• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

PS3 NCAA 2011 DYNASTY ***PLANNING THREAD***

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
Buckeneye;1714960; said:
Basically, I'll toss my hat into this ring. I believe I was Minny last go around, I wouldn't mind a different school though :biggrin:
Click to expand...

The good part about being a part of the planning and the start-up, alot more options about what team you can pick :wink2:
 
Upvote 0
Whobebubba3;1715341; said:
I plan on doing this one again, will probably continue to stay out of the super league, I only got time for one dynasty....

As far as teams go....what about trying to put together the "New" Big10.........

Do a random draw for teams, or something, I don't care
Click to expand...

Really like this idea. Didnt fanatic come up with a randomizer script a few years ago?
 
Upvote 0
Now that everyone has been playing the demo, time to get deep into discussion here.

Seems like only 3 guys (from the old dynasty) so far want to build their previous teams via teambuilder.

I am tempted to say we should all start fresh. Especially since this year we had people drop and then come back and who knows how the teambuilder teams will come over. Since I would assume the team builder teams might really kick ass and then the new people picking would have to pick very good teams to compete and it turns into a super conference dynasty all over again.

But that leads to the next question. Do we prefer everyone in the same conference, or spread out in different conferences?

Another thought, maybe the guys that want to build their previous team in teambuilder might be able to do that in a 2nd dynasty?

Fire away guys... we have about a month to get things together.
 
Upvote 0
What about 2-Super Conferences......

5 per Conference. Make sure conferences have CCG. That way we sortof have a +1 format (as long as both winners make NCG).

Try to have 3-4 conference human games (depending on divisions 2/3 per division) and have 1 non-conference human game for those who only have 3 conference games.

This would make 4 human opponents per regular season. National/Dynasty Champ would have 6 human opponents (ideally).

This would also allow for us to use non-conference games to beat CPU teams that might ruin our master plan (again ideally.....)
 
Upvote 0
Whobebubba3;1718609; said:
What about 2-Super Conferences......

5 per Conference. Make sure conferences have CCG. That way we sortof have a +1 format (as long as both winners make NCG).

Try to have 3-4 conference human games (depending on divisions 2/3 per division) and have 1 non-conference human game for those who only have 3 conference games.

This would make 4 human opponents per regular season. National/Dynasty Champ would have 6 human opponents (ideally).

This would also allow for us to use non-conference games to beat CPU teams that might ruin our master plan (again ideally.....)
Click to expand...

Interesting thought... we can use the Big 10 & SEC conferences to give us as many Bowl Tie-ins as possible for human bowl matchups...
 
Upvote 0
Whobebubba3;1718700; said:
Are we going to cap a teams overall rating (such as 85) or do they still even do that???
Click to expand...

That will be up for discussion. (I think last year they did grades versus numerical) But once a list of all team ratings pop up somewhere, it will be easier to see the breakdown and what makes sense.
 
Upvote 0
I had the most fun last year playing as Temple. That might have been because everybody was still learning how to play this game online so we were all somewhat equal.....but I'd be willing to join an everybody sucks league as a 2nd option.
 
Upvote 0
im ok with people doing the team builder if they want

But if they do, the team selection rating cap for those who dont want to do it should be set at whatever the highest rated team builder team is, IMO
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top