• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

osugrad21

Capo Regime
Staff member
Link

[SIZE=+2]Mountaineers can forget about national title, radio host says[/SIZE]

Jacob Messer
Daily Mail sportswriter

[SIZE=-1]Tuesday September 05, 2006[/SIZE] MORGANTOWN -- West Virginia football fans might argue otherwise, but Colin Cowherd swears he has nothing against their beloved Mountaineers.
"Those people probably think I hate their program," said Cowherd, an ESPN Radio personality whose expertise is college football. "I don't. I hate their conference. I don't hate the Mountaineers; I hate the Big East."
Why? Because the Big East Conference is weaker than Popeye without his spinach since Boston College, Miami and Virginia Tech bolted for the Atlantic Coast Conference, Cowherd would say.
Forget the fact that the Big East started the season with a 7-1 record last week. Cowherd would argue that seven wins in eight games doesn't mean much when three of them come against Division I-AA members McNeese State, Rhode Island and Eastern Kentucky and three more come against I-A cupcakes Kentucky, Marshall and North Carolina.
WVU has finished atop the Big East standings three consecutive seasons and probably will make it four in a row this year.
Put the Mountaineers in the Big Ten or the Southeastern Conference, however, and they would fare no better than "third or fourth," Cowherd said, because they don't have the overall talent or depth of the top-tier teams in those leagues.
And, yes, he knows WVU beat Georgia in the Sugar Bowl.
"That was West Virginia's biggest game in a decade," said Cowherd, who argues that the Mountaineers can beat a national power in a single-game situation but not a bunch of national powers in a four- or five-game stretch. "That was Georgia's seventh-biggest game last season. Look at the schedule. They play Auburn, Tennessee, Florida, LSU.
"A bowl game is supposed to be a reward. Georgia didn't want to play a home game against West Virginia. I don't believe it was fluke. I believe West Virginia can play with the big boys. But West Virginia was focused for that game. Georgia wasn't."
Nevertheless, Cowherd calls WVU "a legitimate top 15 program."
In fact, Cowherd predicts the Mountaineers will finish the regular season with an undefeated record but won't play for the national championship.
Instead, Cowherd thinks two one-loss teams -- Auburn, Florida, Ohio State, Notre Dame and Southern Cal are among his possibilities -- will make it to the Bowl Championship Series final over WVU.
"How am I supposed to vote WVU above one of those teams," Cowherd asked, "when I know those other teams have better players and play better teams?"
Again, don't get the wrong idea. Cowherd thinks highly of WVU Coach Rich Rodriguez ("a premier coach") and the Mountaineers, especially sophomore sensations Patrick White and Steve Slaton ("two great, great players").
But?
"They play in the Big East," Cowherd said. "When you play in the Big East, you have to schedule some big-time, out-of-conference teams to make up for it. You need to schedule at least two very meaty games. You don't have to play Ohio State and Michigan, but you need to play at least one of them."
The Mountaineers don't do that this season. Their out-of-conference schedule features Marshall, Eastern Washington, Maryland, East Carolina and Mississippi State.
"They don't play anybody," Cowherd said.
Cowherd suggests WVU use USC as a model in the future.
"USC knows the Pac-10 is weak," said Cowherd, whom Sports Illustrated named its 2005 Radio Personality of the Year. "They go out of their way to play a brutal out-of-conference schedule."
WVU, he said, needs to do the same.
And, please, don't use the excuse that schedules are made years in advance.
"That's bull crap," Cowherd said.
"There are a million teams that would love to play West Virginia. They don't have to play Eastern Washington."
Cowherd, by the way, attended Eastern Washington, the Division I-AA team that will travel to Morgantown this weekend to take on WVU.
The Eagles and Mountaineers will face off Saturday at 1 p.m. in a soldout game that won't be televised.
"Even though Eastern Washington has produced some great players and fine broadcasters, West Virginia can name the score this weekend," Cowherd said. "Don't get me wrong. I love my Eagles. But that will be a bloodbath. They may surrender in the third quarter."
 
Link

Kyle's Korner: WVU not getting any respect


Tuesday, October 10, 2006 4:37 PM CDT

I'll give my high school and grade school teachers gray hairs with this Rodney Dangerfield quote, but it fits the West Virginia University football team.

?I don't get no respect,? the late Dangerfield would utter. Double negative aside, WVU isn't getting the respect they deserve in the polls.

They dropped in both polls this week despite defeating Mississi-ppi State (an SEC team) on the road 42-14 last Saturday.

Sure, the Bulldogs hung around a while. But after all was said and done, the Mountaineers took care of business. And after a bye week, most teams come out with a little rust.

Coach Rich Rodriguez knows his team must do something about the penalties they keep rolling up. Still, they are 5-0 and have one of the best, if not the best, backfields in the country.

Throw in a legitimate Heisman Trophy candidate in Steve Slaton and WVU merits the press and exposure they have been getting.

Still, this week they dropped one spot in the ratings to No. 5 in the AP poll and one spot in the coaches poll.

WVU starts Big East conference play this Saturday as they host Syracuse at 12 noon. It will be homecoming for the Mountaineers. (The game will be televised locally on WCHS)

They must win out and hope for some help in order to move into the top two positions. That's possible given the schedules of the other teams now rated ahead of them including Florida, USC and Michigan.

USC almost lost last weekend and is sure to go down some weekend. Florida still has to play Auburn this Saturday night and Michigan always has Ohio State looming in the background.

Coach Rod's team has to take care of business. They must beat Louisville (Thursday night, Nov. 2) and then win the backyard brawl at Pitt. They finish up with a surprising and dangerous Rutgers team.

Even if WVU goes undefeated, they still might not have a shot at the top BCS bowl and a chance to play for the mythical national championship.

Indeed, this would be a big double negative for WVU.
 
Upvote 0
They dropped in both polls this week despite defeating Mississi-ppi State (an SEC team) on the road 42-14 last Saturday.
I love how that is thrown in there to make it look like beating Mississippi State is an accomplishment.

Note to WVU backers....when you're to the point where you have to include that MSU is an SEC team to validate your weak ass schedule, it's time to accept it.
 
Upvote 0
I guess I come down in the middle...I think WVU is actually a really good team, with a couple of legit explosive players, and they did beat a real SEC team at the end of last year. However, if you play a season of shit, you should not play for the NC, even if you win all of your games. We could have Stanford, Baylor, Duke, and Cincinnati on the schedule this year, and claim "We played 4 teams from BCS conferences, how many have you played?" but no sane person would ever do that.
 
Upvote 0
DaytonBuck;630678; said:
I'm not sure Miss. State could win either division in the MAC
Rece Davis was just on Spielman's show on 1460, and mentioned that one thing you can say about the SEC is that even the doormats have something to hang their hat on at the end of the day. Mississippi State's offense doesn't scare anybody, but their defense is pretty darn good, and would be a lot better statistically if they didn't spend 35 - 40 minutes on the field week after week. I'm inclined to agree with Rece on that, having watched two different MSU games this season. Croom really did inherit a mess, and he's heading in the right direction even if the W/L column doesn't reflect that right now.

That said, Rece added that the SEC's top teams are generally overrated, and that in his opinion either Ohio State or Michigan would wax all comers and win the SEC outright.

I think Rece is a pretty smart guy. :biggrin:
 
Upvote 0
Brutus1;1006119; said:
Because that's the way it works. You want a guaranteed spot in the Sugar bowl, then don't lose to Illinois.

Although the Sugar Bowl is not the national championship game, it's amazing how few people realize that once you lose a game, your argument for your team making the national championship game is as bad as the other guy's.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top