• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Favorite Videos (youtube)

I didn't know where else to put this. This past Monday NPR in Columbus had a grammar expert on to discuss, well, grammar, and she was incorrectly opining on a few things so my friend and I let the trolling begin. He made a video of it:



Edit: It was actually only half a good troll. I didn't get through but called in to represent an opposing faction that believed instead that "noin't" should be used as an appropriate form of "yes."
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
I didn't know where else to put this. This past Monday NPR in Columbus had a grammar expert on to discuss, well, grammar, and she was incorrectly opining on a few things so my friend and I let the trolling begin. He made a video of it:



Edit: It was actually only half a good troll. I didn't get through but called in to represent an opposing faction that believed instead that "noin't" should be used as an appropriate form of "yes."


So they talk about no being much simpler, then go on to over complicate...

First, it’s already spelled once. Y E S N ‘ T

Woman: “Is it yesn’t with an S or yesn’t with a Z?”

Other woman: “Y E S, as in Sam, N ‘ T.”

So woman 1 is wondering if it is an S or Z. Woman 2 spells it and needs to say S, as in Sam, as if “S and Z” even remotely sound the same. Or she could have just answered “with an S.”

“Smart”
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top