• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Giovanni Strassini: A Football Fantasy

Clarity;2340769; said:
It's time to reel these threads in. It's a simple question of reason and productivity. They lack both.
But ... but ...

this-thread-delivers_dhl.jpg
 
Upvote 0
NYG21254246;2340776; said:
If any one of us were victimized by identity theft, like the Strasshole here claims he was; would you be passive by allowing it to go to trial, risk a conviction, and it going on your record, before trying to wipe it off your record?

OR

Would you alert the authorities immediately? Followed by anyone that could be affected (eg- personal/business financial institutions, personal/business credit card companies, cell phone company, business clients, family members, etc).

From what I have seen here, this guy:
1. Did not alert his business banking institution and credit card company, as he had to go to trial.
2. Unknown if he alerted his personal banking institution and credit card company.
3. Unknown if he alerted his business clients.
4. Did not alert his family members (since it seems like his former spouse left him).
5. Did not change his phone number, as the phone number that HE GAVE ME puts him as the perpetrator of the crimes.

As for the Strasshole being a victim of identity theft, I have one word to sum that up. BULL[Mark May]!!!!!

Polly purebred once again you cite 0 reality from known instances. all the pertinent institutions were notified by my attorney including the North Carolina Attorney General and the FTC. you continue on with your wrongful claims and prove that you're the obsessive one because all I have done is reply to you and your attacks.
 
Upvote 0
onlymelol;2340779; said:
Polly purebred once again you cite 0 reality from known instances. all the pertinent institutions were notified by my attorney including the North Carolina Attorney General and the FTC. you continue on with your wrongful claims and prove that you're the obsessive one because all I have done is reply to you and your attacks.

If he was wrongfully convicted, how come I am unable to find whether or not you were able to re-coup any legal fees? Lost wages? Pain and suffering? If your conviction that got sealed is publicly available, then anything that you were able to re-coup would be publicly available as well.
 
Upvote 0
Let John go. Dead man walking is just his favorite position. It involves him dressing up as Susan Sarandon, a nun outfit, and well, I don't think people want to hear more. He learned it while in prison.

Anyway John, I told you I am not into that. Yet if you want to meet, I am easy to find. I often hang out in the basement of the Alamo.
 
Upvote 0
You keep saying you are "done" and yet you continue to recite the same nonsensical gibberish. Please, just stop posting here already. You are not going to convince anyone here of anything without providing proof. If you do not intend to do so, continuing to plague this website with your pidgin-speak does nothing more than waste your time, as well as the time of everyone else here. It is completely non-productive. Just stop.
 
Upvote 0
NYG21254246;2340785; said:
If he was wrongfully convicted, how come I am unable to find whether or not you were able to re-coup any legal fees? Lost wages? Pain and suffering? If your conviction that got sealed is publicly available, then anything that you were able to re-coup would be publicly available as well.

wrong. learn before you spout wrongful info. nothing is made public as in the net unless you do not request privacy. some things are not readily available, as in ID theft claims, to protect the injured party. obsessive and continually posting bad or wrongful info. =paulie purebread. you just cannot stop, and i am replying.
 
Upvote 0
Bucky Katt;2340788; said:
You keep saying you are "done" and yet you continue to recite the same nonsensical gibberish. Please, just stop posting here already. You are not going to convince anyone here of anything without providing proof. If you do not intend to do so, continuing to plague this website with your pidgin-speak does nothing more than waste your time, as well as the time of everyone else here. It is completely non-productive. Just stop.

why do you feel the need to say anything more here? read and practice the rules before you castigate me for it. when i see NEW wrongful stuff, i defend, it is my nature. if you are attacked wrongly, what do you do?
 
Upvote 0
The only reason you would go to court in order to determine identity theft is if your name is in an arrest warrant or criminal conviction.

If that guy truly used your name and that is why it is in a court record, the records would be changed to use his actual name but still include your name as an alias. If his name is not known, it would be changed to John Doe.

These records would not be sealed. The only thing that would happen is any thing like your social security number, bank statements, etc. would be redacted.

So, are you saying the stuff with John Strassini was due to identity theft. If so, why are the above not true? Also, if you have not noticed, if you do a request for Giovanni Strassini's court records in North Carolina, the alias "John D Strassini" is tied to your name (that is your alias, not the other way around). I would get to work on changing that if I were you. Well, unless it's true.

Oh, BTW, if you truly had this done you should have received a court document saying that you are indeed not the person who has been convicted or wanted on a warrant. This should not have any personal information other than what is already known here, and you could easily black out anything you don't want seen. You could easily provide this here, but as you have stated over and over again, you do refuse to do so. Just because one person didn't want it does not prove you actually have it.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top