This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
    Dismiss Notice

The 2002 recruiting class has been great in every way except...

Discussion in 'Buckeye Football' started by tibor75, Oct 3, 2004.

  1. tibor75

    tibor75 Banned

  2. bucknut74

    bucknut74 You Enjoy Myself

    Com'on tibor, at least be fair. Those are some might impressive GPA numbers.. They might not be able to block, but they sure as hell know their quadratic equations..
  3. OSUBasketballJunkie

    OSUBasketballJunkie Never Forget 31-0

    first I would say that there time at OSU is not finished and alot can happen during a 12 game schedule..........
  4. KillerNut

    KillerNut Banned

    I personally think what other people on the radio and other media outlets say, which is that it is technique. Jim Bollman should have been fired after last season, and this season he should be fired again. We lose the line of scrimage battle on nearly every play. I don't think it is talent, but rather scheme. If it is talent, then there is no excuse for why we aren't getting linemen. We run the ball, we have a great tradition, we have run a heisman campaign for a lineman and got him to New York. Linemen should want to play here, unless the coach isn't very good, the recruiting effort is weak, or we are going for the wrong guys.

    I hate to say it but look at Minnesota's line and how they block, then look at scUM's then look at ours.

    Bottom line Fire Jim Bollman, he isn't a good O-coodintator, but he is a worse offensive line coach.
  5. CleveBucks

    CleveBucks Serenity now

    Don't blame Bollman for the O-coord woes. He's that in title only.

    But I agree, he has shown zero when it comes to teaching and coaching the O-line. I can't recall the last game I really felt our O-line was the better of the two on the field. Team like NW and Marshall are driving our guys 5 yards off the LoS on rushing plays and giving their QB's all day long. Ours collpases on many pass plays and does nothing but maybe hold the D-line at a neutral position on rushing plays. No driving the defense back at all.
  6. LordJeffBuck

    LordJeffBuck Illuminatus Emeritus Staff Member BP Recruiting Team

    Care to retract that comment?
    Deety likes this.
  7. rocketman

    rocketman flying low

  8. JCOSU86

    JCOSU86 Go Bucks! Staff Member

    Oh, how he has been biding his time to say this

  9. ntd

    ntd Newbie

    Ya know, I still can't believe the Browns played prevent the entire drive
  10. MililaniBuckeye

    MililaniBuckeye The satanic soulless freight train that is Ohio St Staff Member Tech Admin

    I would like to think that the improvement in our OL over the last two seasons has as much to do with Peterson's involvement as anything else.
  11. scott91575

    scott91575 Resident hater

    Yeah, 4 possible NFL guys. Another quality post by Tibor.
  12. Oneshot

    Oneshot Goes For Three

    That's ignorant, scott.

    Look at the way they were playing when the comment was made.

    He had every right to believe so. He didn't say anything about potential, he said that they hadn't shown him anything yet. And he was right.

    Thank god he didn't stay right, though.
  13. MililaniBuckeye

    MililaniBuckeye The satanic soulless freight train that is Ohio St Staff Member Tech Admin

    Yep, and then ever since Peterson got involved...
  14. tsteele316

    tsteele316 Mr. Such and Such

    well, thankfully college scholarships are given for four years and not two.

Share This Page