• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

2006 Ohio State Outlook: Defense

Defensive cateories in which we are in the top ten:

Scoring: #3
Interceptions: #2
TFL: #6
Sacks: #8
3rd down: #10

Categories related to both defense and offense:

TO lost: #1
TO margin: #2
 
Upvote 0
as a whole? yes i think this d has the potential to be a "more effective" d than last years.

but it all breaks down to how you intend to compare this d with last years to determine which is/was "better". if you want to do position by position, without question last years team was superior. outside of the d line and mj (and an arguement could be made against mj as he played a significant portion of last season), man for man last years squad would start over this seasons. shlegs the senior would start over jl the sophmore, aj hawk the senior would start over freeman/terry etc..

now, if you want to talk straight up effectiveness as a complete unit? i would have to give a slight nod to this years unit. not because they have more talent, experience, and ability man for man at this point. i honestly don't think that, as of today, they do. but they have more talent, experience, and ability at the right places this season. people like to talk about how increadible hawk, carp, whitner and the rest were. and don't get me wrong, hawk/carp/schelgs imo is the best lb crew i have ever seen. whitner and salley could hold their own against anyone. ay, everett, and mj were solid on the corners. but when i watch our d line play i have 0 doubt as to why it is our turnover margin at midseason is already superior to that of all of last season.

when a d line can sustain consistent pressure on an opposing teams qb and be that disruptive in the backfield with 4, and sometimes 3, rushers... the freedom that gives a d is well... rather unfair really :p. people seem to have trouble understanding why we didn't have many turnovers last year with a team that blitzed a lb nearly ever other snap and often had a lb playing de as well as bringing cb's and safeties on a consistant basis to keep pressure on a qb. when you can place consistent pressure on a qb with 7 or up to 8 guys in pass coverage... you can't ask for a better formula for turnovers.

many of our picks have been passes thrown directly to lb's doing nothing more than sitting in their zones watching the qb's eyes. which tells me they are a direct result of the pressure applied by the d line without the need for assistance from the lb's and secondary. the lb that makes the int this season, was the lb who was blitzing to produce the pressure in the first place last season leaving noone there to catch the errant pass. that is the difference in the teams imo.

both d's were/have been thus far wildly effective. 1 d was successful without a dominating d line. the other is effective largely because of their dominating d line. which is/was better? true...?
 
Upvote 0
martinss01;637295; said:
as a whole? yes i think this d has the potential to be a "more effective" d than last years.

but it all breaks down to how you intend to compare this d with last years to determine which is/was "better". if you want to do position by position, without question last years team was superior. outside of the d line and mj (and an arguement could be made against mj as he played a significant portion of last season), man for man last years squad would start over this seasons. shlegs the senior would start over jl the sophmore, A.J. Hawk the senior would start over freeman/terry etc..

now, if you want to talk straight up effectiveness as a complete unit? i would have to give a slight nod to this years unit. not because they have more talent, experience, and ability man for man at this point. i honestly don't think that, as of today, they do. but they have more talent, experience, and ability at the right places this season. people like to talk about how increadible hawk, carp, whitner and the rest were. and don't get me wrong, hawk/carp/schelgs imo is the best lb crew i have ever seen. whitner and salley could hold their own against anyone. ay, everett, and mj were solid on the corners. but when i watch our d line play i have 0 doubt as to why it is our turnover margin at midseason is already superior to that of all of last season.

when a d line can sustain consistent pressure on an opposing teams qb and be that disruptive in the backfield with 4, and sometimes 3, rushers... the freedom that gives a d is well... rather unfair really :p. people seem to have trouble understanding why we didn't have many turnovers last year with a team that blitzed a lb nearly ever other snap and often had a lb playing de as well as bringing cb's and safeties on a consistant basis to keep pressure on a qb. when you can place consistent pressure on a qb with 7 or up to 8 guys in pass coverage... you can't ask for a better formula for turnovers.

many of our picks have been passes thrown directly to lb's doing nothing more than sitting in their zones watching the qb's eyes. which tells me they are a direct result of the pressure applied by the d line without the need for assistance from the lb's and secondary. the lb that makes the int this season, was the lb who was blitzing to produce the pressure in the first place last season leaving noone there to catch the errant pass. that is the difference in the teams imo.

both d's were/have been thus far wildly effective. 1 d was successful without a dominating d line. the other is effective largely because of their dominating d line. which is/was better? true...?



That all totally makes sense, but the only reason why I just broght that up was because we lost/put in the draft 9 seniors last year and so for are defense has done and EXCELLENT job this year. I was just trying to compare the two and see the difference and see if this years defense had to cover up for any of the missing players?
 
Upvote 0
MSNBC.COM

Ohio State?s defense as good as its offense

No. 1 Buckeyes lost defensive stars from last year, but haven?t faltere


OPINION
By Tom Dienhart
[URL="http://register.sportingnews.com/subscriptions/index.html?sourceid=subscribe"][/URL]
Updated: 10:35 p.m. ET Oct 18, 2006
function UpdateTimeStamp(pdt) { var n = document.getElementById("udtD"); if(pdt != '' && n && window.DateTime) { var dt = new DateTime(); pdt = dt.T2D(pdt); if(dt.GetTZ(pdt)) {n.innerHTML = dt.D2S(pdt,((''.toLowerCase()=='false')?false:true));} } } UpdateTimeStamp('632968221297670000');

Meet Jim Laurinaitis.
Go ahead, shake his hand. You need to know the name and his game. Here's why: Laurinaitis, a sophomore middle linebacker, is the heart of an Ohio State defense that is better -- much better -- than anyone dreamed it would be.
"He's a special player," Texas offensive coordinator Greg Davis says. "Lauri ... . How do you say his name again?"
It's Lore-in-EYE-tis. It rhymes with -- well, it doesn't really rhyme with anything. But it rolls off your tongue once you've mastered the pronunciation. Here, try it again: Lore-in-EYE-tis.
Ah, forget it. Just look for No. 33 the next time Ohio State plays. He's a 6-3, 244-pound focus of fury, the kind of player grizzled coaches say "plays like his hair is on fire."
Perfect.
Funny, isn't it? Most were forecasting imperfection for the defense in the preseason. Back in August, the skinny on the Buckeyes went something like this: "The offense is going to have to be as great as everyone thinks to cover for an iffy defense." A Lamborghini with a four-cylinder engine. More to the point: Tackle Quinn Pitcock and cornerback Malcolm Jenkins had star power, but Ohio State was replacing nine starters, including a group of linebackers that featured first-round draft picks A.J. Hawk and Bobby Carpenter.
But look at Ohio State now, towing a 6-0 record, a No. 1 ranking and a head of steam that has the Buckeyes on track for their second national championship in five years.
"When we looked at the Ohio State film, I was hoping we might see some weaknesses with all the great players who left," Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz says. "I don't mind telling you that I was a little skeptical over the summer when I kept hearing that everyone was picking Ohio State to be at the top of the heap in the country.
"It's amazing. For the quote, unquote inexperience on the defensive side, those guys are playing super football."
Through six games, Ohio State's defense has morphed from suspect to super. The numbers don't lie. The Buckeyes lead the Big Ten and rank first in the nation in scoring defense (9.3 ppg), the only defensive stat that matters. Ohio State's numbers figure to improve over the next five games, which we'll unkindly dub speed bumps, until a season-ending visit from Michigan.
"This is a different team than last year," Ohio State defensive coordinator Jim Heacock says. "We are getting the feel of what works and what doesn't work with this group. We have a comfortable front four and continue to make progress and play better each week."
Still skeptical? Well, remember this: Few -- if any -- teams have played two tougher road games than the Buckeyes, who have ventured to Texas and Iowa and won. But the Texas game served as the punch-in-the-face attention grabber for the Ohio State defense and Laurinaitis, who recorded 13 tackles, two forced fumbles and an interception.
A rehab project? Ridiculous.
"They are a carbon copy of last year," says Northern Illinois offensive coordinator John Bond, who got the first crack at Ohio State's defense this season.
"We had some success with screens into some of their zone pressures, but that was about all we did that worked consistently well. They swarm to the ball. They gang tackle."
And they're deep despite losing all of those starters, including six NFL draft picks -- safeties Donte Whitner and Nate Salley, linebacker Anthony Schlegel and cornerback Ashton Youboty, in addition to Hawk and Carpenter.
"It's interesting to have as many guys rotating on defense as we do," Laurinaitis says. "It also is comforting. Any time a team has a lot of depth, it fires up competition and makes everyone step it up in practice. But we have a lot of work to do to eliminate big plays and increase our confidence."
Another key to Ohio State's defensive prowess: The Buckeyes haven't plugged freshmen into many starting roles. Check out the line, which starts three seniors and a sophomore. That veteran savvy, led by Pitcock, has created a disruptive push that has buffered the most youthful aspect of the defense: the secondary.
No doubt: If you're looking for a weakness, stop here. Ohio State starts a redshirt freshman. And another starter (Anderson Russell) has been lost for the season because of a knee injury, which further muddles the picture. The Buckeyes have minimized their use of risky coverages because of the youth and are playing lots of zone. Ohio State has yielded a few big plays -- too many for Heacock's liking -- but this still is an aggressive, attacking defense. It just has to be more judicious than it was last season when it comes to punching the pedal.
And then there are the linebackers. The famed Hawk-Carpenter-Schlegel trio has been replaced by sophomore Marcus Freeman, fifth-year senior John Kerr and Laurinaitis, the team's leader in tackles and interceptions.
Laurinaitis is an animal. Well, not really, but he is the son of The Animal, who was half of the famed tag team pro wrestler duo known as the Road Warriors and later as the Legion of Doom. Come crying to Daddy with a skinned knee in this family and you'll likely get a folding chair across the back. So, given those bloodlines, it's no wonder Laurinaitis is doing what he's doing.
"He's smart," Ohio State coach Jim Tressel says. "He studies it. And he's committed physically. He's very instinctive, and I think he'll do nothing but keep getting better."
Just like the Ohio State defense.
? 2006 The Sporting News
 
Upvote 0
OZone

Football
Heacock Has OSU Defense Believing and Improving
By John Porentas​
Seven games into the season and the Buckeye defense is starting to make believers out of the skeptics.​
What was thought to be the Achilles heel of the 2006 OSU football team looked like a strength last Saturday in East Lansing. OSU's defense did a job on the Spartan offense, just missing a shutout when MSU scored a last-minute touchdown to avert the whitewashing. While very few believed that the OSU defense could be strong when the season began, the architect of that defense, OSU defensive coordinator Jim Heacock, set his team's goals high despite the cynicism.​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Brandon Mitchell [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Photo by Jim Davidson [/FONT]
BMitchell.jpg
"The first day we came here these were his exact words: 'Nobody else in the country outside of this room thinks we can be the number one defense in the country but us, so lets go out there and prove it.' Those were the very first words that he said right before spring practice started. I think he's done a very good job of making sure everyone is on track and and doing everything right," said OSU senior safety Brandon Mitchell.​
Heacock set the bar high. The Buckeye clearly did not measure up early in the season, but have definitely made strides as they have progressed through the schedule.Last Saturday they were pretty darned good in East Lansing, but when you play for Jim Heacock, that's not good enough.​
"We're approaching some of our goals and we're probably playing better than some people expected us to, but for us that's not good enough," said defensive end Jay Richardson.​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Jim Heacock
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Photo by Jim Davidson[/FONT]
JHeacock.jpg
"Our goal was to try and be the best, so we've got a lot of improvement to make as far as not giving teams yards," Richardson said.​
Mitchell concurred.​
"Coach (Heacock) always says that to be the number one defense you have to stop the run, and we've only done that one game this season," said Mitchell.​
"I wouldn't say that we've dominated. We've done a good job on third down and in the red zone. Last week we stopped the run, but overall we haven't stopped the run very well. We're just working to get a little bit better every day and keep holding teams down," Mitchell said.​
The remarkable subtlety in all of it is that Heacock has simultaneous instilled the ideas in his players that the OSU defense can be the best, but that they aren't yet there. The psychological tightrope he has his team crossing is that they can be good enough to be the best, and despite the fact that they aren't there yet and have flaws they need to work on correcting, they are still good enough to achieve their goal if they keep working at it. Heacock is a master at maintaining that balancing act.​
"If you ask me Coach Heacock is a player's coach," said Mitchell.​
"He's one of those guys who knows how to motivate.​
"He's a real good motivator and when he's standing in front of us he's really calm. It's funny, if you do something wrong on those sidelines or even in practice he'll get after you really, really hard, but off the field he's a gentle guy.​
"I think guys really like that. He's very approachable and you just like being around him. He's very infectious," Mitchell said.​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Jay Richardson
Photo by Jim Davidson
[/FONT]
JRichardson.jpg
"Coach Heacock is kind of like a General," added Richardson.​
"He keeps everybody in line, focused on the goal. He's an extremely intense person with a lot of energy and extremely focused. I think we all kind of feed off of him. He kind of puts a fire in you. He's really extremely passionate. I think that's what our young guys and us veterans too feed off of. We kind of take his focus with us in the games."​
It's kind of tough to explain really, unless you've had the pleasure of talking to the man. One-on-one, there is a definite calm, and you always feel like he has time for you and that he is listening to everything you say and cares about what you are saying. At the same time, there is also no question whatever that he does not tolerate mediocrity or underachieving. He combines those two qualities in a way that never leaves you feeling belittled, but there is always the unmistakable impression that you had always be at your best. It's the stuff that great coaches are made of, ones that make their players understand that there is no such thing as being satisfied until you are what he expects, the very best.​
"To be satisfied we have to be the number one defense in the country by the end of the season. Until we are we can't say we've reached our goals," said Mitchell remembering Heacock's first-day challenge to the defense to prove the skeptics wrong.​
Last Saturday in East Lansing, the Buckeyes appeared to be going in the right direction to get to that goal. Heacock will keep them headed that way.​
 
Upvote 0
Dispatch

OHIO STATE FOOTBALL
Heacock still pushing right buttons for stout defense
Thursday, October 19, 2006
Tim May
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH
20061019-Pc-B6-0600.jpg
NEAL C . LAURON DISPATCH Jay Richardson (99) and James Laurinaitis, stalwarts on Jim Heacock?s OSU defense, gave Michigan State?s Drew Stanton fits.
20061019-Pc-B1-1100.jpg
20061019-Pc-B1-1300.jpg

The Ohio State defense has a secret. It?s not that it replaced nine starters from last season, yet still is one of the top units in the country. The secret is its coordinator.
He?s Jim Heacock. His problem, if you can call it that, is he has this thing about the spotlight. He?d rather stay in the shadows.
"He doesn?t really care about how many times he?s in the paper or when he?s quoted or stuff like that," defensive end Jay Richardson said. "He wants to win games, and he wants to be the best defense in the country. That?s his only goal."
Cornerbacks coach Tim Beckman, along with safeties coach Paul Haynes and linebackers coach Luke Fickell, has found the planning room with Heacock to be an open forum, not three chairs facing a bully pulpit.
"We?re a team, we?re a union, and I think that?s what Jim does so well, he makes everybody accountable," said Beckman, who had been defensive coordinator at Bowling Green before coming to Ohio State in 2005. "We?re not doing the scheme because he thinks it?s right. We?re doing it because we believe it?s right."
As Heacock said, "I?m just one of the guys trying to help us win football games."
He was saying the same thing a year ago. Then, the defense was led by linebackers A.J. Hawk and Bobby Carpenter and safety Donte Whitner, all eventual first-round picks in the NFL draft. It was Heacock?s first season as coordinator after 10 as the defensive line coach, and he said he happened to get promoted at an opportune time.
Having to come up with nine new starters this season, he also needed a different spiel. The day before spring practice, "These were his exact words: ?Nobody else in the country outside of this room thinks we can be the No. 1 defense in the country but us,? " safety Brandon Mitchell said. " ?So let?s go out there and prove it.? "
The spring before, Heacock had said almost the opposite to a star-studded group coming off a lackluster 2004.
"That?s the thing about coach Heacock, he knows how to get the best out of all of his players," Mitchell said. "He knows when we?re down and he might need to pick us up a little bit. And he knows when we?re high, maybe a little full of ourselves, he knows exactly how to knock us down."
It is effective. Heading toward a home game Saturday against Indiana, the Ohio State defense ? led by the ferocious front four of Quinn Pitcock, Richardson, David Patterson and Vernon Gholston ? is near the top nationally in almost every major statistic, not the least of which is fewest points allowed (third, with a 9.0 average).
There?s more to the Heacockled defense than humility, tackle Kirk Barton said.
"His big thing is toughness," Barton said. And then, from an X-and-O standpoint, "They really come up with some exotic blitzes, because they get to unveil them on us every Tuesday when we practice. ? They?re also great at finding the right time to call them."
Last week early at Michigan State, it happened when the Spartans got the ball deep in Buckeyes territory after a fumble. In shot linebacker James Laurinaitis on third down to sack quarterback Drew Stanton for a 16-yard loss to knock the Spartans out of field goal range. They didn?t get near the goal again until the last two minutes of the Buckeyes? 38-7 win.
It was the best overall day for a defense that seems to be getting better by the game. One major reason, Mitchell said, is the leadership of Heacock, even if he doesn?t want the credit.
"Coach Heacock is kind of like a general," Richardson said. "He keeps everybody in line. He keeps everybody focused on the goal. He is an extremely intense person, with a lot of energy and extremely focused. I think we all feed off of him."
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top