• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Facebook

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
DubCoffman62 said:
That why I only talk politics on messenger now :excited: But understand this. They have AI bots that pick up on key words and phrases that can ban you. You can appeal and have a human look at it but 99% of the times the mod that checks it out is going to be a green haired social justice warrior and if what you say triggers it, you're going to get a ban. I once infiltrated a black supremacy group and the shit they were saying made me laugh but some of them did get banned. The funny part was whenever someone got banned they just assumed someone reported them and never thought that maybe the words they used were getting picked up by AI.
Click to expand...
DubCoffman62 said:
I always trolled under my real name
Click to expand...
Maybe it's not evil nefarious out to get you two hidden key words. Maybe.
 
Upvote 0
by Geoffrey R. Stone
Edward H. Levi Distinguished Service Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School

by Eugene Volokh
Gary T. Schwartz Distinguished Professor of Law; Founder and Co-Author of "The Volokh Conspiracy" at Reason Magazine

“Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” What does this mean today? Generally speaking, it means that the government may not jail, fine, or impose civil liability on people or organizations based on what they say or write, except in exceptional circumstances.

Although the First Amendment says “Congress,” the Supreme Court has held that speakers are protected against all government agencies and officials: federal, state, and local, and legislative, executive, or judicial. The First Amendment does not protect speakers, however, against private individuals or organizations, such as private employers, private colleges, or private landowners. The First Amendment restrains only the government.
Click to expand...
(LINK)
 
Upvote 0
Steve19 said:
by Geoffrey R. Stone
Edward H. Levi Distinguished Service Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School

by Eugene Volokh
Gary T. Schwartz Distinguished Professor of Law; Founder and Co-Author of "The Volokh Conspiracy" at Reason Magazine

(LINK)
Click to expand...
Anyone with two brain cells understands that (hopefully). For example, I can be fired from my job for saying something on social media that reflects bad on my company. Social media companies absolutely do have the right to set their own community standards and force them as they see fit. However, they do seem kind of arbitrary. I can see banning someone for slurs, obscenities, threats, harassment... but unpopular opinions, and I'm not saying they don't have the right to do you, is extremely petty
 
Upvote 0
3074326 said:
What were the shared opinions that got people banned?
Click to expand...
One was asking out loud how obese women of color became the new standard of beauty in this civilization. I also may have questioned perverse sex acts in front of children at pride parade. Then there was something about violent crime stats and how one particular group committed them and an alarming disproportional rate.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
LovelandBuckeye said:
Obviously Facebook is trying to enhance your fetish since it is based off search history. NTTIAWWT

:lol:
Click to expand...

Is that's what's going on?

Because these are the ads that come up for me:

Screen-Shot-2021-02-01-at-2.01.18-PM-768x445-1.png
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top