This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
    Dismiss Notice

If you could guarantee one commit from the following, who would it be?

Discussion in 'Poll' started by Clarity, Jun 26, 2004.

?

If you could guarantee one commit from the following, who would it be?

  1. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1876">Alaeze, M. (DE, MD)</a>

    0.8%
  2. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2035">Bemoll, K. (OL, CA)</a>

    6.3%
  3. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1697">Bright, C. (DL, PA)</a>

    0.8%
  4. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showpost.php?p=10186&postcount=10">Cushing, B. (LB, NJ)<

    0.8%
  5. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=634&page=1&pp=15">Doering, D. (OL, IL)<

    12.6%
  6. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=641">King, J. (CB, PA)</a>

    5.9%
  7. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=692">Lymon, S. (WR, IN)</a>

    0.8%
  8. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1274">McCoy, R. (LB, MD)</a>

    1.3%
  9. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=595">Myers-White, A. (S, OH)</a>

    10.1%
  10. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1729">Oatis, S. (S, CA)</a>

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  11. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1998">Sanchez, M. (QB, CA)</a>

    17.6%
  12. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1814">Simpson, M. (RB, PA)</a>

    0.8%
  13. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=608">Wells, M. (RB, FL)</a>

    36.6%
  14. <a href="http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=608">Williams, D. (WR, MD)</a>

    5.5%
  1. Clarity

    Clarity Will Bryant Staff Member

    If you could guarantee one commit from the following, who would it be?
     
  2. jlb1705

    jlb1705 hipster doofus Staff Member Bookie

    No Ringer? That would be my pick. I guess that would require interest on OSU's part, though.
     
  3. Clarity

    Clarity Will Bryant Staff Member

  4. MililaniBuckeye

    MililaniBuckeye The satanic soulless freight train that is Ohio St Staff Member Tech Admin

    For now, I'd go with Sanchez. My reasoning is that no other single player makes as much of an impact on a team as much as a QB does. Zwick and Smith will have no more than two years with Sanchez on the roster, and if Sanchez red-shirts, he'd be a red-shirt sophomore when Zwick and Smith graduates. He'd either be our starter or the backup for Boeckman, and as such will be very important. We have a ton of talent in our secondary, so while getting a great safety or corner is always a big plus, we could get by without another 4- or 5-star DB (seeing as we already have O'Neal). I would say our second biggest overall need is OL, but we already have the top two OL in the state (one of them being the #4 OL in the country and a 5-star prospect), so missing out on another top-flight OL is manageable. We're pretty set at DL and LB for the next few years, so it's not a huge need right now. I reserve the right to change my mind later (even if I do cast an "official" vote after I submit this post).
     
  5. BuckNutty

    BuckNutty Hear The Drummer Get Wicked Staff Member Bookie

    I almost went with Doering but in the end I picked Sanchez. Not only is he a highly skilled quarterback that plays the most important position on the field, he also could change the national perception of our offense. Sanchez has a good arm, makes good decisions will the ball, has great mechanics already and is an excellent athlete who can get first downs with his feet. If he were to come to Columbus and play well it would attract top receivers from around the country and future quarterbacks who would no longer be scared to play in our offense. Hopefully Zwick, Smith or Boeckman can change that perception. Unfortunately I think we have a less than 50/50 shot at Sanchez. Prove me wrong, Mark!
     
  6. LordJeffBuck

    LordJeffBuck Illuminatus Emeritus Staff Member

    You're right about QB's, but defense wins championships, and I'll take a QB killer - Melvin Alaeze, the next Will Smith (if he comes to OSU, that is).

    Sanchez would be my no. 2 selection.
     
  7. MililaniBuckeye

    MililaniBuckeye The satanic soulless freight train that is Ohio St Staff Member Tech Admin

    You're right about QB's, but defense wins championships

    True, but no one person on defense can make the difference to the degree the QB can on offense. We've seen what a mediocre QB (Bellisari) can do to a season. Krenzel wasn't super-talented physically but made good decisions on a consistant basis. If we can get a kid that has both physical and mental talent, then he can make a huge difference. Thus I'd take Sanchez. My #2 pick would be a defensive player, most likely Alaeze.
     
  8. BuckNutty

    BuckNutty Hear The Drummer Get Wicked Staff Member Bookie

    Bingo!
     
  9. wdg01

    wdg01 Freshman

    Except for the occasional star RB :nerd:

    Give me MoW any day
     
  10. LordJeffBuck

    LordJeffBuck Illuminatus Emeritus Staff Member

    The NFL values QB's, DL's, and RB's as impact players. Below is a breakdown of all first and second overall picks (by position) in the NFL and AFL drafts since 1961:

    QB: 27 (17 no. 1; 10 no. 2)
    DL: 23 (13 no. 1; 10 no. 2)
    RB: 19 (11 no. 1; 8 no. 2)
    OL: 14 (but only 3 no. 1 overall)
    LB: 9
    WR: 7
    DB: 1

    I chose 1961 as the beginning of the modern era of NFL football, as that was the year that the pass-oriented AFL began play.

    Looks like an argument can be made to support all of our choices.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2004
  11. osugrad21

    osugrad21 Capo Regime Staff Member

    I took Wells after considering both Doering and Sanchez. Wells' burst is rare, I just envision him doing great things as a Buckeye. Doering and Boone as bookends was very tempting as was a polished HS QB like Sanchez, but I am still intrigued by Wells.
     
  12. The KSB

    The KSB 4-4-11/11-5-11

    After a great deal of deliberation I took Sanchez. I almost went with AMW, Wells, or D. Williams
     
  13. MililaniBuckeye

    MililaniBuckeye The satanic soulless freight train that is Ohio St Staff Member Tech Admin

    wdg01: Except for the occasional star RB

    I'd debate that point if you weren't so correct...
     
  14. stxbuck

    stxbuck Woody wore Sambas

    I'd take Derrick Williams-this guy is supposed to be the next Peter Warrick, Santonio Holmes,etc. That's the kind of playmaker I want at WR. I would not pick Wells or AMW because I have a good feeling about both of those guys committing, whereas Williams is venturing into pipe-dream territory as far as a commit goes.
    2nd place would be Bright-all great D's begin w/ monster DTs.
     
  15. sears3820

    sears3820 Sitting around in my underwear.... Staff Member

    After much deliberation, I had to take Dan Doering.

    We have some lovely parting gifts for Maurice Wells & Mark Sanchez.
     

Share This Page