• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Game Thread Game Eight: #1 Ohio State 44, Indiana 3 (10/21/06)

R0CK3TM4NN;634625; said:
I won't be able to watch this game....anywhere...

:(

I'll take some pictures for you.

With Indiana winning two in a row, one of them over a respected Iowa team, all of a sudden this game can't be overlooked.

While Iowa losing doesn't help our SOS, it does serve notice to the Buckeyes that they should be ready to play ball on Saturday. Tressel will be able to show the team that Indiana means business and they are playing inspired football right now. Built in motivation.
 
Upvote 0
This game could be much more competitive than the msu game. A healthy, mobile and relatively unknown QB and a very talented receiver. These guys are definitely on a high right now after beating Iowa and will absolutely believe they can compete with the Buckeyes. Should be a good game to watch.
 
Upvote 0
scooter1369;634627; said:
While Iowa losing doesn't help our SOS, it does serve notice to the Buckeyes that they should be ready to play ball on Saturday.

Seeing as we play both Iowa and Indiana, the result of the Iowa/Indiana game was moot...we we lost in Iowa's lowered power ranking we gain back in Indiana's increased power ranking.
 
Upvote 0
I am not worried. It is good that Indiana is not going to be as much of a pushover as originally thought. I think we will drop them soundly.

I watched part of the Iowa - Indiana clash. It seemed pretty clear that Iowa was gutted by the loss to Ohio State. They walked out on that field and thought they would take us. But as we all know, get into Drew Tate's head and you own them. We did it. Indiana did it.

Iowa lost to us. They appeared to give up against Indiana. They were thinking that they should be killing Indiana. Tate was being Tate and then Iowa was being Tate. You could see that somewhere there, they just stopped believing in themselves.

To me, there is a real lesson here for football coaches at the college level.

Right temperament, right skills: Troy Smith, a winner
Wrong temperament, wrong skills: You name the loser

In both cases, it is very easy for a coach to know what to do.

The confusing case is what to do when you have a player who shows signs of

Wrong temperament, right skills: Drew Tate

This always is played out in terms such as, "he just wants to win so badly", and you can see it clearly in a high school player. In former times, these players were kept and nurtured.

It may simply be that many players just can't learn how to manage their emotions and exhibit the right temperament and that college coaches need to realize that a player like Tate is a cancer. We've lost a few players during the Tressel-era who appear to have had the right skills but the wrong temperament and Tressel seems to be a master at managing his teams for temperament.

On the other hand, perhaps that's a difference between Tressel and Ferentz. A low social-IQ player like Tate doesn't lead but rather saps the spirit of a team by providing the opposite of leadership: self-absorption and self-abuse. Rather bench him and put someone out there who may have less skill, but who can lead the team.

Iowa should have beat Indiana soundly. We will.


Edit: For a good, if somewhat long, read on this topic, see Goleman's new book Social Intelligence. To you guys in coaching, I think this should be required reading.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Iowa couldn't hang with us...Indiana played it's heart out to barely nip Iowa. Indiana would have to play BETTER than they did against Iowa, and we would have to play our worst game of the year, for this game to even be close in the fourth quarter. And if...BY SOME CRAZY MIRACLE...it is close in the fourth quarter...the fact that we are so deep and conditioned, will take over. Iowa was looking past Indiana to Michigan. Frankly, we could afford to do that, because we could score enough points in one quarter to beat Indiana. Honestly, if we lose this game...or any game up until THE GAME...then i'll be ashamed.

I'm thinking we probably come out flat and don't bring our A game and win somewhere around 38-10.

I'd like to see Chris Wells get over 100 yards rushing...limit Pittmans carries if you don't need him, and just stay injury free.
 
Upvote 0
We own Indiana like few other teams own another. Check this out:
  • Since going 0-5-1 against Indiana in our first six games, we are an amazing 64-7-4 against them.
  • Aside from a two-game skid in '87 and '88 (when they had two of their best teams ever and we had a couple mediocre teams), we haven't lost to them since 1951.
  • Our record against them after 1951 is a mind-boggling 44-2-2, including a 30-0-1 stretch 1952-1986.
You think there's a possibility that they can stay within four TDs on our field? I don't fucking think so...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Link

Hoosiers now have real shot at bowl

After upset of Iowa, IU needs two wins

By Steve Warden

The Journal Gazette

Ohio_State_10-16-2006_GD8421A.jpg

indiana_helmets_10-16-2006_NC7MVFS.jpg


Don?t look now, but?aw, what the heck. Look now.
Look at the Big Ten standings this morning. Look at where Indiana, sits among its peers after its heart-thumping, heart-warming, can-you-believe-it 31-28 upset victory Saturday over 15th-ranked Iowa at Memorial Stadium in Bloomington.
No, no, the Hoosiers aren?t at the top of the standings. That?s pie in the sky. But they?re not at the bottom, either.
Now look at the record: 4-3. The same team was 2-3 two weeks ago and going nowhere. Now it?s 4-3 and going ? dare we say? ? aw, go ahead and say it ? a (shhh) bowl game?
For those Indiana fans who may not be familiar with the term ?bowl game,? it is an ?extra? football game played in December or January, usually in a warm climate, against a similarly talented team from another large conference. Mostly it?s a reward for the players for a season well done.
Two more wins, and Indiana becomes eligible to play in such a bowl game. And this is where the eyes get a little buggy looking at the Big Ten standings.
Two of IU?s remaining five opponents have worse records. Michigan State is a free-falling 3-4, and Minnesota is 2-5 and winless in the league after four weeks. The Hoosiers play Michigan State in two weeks, after they face No. 1-ranked Ohio State, and then IU travels to Minnesota Nov. 4. The regular season closes against Michigan and at Purdue.
Indiana hasn?t been to a bowl game since the 1993 Independence Bowl, where it lost to Virginia Tech 45-20.
?We finally got the chemistry down we?ve been waiting on,? IU receiver James Hardy of Fort Wayne Elmhurst said after his 104-yard, three-touchdown performance.
?Physically, it?s the same guys,? IU coach Terry Hoeppner said. ?But this is such an emotional game and a mental game, also. I think our last three weeks of preparation seemed to be whipped out in the Wisconsin game, but it?s how you repond.
?This team has really come together and if I could pinpoint anything, it?s the attitude that they have about themselves, No. 1, and about each other.?
Getting ready for Ohio State
If you thought that Ohio State (7-0) was going to sleepwalk through its preparations for Indiana, the Hoosiers made the Buckeyes at least sit up and take notice. Going into Ohio Stadium on Saturday is a tall task for any team, much less one that hasn?t won in Columbus since 1987. But Ohio State wasn?t the No. 1 team in the land then, either.
Hoeppner said he challenged his team to change its attitude after a 52-17 loss to Wisconsin, and it worked against Illinois. He challenged it again, and it worked against Iowa. ?It worked last week, so I tried it again this week, and it worked again this week, so I?ll probably use it again next week,? he said.
Hoosier hits
After three cracks at beating Iowa when he was with Miami (Ohio), Hoeppner at last beat the Hawkeyes. And he had someone to share the good news with. In the final seconds of Saturday?s game, Hoeppner was handed a cell phone. It was former Miami quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, who said, ?We finally beat Iowa.? Said Hoeppner: ?Ben and I could never get it done ? Iowa came in as the least-penalized team in the Big Ten, but had seven penalties for 80 yards against IU, including a personal foul that ended a fourth-quarter Iowa drive ? Hardy would like to play Iowa every week. In his two career games against the Hawkeyes he has 20 receptions for 307 and four touchdowns. ?With Hardy, it starts with his (6-feet-7) size ? he?s not just a big guy, he?s a good football player. He has good ball skills and competes for the football. We are 0 for 2 with him, year to year,? Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz said.
[email protected]
Indiana at Ohio State
When: Noon,
Saturday
TV: ESPNU
Radio: 93.3 FM
 
Upvote 0
Link

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]LONG DROUGHT: No. 1 Ohio State?s next opponent, Indiana this Saturday at Ohio Stadium, got its first win over a top 15 team in 19 years when it beat Iowa 31-28 on Saturday.
The last time Indiana beat a top 15 team was Oct. 10, 1987, when it won 31-10 over Ohio State.
[/FONT]
 
Upvote 0
JT won't let the boys run up the score. 50 points? No way.
Maybe 40, but I doubt even that.
Question is will the Hoosiers have any gas left in the tank after expending so much energy in beating Iowa?
I think they are motivated and a solid team.
 
Upvote 0
Taosman;634872; said:
I think they are motivated and a solid team.
I'll give you a thumbs up on the first part of that statement and beg to differ on the second. They played over their abilities while Iowa played below theirs this Saturday.
Motivated yes, solid? Not sold on that.
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;634814; said:
Since going 0-5-1 against Indiana in our first five games, we are an amazing 64-7-4 against them.

Ohio State had 5 losses and 1 tie in 5 games? I'm guessing there's a typo in there. Is it 4 losses, 1 tie in 5 games? Or 5 losses, 0 ties in 5 games? Or 5 losses, 1 tie in 6 games?

(It makes a big difference in whether I bet the farm on Ohio State to cover.)

I agree, though. Indiana will be down 4+ touchdowns before they score a point. And, yes, they will score. It will likely be against Ohio State's back-ups, like Michigan State scored.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top