• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Game Thread Ohio State 33, Washington 14 (Final)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
How many times during Tressel's first four years was OSU capable of lighting up the scoreboard? Tressel had the horses last year, and rode them hard in many games with scoring margins of 23, 30, 21, 31, 41, 44, and 44.
 
Upvote 0
Taosman;847760; said:
No Heisman QB and All American WRs means a much less explosive offense.
Click to expand...

Two WRs that are 90% of what we just lost to the draft and a possibly improved running game, coupled with a defense that should be stringer than last year's, should calm the worriers down somewhat...
 
Upvote 0
Taosman;848659; said:
I don't see 2 WRs that are "90%" of Ted Ginn and Gonzo.

Robo , Small and Hartline will be good....just not 90% good as the 2 mentioned.
Click to expand...

Robo is 90% of Ginn, no doubt. He's actually a better route runner and just as good a ball-catcher...he just doesn't have that unworldly Ginn speed. And I would put Hartline at 90% of Gonzo...85% at worst.

You act like we have some sort of huge drop off in talent at WR with the departures of Ginn and Gonzo, and we don't.
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;848682; said:
Robo is 90% of Ginn, no doubt. He's actually a better route runner and just as good a ball-catcher...he just doesn't have that unworldly Ginn speed.
Click to expand...

Well isnt that kinda what made Ginn special? I definately like Robo though, he just seems to be in the right place at the right time (PSU on the long play, and then the long play against Michigan where Hall went diving over Robiskie's back).
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;848795; said:
And that's why I rate Robo at around 90% of Ginn. Just think if Robo had Ginn's speed...
Click to expand...


Robo, to me, is more like a Jenkins clone, big physical receiver with decent speed.

Ginn just terrified people, and backed it up by blowing by some of the best DBs in college football.

And Hartline doesn't equal Gonzo.

Small, hasn't done much, yet.

90%? Naaa! More like 75-80%
Good, but not 90% of Ginn and Gonzo!
 
Upvote 0
OmahaBeef;847729; said:
To play the devil's advocate here, couldn't you argue that the past two seasons had more to do with having an explosive play maker at QB?
Click to expand...

MililaniBuckeye;847748; said:
Not at all. I've been saying since my Bucknuts days back when Tressel was first hired that he goes with his strengths. If he has a dynamic QB with great WRs, he'll use them...and he showed that these past two season despite having solid NFL-level workhorse RB (Pittman). If he was truly as conservative as many insist on pegging him to be, would we have rolled up 617 yards against Notre Dame or 42 points against Michigan? Now, if JT could have his choice of having 300 yards a game on the ground or 300 yards in the air every game, he'll take the ground every time, and not necessarily because he's "conservative" but rather for ball control and dominance of possession.
Click to expand...


Mili, I understand what you are saying, but I think your answer feeds right into Omaha's question. Not to label JT as conservative, rather like you said, he will play to his strengths. The last 2 years his strengths were that he had an eventual Heisman QB, among many other weapons, namely 2 first-round WR's to throw to, and a not-too-shabby NFL caliber 4th round RB. I think this year we will return to a more conservative approach, due to the inexperience at the QB position. So to say that the past 2 seasons had nothing at all to do with Smith at QB, I think you have answered both ways.
 
Upvote 0
God only knows how much I hope and pray they equal "90%" of Ginn and Gonzo. Do I think they could prove to be that good, sure. Do I think there is NO WAY you can make that claim at this point, yes. They haven't been the focal point of opposing secondary yet nor do they have a Heisman winner throwing the ball. Robo hasn't shown he is 90% of a Top 10 pick IMO nor has Hartline shown me he's 90% of a 1st Round Draft Pick.
 
Upvote 0
OSUBuckeye4Life;848872; said:
God only knows how much I hope and pray they equal "90%" of Ginn and Gonzo. Do I think they could prove to be that good, sure. Do I think there is NO WAY you can make that claim at this point, yes. They haven't been the focal point of opposing secondary yet nor do they have a Heisman winner throwing the ball. Robo hasn't shown he is 90% of a Top 10 pick IMO nor has Hartline shown me he's 90% of a 1st Round Draft Pick.
Click to expand...

Point-by-point:

1. Yes, I can claim Robo is 90% of Ginn because he is a better WR yet not as fast. In fact, if Ginn wasn't so damn fast I could easily claim that Robo's route-running and pass-catching negates Ginn's speed.

2. Yes, I can claim Hartline is 90% (maybe 85%) of Gonzo. Hartline has superb speed like Gonzo, and like Ginzo had a knack for finding the opening when he was in. He also made some tough catches. He doesn't quite have Gonzo's unreal cutting ability (at least not that I saw), but he's not as much of a dropoff as many think.

3. Just because neither has "shown" you they aren't 10% of Ginn or Gonzo doesn't mean they aren't. And, the fact that many teams (as do many of BP members) expect us to run more this year because of Beanie and us having a new QB, that will in turn open up the passing game (and thus giving Robo and Hartline more area) whereas last year everyone in the solar system was expecting us to air it out and had schemed to slow it down.
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;848890; said:
Point-by-point:

1. Yes, I can claim Robo is 90% of Ginn because he is a better WR yet not as fast. In fact, if Ginn wasn't so damn fast I could easily claim that Robo's route-running and pass-catching negates Ginn's speed.

2. Yes, I can claim Hartline is 90% (maybe 85%) of Gonzo. Hartline has superb speed like Gonzo, and like Ginzo had a knack for finding the opening when he was in. He also made some tough catches. He doesn't quite have Gonzo's unreal cutting ability (at least not that I saw), but he's not as much of a dropoff as many think.

3. Just because neither has "shown" you they aren't 10% of Ginn or Gonzo doesn't mean they aren't. And, the fact that many teams (as do many of BP members) expect us to run more this year because of Beanie and us having a new QB, that will in turn open up the passing game (and thus giving Robo and Hartline more area) whereas last year everyone in the solar system was expecting us to air it out and had schemed to slow it down.
Click to expand...

#1) Yes, he may have shown in those areas he is superior to Ginn, but he still hasn't done it as a #1 WR.

#2) See point #1 but replace #1 with #2.

#3) I'm aware it works both ways, but think that you using 10% to make that point is you being a bit of a smartass (but then again you wouldn't be Milli would you? :wink: ). It's REASONABLE to assume they'll be better than 10%, whereas it's not nearly as resonable for the 90% figure to be tossed around. I also dont think the passing game is going to be much better for our WR's for two key reasons. One, yes when we lined up in a 5 WR set they knew it was pass but most teams also dont have the depth to stick a quality guy on Robo or Hartline (last year). Both situations (this year and last year) should prove to have benefits for the WR's. I'm sure we both also know the benefit of having a Heisman winner back there as well.

Lastly though, I want to stress I dont think they CAN'T, I just think that any talk in the summer of them being 90% of a tandem that both went in the 1st Round is a bit much.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
OSUBuckeye4Life;849147; said:
#1) Yes, he may have shown in those areas he is superior to Ginn, but he still hasn't done it as a #1 WR.

#2) See point #1 but replace #1 with #2.

#3) I'm aware it works both ways, but think that you using 10% to make that point is you being a bit of a smartass (but then again you wouldn't be Milli would you? :wink:.
Click to expand...

1). Just how does his not playing in the "#1 WR" position (please tell me on the field where that is) effect his abilities? He's going to run the same routes and make the same cuts regardless if he's the primary WR in the route/coverage or the #3 guy.

2.) Huh?

3.) No, I actually think that Robo/Hartline are 90% or so as good as Ginn/Gonzo...
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top