• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

SEC (It just means more.. even its losses are wins)

Miles truly was “The Gambler”.

Ed is almost comically dumber.

Ed O sure ain't SMART

giphy.gif
 
Upvote 0
I’m not sure what’s funnier.

That you somehow have UGA on the same level as Bama.

or that you call LSU your “little sibling”
since turn of the century:
LSU leads the head to head 6-4 (3-1 in SEC CG)
LSU has more SEC titles 5-3
LSU has more National Titles 3-0

or if you want to go all-time
LSU leads head to head 18-13-1
LSU has more conference championships 16-15
LSU has more national championships 4-2


ooooh, i forgot.
UGA is number one in a poll the first week of November.
PRINT THE CUPS!!!

Any rodent-brained nitwit can cherry pick random stats out of a vacuum of information and twist it to try to fit their narrative.

As it was proven by another UGA poster, you have been caught misrepresenting the truth, presenting ardently false data (such as Kirby's combined record vs LLLLLsu & fLLLLLorida) to try to keep up with the Big Dawg since the current state of your football program is so pathetically anemic that you have nothing other to resort to other than fabricating facts to support your fictional narrative.

I’m not sure what’s funnier.

that you call LSU your “little sibling”

You are misconstruing my statement to misrepresent what I actually said. I never said that LLLLLsu is UGA's little sibling. We don't play frequently enough for that to be the case (though if we did, you would be).

Nor was I referring to Eddie O's unauthorized "Bayou Bengals Big Brothers Big Sisters of LLLLLouisiana" program with players mentoring his stripper baby mommas' children on how to run half-assed routes and miss tackles in practices.

What I actually said was that, like Auburn, LLLLLsu operates and behaves like a "little sibling" program (Specifically to Bama, as both LLLLLsu and Auburn are Bama's little siblings). In particular, they both have losing records all-time against Bama.

Georgia, unlike LLLLLsu, has winning all-time records against their significant rivals.

Here is Georgia's records against their main rivals:
- Auburn 62-56-8
- Clemsux 43-18-4
- fLLLLLorida 53-44-2
- North Ave Nerds 68-41-5
- Shamecocks 53-19-2
- Tennessee 25-23-2

As you can see, Georgia has a winning all-time record against ALL of their rivals. Thus we are the big brother of the mall.

Whereas LLLLLsu, on the other hand, has losing records against their significant rivals:
- aLabama 26-55-5 (LOL!)
- fLLLLLorida 32-33-3 (LMAO!)
- And no, you don't get any credit for winning records vs the Mississippi schools, Arky, and Tulane. Those are joke schools, and would be like Georgia counting Vandy as a significant rival.

I couldn't imagine what it would be like to have a losing record to any rival, much less a main rival. No elite program would have a losing all-time record against their rivals, and especially not to two of them!

LSU....more like LOLSU!!!!!!
I’m not sure what’s funnier.


That you somehow have UGA on the same level as Bama.

Again, instead of resorting to conjecture and speculation, I shall present straight DATA that illustrates this irrefutable, objective verity.

First, according to 247, Georgia and Alabama are neck to neck in team talent composite in 2021.

https://247sports.com/Season/2021-Football/CollegeTeamTalentComposite/

Alabama is at a team talent composite of 1,001.89, while Georgia is a sliver behind them at 1,001.79, a .1 difference in talent composite (perhaps J. Williams transfering tipped the scales a bit in Bama's favor).

Yet, in spite of this .1 discrepancy in total talent composites, Georgia is far out-performing Alabama on the field with undefeated Georgia dominating every week, and one-loss Alabama struggling to win against against bottom-feeder programs like LLLLLsu & fLLLLLorida. Why?

This is because Georgia has 5 more 5-stars than Alabama (19 vs 14), thus the moniker "5 Star U" is more appropriate for Georgia than Bama.

This is not a one-year phenomena, rather it is the result of several years of Kirby dominating on the trail, even eating Saban's lunch with regards to 5 star prospects.

See chart below:

screen-shot-2021-10-30-at-40756-pm.webp


In fact, not only would I say that Georgia is on Bama's level, but if this trend of out acquiring 5 star talent at rate of 3.1% over a 5 year period, it is safe to say that within the next few years, Bama is going to be Georgia's little sibling.

But I digress.

In conclusion, your petty objection towards my claims that LLLLLSU is "Little Sibling U" and that Georgia and Bama are on the same level has been scientifically disproven with stats and evidence.

CASE CLOSED.
 
Upvote 0
It's also worth noting that LLLLLSU is in 5th place in total total composite and the number of 5 stars acquired. They are also a 5 win team two years in a row.

If UGA is "5 Star U" then L5U is "5th place/5 Win U"!!!
Rivals, rivals? Who has rival(s)? We only have A rival. Just one.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top