This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
    Dismiss Notice

Ding from a wussie

Discussion in 'Open Discussion (Work-safe)' started by BuckeyeBeliever, Aug 10, 2004.

  1. surprise, surprise, they didn't sign, but they gave me a negative...

    this, because I though Sushi gave a very heart felt post on her beliefs...

    see post:
    http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?p=43727#post43727

    to the dinger, you are a wussie.

    come on, be strong, don't be a wimp, sign your posts sissy.
     
  2. redskinbucksfan

    redskinbucksfan The brownest of the brown liquors

    Crying about a negative comment on a message board isn't too manly either
     
  3. Buckeyeskickbuttocks

    Buckeyeskickbuttocks Z --> Z^2 + c Staff Member

    I think BB's correct - if you're going to ding someone for a post, you should have the balls to sign it. If you don't feel so upset about a post that you don't believe you need to sign your ding, then you shouldn't be dinging that person in the first place... Maybe BB and I are the only ones who take an anonymous opinion as little more than meaningless... Hell, even if you do sign it - in this medium, it's still anonymous, more or less.
     
  4. Oh8ch

    Oh8ch Cognoscente of Omphaloskepsis Staff Member

    No disrespect BB, but I gotta go with the 'swallow hard and be quiet' argument. Most of the negatives are anonymous and - while the merits of posting that way in general may merit debate (and it has been debated) - creating a thread to respond to each one only clutters the board.

    One enhancement I would like to see to rep posts is the ability to respond to the poster even though you don't know who it is (some sort of reply button on rep). Sometimes the negative is based on a simple misunderstanding of the intent of the original post. In any case it would probably make folks 'feel better' about getting zinged. Not that I consider it a big issue.
     
  5. gregorylee

    gregorylee I'd rather be napping!!

  6. RugbyBuck

    RugbyBuck Our church has no bells.

    Paragraph 1 - Agreed
    Paragraph 2 - Good idea; no clue whether it's doable, but a good idea
     
  7. OSUsushichic

    OSUsushichic Fired up! Ready to go! Staff Member

    BB,

    That's what you get for sticking up for me! :wink2:
     
  8. thanks Sushi :)

    Chivarly isn't dead.

    ouch, you cut me to the quick...

    yet another PC brave man(read wussie)

     
  9. redskinbucksfan

    redskinbucksfan The brownest of the brown liquors

    I always sign my reps, good or bad.
     
  10. Brutus1

    Brutus1 Don't be penurious, donate to the BP Spring Dr.

    If you don't like negative reps, whether signed or not, then don't frequent the political boards. Nothing divides a group like a political discussion.

    Stay on the Football board and you probably won't see a negative rep. I've learned to try staying away from the political boards, they just get everone pissed about something.

    If you comlain about a negative rep in a post, it's just asking for more. Just ignore them.
     
  11. luckobucko

    luckobucko Robust T

    This is the second thread I've seen you start to complain about getting dinged. Go ahead and ding away for this, but it seems like you care a bit too much about your reputation points...
     
  12. DEBuckeye

    DEBuckeye It ain't easy, bein' cheesy.

    Isn't "wussie" spelled with a Y? Like- Wussy?
     
  13. FKAGobucks877

    FKAGobucks877 The Most Power-Drunk

    v$20 says it's Tibor attempting to stir the pot again...
     
  14. luckobucko

    luckobucko Robust T

    Since it wasn't Tibor, I think FKA should surrender v$20 on general principle..
     
  15. FKAGobucks877

    FKAGobucks877 The Most Power-Drunk

    No way man. I meant the first ding...:biggrin: Besides, that was more of lame comedic shot over Tibor's bow than anything else.
     

Share This Page