at most. It would end up 16-9. Jeesh.

I was counting on some questionable officiating. I think there's going to be a new rule, for that game, specifically, that if 5 field goals in a row get blocked, it counts as 2 of those field goals being good.

NOW who's being ludicrous???
 
Upvote 0
Zurp;629294; said:
I was counting on some questionable officiating. I think there's going to be a new rule, for that game, specifically, that if 5 field goals in a row get blocked, it counts as 2 of those field goals being good.

NOW who's being ludicrous???

Good point. 16-15 it is.
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;629145; said:
We may not have the mega-stars like Hawk, Carpenter, and Whitner, but the "new" guys are making names for themselves just fine, and by the time The Game rolls around this unit--as a whole--may be even better than last year's.
I think this D will possibly be better by the time THE GAME rolls around, if that's possible. New stars are stepping into the positions that A.J., Carp and Whitner held last year (Lil Animal, Pitcock and Jenkins). This D reminds me more of the '02 squad with the front four leading the way. It's plain scary to think these kids have done this well this fast.
A few weeks ago I was worried about '07 being a bit of a "down" year, but with what we'll have coming back on D next season I'm thinking we'll be just fine.
 
Upvote 0
Bucks' stoppers
Print this | E-mail this | Comments on this article: 0

Posted: October 11, 2006
Tom Dienhart

Meet Jim Laurinaitis.

Go ahead, shake his hand. You need to know the name and his game. Here's why: Laurinaitis, a sophomore middle linebacker, is the heart of an Ohio State defense that is better -- much better -- than anyone dreamed it would be.


"He's a special player," Texas offensive coordinator Greg Davis says. "Lauri ... . How do you say his name again?"

It's Lore-in-EYE-tis. It rhymes with -- well, it doesn't really rhyme with anything. But it rolls off your tongue once you've mastered the pronunciation. Here, try it again: Lore-in-EYE-tis.

Ah, forget it. Just look for No. 33 the next time Ohio State plays. He's a 6-3, 244-pound focus of fury, the kind of player grizzled coaches say "plays like his hair is on fire."

Perfect.

Funny, isn't it? Most were forecasting imperfection for the defense in the preseason. Back in August, the skinny on the Buckeyes went something like this: "The offense is going to have to be as great as everyone thinks to cover for an iffy defense." A Lamborghini with a four-cylinder engine. More to the point: Tackle Quinn Pitcock and cornerback Malcolm Jenkins had star power, but Ohio State was replacing nine starters, including a group of linebackers that featured first-round draft picks A.J. Hawk and Bobby Carpenter.

But look at Ohio State now, towing a 6-0 record, a No. 1 ranking and a head of steam that has the Buckeyes on track for their second national championship in five years.

"When we looked at the Ohio State film, I was hoping we might see some weaknesses with all the great players who left," Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz says. "I don't mind telling you that I was a little skeptical over the summer when I kept hearing that everyone was picking Ohio State to be at the top of the heap in the country.

"It's amazing. For the quote, unquote inexperience on the defensive side, those guys are playing super football."

Through six games, Ohio State's defense has morphed from suspect to super. The numbers don't lie. The Buckeyes lead the Big Ten and rank first in the nation in scoring defense (9.3 ppg), the only defensive stat that matters. Ohio State's numbers figure to improve over the next five games, which we'll unkindly dub speed bumps, until a season-ending visit from Michigan.

"This is a different team than last year," Ohio State defensive coordinator Jim Heacock says. "We are getting the feel of what works and what doesn't work with this group. We have a comfortable front four and continue to make progress and play better each week."

Still skeptical? Well, remember this: Few -- if any -- teams have played two tougher road games than the Buckeyes, who have ventured to Texas and Iowa and won. But the Texas game served as the punch-in-the-face attention grabber for the Ohio State defense and Laurinaitis, who recorded 13 tackles, two forced fumbles and an interception.

A rehab project? Ridiculous.

"They are a carbon copy of last year," says Northern Illinois offensive coordinator John Bond, who got the first crack at Ohio State's defense this season.

"We had some success with screens into some of their zone pressures, but that was about all we did that worked consistently well. They swarm to the ball. They gang tackle."

And they're deep despite losing all of those starters, including six NFL draft picks -- safeties Donte Whitner and Nate Salley, linebacker Anthony Schlegel and cornerback Ashton Youboty, in addition to Hawk and Carpenter.

"It's interesting to have as many guys rotating on defense as we do," Laurinaitis says. "It also is comforting. Any time a team has a lot of depth, it fires up competition and makes everyone step it up in practice. But we have a lot of work to do to eliminate big plays and increase our confidence."

Another key to Ohio State's defensive prowess: The Buckeyes haven't plugged freshmen into many starting roles. Check out the line, which starts three seniors and a sophomore. That veteran savvy, led by Pitcock, has created a disruptive push that has buffered the most youthful aspect of the defense: the secondary.

No doubt: If you're looking for a weakness, stop here. Ohio State starts a redshirt freshman. And another starter (Anderson Russell) has been lost for the season because of a knee injury, which further muddles the picture. The Buckeyes have minimized their use of risky coverages because of the youth and are playing lots of zone. Ohio State has yielded a few big plays -- too many for Heacock's liking -- but this still is an aggressive, attacking defense. It just has to be more judicious than it was last season when it comes to punching the pedal.

And then there are the linebackers. The famed Hawk-Carpenter-Schlegel trio has been replaced by sophomore Marcus Freeman, fifth-year senior John Kerr and Laurinaitis, the team's leader in tackles and interceptions.

Laurinaitis is an animal. Well, not really, but he is the son of The Animal, who was half of the famed tag team pro wrestler duo known as the Road Warriors and later as the Legion of Doom. Come crying to Daddy with a skinned knee in this family and you'll likely get a folding chair across the back. So, given those bloodlines, it's no wonder Laurinaitis is doing what he's doing.

"He's smart," Ohio State coach Jim Tressel says. "He studies it. And he's committed physically. He's very instinctive, and I think he'll do nothing but keep getting better."

Just like the Ohio State defense.

Tom Dienhart is an associate editor for Sporting News. E-mail him at [email protected].

http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=137217
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top